this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

28301 readers
777 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Xylinna@lemmy.world
MrCenny@lemmy.world
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
woelkchen@lemmy.world
7
What happens if the AT Protocol will get large adoption? Will it be a good or a bad thing? Will it lead to more fragmentation? Will it be compatible with ActivityPub? (atproto.com)
submitted 1 year ago by vepro@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I stumbled upon this, but I don't know how it would affect the fediverse. The integrated account migration / moving sounds interesting, but on the other hand, it seems to belong to a company rather than a standardization comitee (W3C ActivityPub). I think it should be prevented that there will be a ActivityPub and AT fediverse that are completely isolated from each other (fragmentation)

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The integrated account migration / moving sounds interesting

That also exists in Mastodon (execution is slightly clunky but it's there), so it's not a ActivityPub limitation. Bluesky can also submit that protocol to become ActivityPub 2.0 or something.

[โ€“] skymtf@pricefield.org 1 points 1 year ago

The issue with activitypub is indemnity is tied to the username, so like when you move all threads will point to your old account. On AT other instance can update this internally and update their cached profile (I guess) I don't fully understand AT