this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
298 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3253 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 136 points 8 months ago (3 children)

If they use this as an excuse to get a mistrial, I’ll lose my shit.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 76 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ugh, they're not sure what the motivation is, but I can't help but wonder if these hackers are Russian state actors or affiliated and want to do exactly that.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In a message posted online Saturday, in both English and Russian, the hacking group called LockBit said the stolen documents "contain a lot of interesting things and Donald Trump's court cases that could affect the upcoming US election."

Seems like it. I wouldn't put it past them to fabricate documents that make it look like the prosecution is more malicious than it is.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Didn’t LockBit just get rolled by the feds?

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Read The Fucking Albatross? 🤔

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 8 months ago

Close, it's Return The Fucking Armadillo.

That's what the ransom is about. "I have a very particular set of skills: if you don't return my fucking armadillo you'll find out what they are."

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Yes, but they are apparently already back up and running or were never really all that "down".

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They'd ask for a mistrial if someone in the gallery looked at them funny

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yea, and if they get it, OP will lose his shit.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'll find it and take it home with me.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

There is no reason to think this would be legitimate grounds for a mistrial, although Trump's team will probably pretend like it is.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 61 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

New Trump defense strategy.

  • Step 1: Leak documents acquired through discovery to Russian allies.
  • Step 2: Have allies demand ransom to not release documents and then (maybe) release them when they don't get paid.
  • Step 3: Wail like a toddler about how unfairly you've been treated and get a mistrial or get the trial delayed .

Either a mistrial or a delay would very much work to Trump's advantage. Plus, he can fund raise off this to get yet more money from the rubes.

Also, it's my understanding that Russian hackers know better than to step on daddy Putin's toes, unless you like poison tea or short flights out high windows. Why would Russian actors suddenly turn on Trump when they've been using him successfully for decades? My money says this is just for show.---

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget Step 4: insert a few fake documents amidst the real ones. A few fake invoices for services between the prosecutors could back up the fiction that the Georgia DA was corrupt.

[–] n0m4n@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

This tactic was reportedly what happened in the "Russia, If you are listening" packets that Putin dropped. Russia is at war with the US. I am going by evidence of their previous tactics.

Why would anyone believe the FSB?

[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Okay hear me out:

Collect the Ransom. Then release anyway.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Trump gets mistrial. Then he gets reelected.

I don't think you follow this plan out far enough.

[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago (4 children)

In my defense:

I am not very smart

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There are plenty of us on here. I got my degree in stupid. Actually it was only an honorary degree I filled out on the back of a Wendy's job application.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I won the local Bad Decisions Championship 9 of the last 10 years.

The reason I didn't win last year was because I stayed up all night watching YouTube reaction videos and slept through the competition, so I consider it a moral victory.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Well I am a card-carrying donkey brain level idiot. Yes, the card is made out of fruit roll ups.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 8 months ago

Pshh look at this smarty pants with their degree! I dropped out of stupid school because I kept giving everyone headaches!

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

That's the same defense Trump uses!

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Title of your autobiography

[–] groupofcrows@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

You are better than those who cannot recognise or admit to having any limitations.

[–] s0ckpuppet@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

You realize that leaking these documents could result in a mistrial?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Are they blackmailing Trump? Or Georgia?

Either way it’s probably going to come out in trial anyhow.

[–] s0ckpuppet@kbin.social 22 points 8 months ago

This is most likely an attempt to get him off the hook via mistrial.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] s0ckpuppet@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why would that be a good thing?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because the Georgia case is at real risk of being halted due to events having nothing to do with the merits of the case.

[–] s0ckpuppet@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Making the information public knowledge may help push the election when the criminal case cannot.

[–] s0ckpuppet@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Or it could cause a mistrial and he gets off the hook yet again

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The hacking group responsible for taking down Fulton County's websites in Georgia is threatening to publish documents from the state's court system — including ones related to the criminal case against Donald Trump — unless it gets paid a ransom.

In a message posted online Saturday, in both English and Russian, the hacking group called LockBit said the stolen documents "contain a lot of interesting things and Donald Trump's court cases that could affect the upcoming US election."

Its targets in recent years include Boeing, the UK's National Health Service and Royal Mail, and the state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has charged the former president and more than a dozen of his allies with racketeering in connection to the attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 federal election in Georgia.

George Chidi, an Atlanta-based independent journalist, reported earlier this month that a sampling of files published by LockBit includes sealed court records in other unrelated cases.

A judge is hearing testimony from several of her associates — and Willis herself — over the question of whether the district attorney had an improper relationship with a prosecutor she hired to work on the Trump case.


The original article contains 1,266 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

Evidence that is going to come out in court anyhow isn't grounds for a mistrial.

And non-evidence would be irrelevant.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Oh look, it's Friday. Guess these guys were just full of shit.