this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
76 points (95.2% liked)

3DPrinting

15644 readers
358 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have trouble fixing the terrible seams I'm getting. I've followed Elli's print tuning guide and calibrated extruder, tuned PA (it's now 0.035) and extrusion multiplier.

I've tried adjusting both retraction length and speed, but it doesn't seem to have much impact. I'm not using "wipe on retract" or "retract on layer change", I only retract if travel distance is longer than 3mm. Retract is 0.3mm @35mm/s.

I've tried reducing PA smooth time too, but this also doesn't seem to have a noticable impact.

I've tried reducing seam gap from the default 10% in Orca all the way down to 0%, but the bad seams persist.

I've tried with "wipe on loops" both disabled and enabled with no difference.

I've tried with both arachne and classic wall generator, no difference.

I've tried different wall orders, inner/outer, inner/outer/inner and outer/inner, all with the same bad seams.

Filament in the picture is matte PLA, it is without doubt dry and generally prints well aside from the seams. It's stored vacuum sealed with silica, and I use a filament dryer to dry if I suspect wet filament.

I'm running out of ideas for where to tweak to get a decent result.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Randomize Z seam and make sure your flow/retraction settings are as good as you can get them.

Messing around with your nozzle temperature might help too: Keep in mind that the thermistor in the heat block might be off by a few degrees so if you can measure the temperature directly as a comparison, it can help you figure out how much it's usually off by and adjust accordingly.

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Randomised seams just spreads the issue out on the entire model surface, it looks even worse like that.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It will probably help more once your settings are dialed in, otherwise, yeah it's just going to distribute the mess. Alternately, keep everything as is and fix it up post-print via filler and sanding.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Randomize Z seam

There is never a situation where this is a good setting to have on.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Can't say I agree but you print how you want.

[–] callcc@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Most probably PA. You should try adjusting it while printing using some g-code console. This way you get immediate feedback. What they often don't tell you is that pressure advance is not something you can calibrate once and forget, it's dependent on material, temperature, nozzle diameter and also a lot on feed rate and extrusion rate.

The need for PA and precise tuning is more pronounced the higher changes in extrusion rate you have eg, you print very fast or with wide or high layers.

Just play around with it a bit and I'm sure that you'll find a better value after some layers.

There are even macros that try to remove the feed rate dependency by effectively replacing every g-code that adjusts feed-rate by a combination of the original g-code pre-ceded by an adjustment of PA. I haven't tried them out yet though.

What's weird is the differences of the effect between the layers. Is the every layer the same or is the path different for different layers? Maybe post some images of the inside of the model.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

This is a good idea. I will further add that Klipper lets you dick with the linear/pressure advance parameters mid-print via GUI with its Fluidd interface. Other systems probably have similar capabilities.

A good test model for this might be a thin walled hollow cylinder with the Z seam facing the user (i.e. out the door or front of the machine) only 2 layers thick or so. That sounds like it ought to make the issue visible quickly, and with minimum of wasted time and filament on infill (not to mention ruined parts).

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

_ I’m not using .... “retract on layer change”_

There's your problem.

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

No, I've tried with that enabled as well, same issue. This isn't before a layer change, it's when it goes from extruding the walls to extruding the infill.

But even without infill this happens. It's the end of the outer wall that doesn't connect to the beginning of the outer wall and it's not really fixed by reducing seam gap, so I'm not sure what's actually causing it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Disclaimer: I'm not into 3d printing. I'm just a wannabe with not enough time on my hands, so take this post with a bucket of salt. I have, on the other hand, worked a lot with automated machinery.

But if I were to make a guess, I would suspect some slack in either the X or Y direction, resulting in inaccuracy when the nozzle changes direction. This should in theory be less visible when the nozzle is not making sharp turns.

Are your belts tight? Any gears with poorly meshed teeth?

Also, are you able to turn the print (and the seam) 45 and 90 degrees? Do they show up just as ugly? If not, the issue is mechanically limited to one axis.

[–] Betch@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Actually yeah, you might be on to something there. OP could try adjusting belt tension.

If you do end up adjusting belt tension though, make sure to recalibrate your e-steps after.

[–] callcc@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It's worth a look but I really suspect PA to be the culprit here. The differences between the layers are probably explained by the feed rate after or before the turn due to different path planning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

In what can only be described as "perfect timing", the 3d printing channel teaching tech uploaded a video about just this problem literally a day ago: https://youtu.be/vl0FT339jfc

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah I can see that the seams of his "before" models is actually look like what I've been able to achieve on mine now. I guess I was trying to fix the last bit with standard seam options which might not have been possible.

I'll download the noisyfox orca slicer and test the scarf seams out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 4 points 8 months ago

Have you tried checking the belts and all the bearings/rails for tightness and smoothness? It almost seems like layer shift at the seam, and if you compare both seams side by side, layer by layer, it almost seems like the print head shifts equally on both prints for any given layer (e.g. left print looks over-extruded while right print is under-extruded, next layer up, it flips and right print looks over-extruded while left print looks under-extruded).

If not the belts or other hardware, perhaps it's a flow issue. Do you know if the gross looking seams are the start or the end of the layer?

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (7 children)

There is a setting in super slicer called Seam gap, do you see a setting like that you can play with?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

That retract distance seems a bit low to me. My (direct drive) printer is happier around 1mm to 1.5mm. I'm not convinced that has anything to do with your particular problem, though.

Anyhow, to my untrained eye that looks like underextrusion at layer change and/or the perimeter lines not actually hitting each other. Are you sure your pressure advance/linear advance values are correct for that filament?

Also, does Orca Slicer allow you to specify a negative value for the seam gap? If so, that might be worth fooling with to see if it has any impact. That's probably a band-aid, though. I think your issue lies in pressure advance tuning still.

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is the filament I've tuned PA with, and to my best ability this is what Elli's guide suggests is the optimal value 🤷‍♂️

But I agree, it does actually look like PA is tuned incorrectly and stopping extrusion too soon/starting it too late.

[–] rambos@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Try without PA, also try another filament

[–] rambos@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Also try normal brass nozzle and check if your new hotend is not loose

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Tried without PA but there was no difference, going to try different filament next.

As I mentioned somewhere else in this post, it seems to relate to the infill. I'm using gyroid, and the seam lines up with the anchor point for the infill.

[–] rambos@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

You can also try without infill 😉

Im throwing many things to try, but not in any particular order

[–] bigredgiraffe@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So I stared at this for a while, particularly the pattern of the seam, I have a few questions. What type of infill are you using? how many outer wall loops? How much infill overlap (or whatever it is called)?

Also what happens if you rotate the part on the bed 90 degrees so the seam is on a different axis? Or maybe 45 degrees? This will make sure it’s not some sort of mechanical issue in one direct that shows up in this specific situation.

I know that all seems random but those are what I would check hah.

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

Issue seems to be following the seam when I rotate parts. in this particular example I am using 5% gyroid, if I switch to grid the defect is uniform along the part. This is just 2 walls, can't remmber infill overlap, I'll check tonight.

[–] mildbeard@linux.community 3 points 8 months ago
[–] Betch@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (20 children)

That's a really weird looking z-seam, something is going on there that I'm not quite sure the cause of.

However, in this case I think you could try randomizing z-seam position. It's not gonna fix the issue completely but it might help you with this particular part.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›