212

‘It is shameful’: why the return of Victorian-era diseases to the UK alarms health experts (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There has been a surge in cases of scabies and measles – both highly contagious – as well as rickets and scurvy, conditions we thought had been eradicated. Are public health cuts to blame?

Before Covid-19, Dr Farzana Hussain says, it was rare for her to see a case of scabies at her GP surgery in Newham, east London, but since the pandemic, the number of patients with the parasitic skin infection has increased dramatically.

“By the time a patient comes to me for advice, everyone in the family has it, including all the children,” she says. “The itch is maddening. People demand immediate treatment.”

Transmitted by tiny mites that burrow and lay eggs under the skin, scabies is a disease associated with squalor and overcrowding. Spread by close personal contact, it is so infectious that during the Victorian period, workhouses maintained separate “itch” wards so those infested with the mites could be segregated and treated before being allowed into the workhouse proper.

According to the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), scabies cases are now running at three per 100,000 of the population in England, double the five-year seasonal average. That translates into approximately 2,000 cases of scabies a year. However, in the north, the worst affected region of England, GPs are seeing rates as high as six per 100,000.

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Treczoks@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago

Well, a lot of the Leavers wanted to bathe in a perceived Victorian Empires' Greatness. At least in that aspect they have reaches Victorian levels...

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Won't it be so romantic to see bare footed children scavenge for a living in the mud of the Thames again? Just like the good old days?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

For Marmot, the surge in infectious diseases reflects the cost of living crisis and decade-long cuts to social services and public health, which have left Britain with one of the poorest and most vulnerable populations in Europe.

But because of cuts to frontline services and a shortage of sexual health counsellors, getting an appointment at a clinic can take weeks, and patients who succeed in getting one can face waits of up to four hours before being seen.

Helen Bedford, professor of children’s health at University College London, believes the shortfall is one of the factors driving the low uptake of the MMR jab and other vaccines.

Hussain says another factor is fatigue: “During the pandemic, people took on board the message to get the Covid vaccine, but now don’t feel it’s necessary – or that they have the time – to get the measles jabs for their children.

Similarly, the incidence of rickets is far below the rate seen in the 1800s, when London was blanketed by smog, blocking UV radiation, and it is estimated that the condition affected 60% of children living in the capital.

The original article contains 1,675 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago

From the article:

But is there a danger that in comparing today’s situation with the Victorian period we may be getting things out of proportion? For instance, one of the key reasons scabies cases are increasing, according to the British Association of Dermatologists, is a shortage of treatments such as permethrin and malathion. And not every case of scurvy is due to parents being unable to afford fresh fruit and vegetables – sometimes, a vitamin C deficiency may be due to children being picky eaters.

People opting out of vaccines is very different from a shortage of medicines/treatment. It isn't entirely dissimilar from people choosing riskier sex (which is mentioned in the article).

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

That is not to say we should be complacent, however. Dr Benjamin Jacobs, an expert on rickets at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital in Stanmore, Middlesex, says that whereas in the 1980s it was unusual to see a case of rickets, today, sadly, the condition is no longer a rarity. “I see at least three children with rickets each year; each case is a heartbreak,” he says.

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago

I read "return of Victorian era dresses" and wondered why that's a huge health worry.

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 6 points 8 months ago

JRRM opened his cabinet of curiosities?

[-] kilinrax@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

JRRM

I'm not sure if this is a typo on Jacob William Rees-Mogg, or George R.R. Martin

[-] Meron35@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Jeorge R R Martin

[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Scurvy? Are Brits refusing to eat plants now?

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024

212 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38968 readers

2163 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.