It doesn't really matter which distro you use, all hail the Arch wiki!
PS: if you use ddg, !aw is your friend here
Well that's marvelous.
And yes, the above is not a joke. The Arch wiki is so dependable that I will often go there first, or prioritize their links in search results, for projects that don't actually involve Arch.
It's nice that Arch is providing an easier installation method, it's counter-productive for many users to have to contend with such detail just to have a functioning system.
how did I not know about !aw? Thanks for the tip, will be very useful
Or just never learn linux, use it.
I want to use my OS to do my job; I don't want my OS to be my job.
Yeah, when I do something a lot I sometimes bother to learn to do it faster. Otherwise I don’t. I love the high skill ceiling to linux, but I also love that the floor keeps lowering.
I quit years back because the floor was too high. I got back in after it lowered. I use my computer for a lot of things, but I’m not really fucking around with it to fuck around. I have things I want to do, and it’s best when it’s easy to learn how to do them
This was exactly my experience when I switched from XFCE4 to Hyprland. Now I much rather do everything in the terminal. Except for partitioning drives and auto mounting them. I switch to gnome to do that in GUI.
Using nixos I can just rebuild with gnome instead of hyprland. Do what I need. Then rebuild back to hyprland. And gnome is not installed anymore. So I get to use GUI without the bloat of having a GUI installed all the time.
so I give it a try with ArcoLinuxD i3wm and is increible the amount of things I learn the 'hard way' because there was no GUI to do the things I want to do, or maybe I was too lazy to do it with the terminal since there is always the 'easy way'.
Doing things the "easy way" is not "lazy" but thank you for saying the quiet part out loud. This is why there will never be a "year of the Linux desktop", because it's developers insist on doing everything "the hard way". In an ideal OS you never have to learn to do things the hard way because the easy way works just as well without starting a new career in Linux programming.
The problem is, in Linux once you know how things work, most things are pretty easy. In Windows, even when you know how things work, if you want to change your system at all you're fighting the OS the whole way.
For example, in Linux it's trivial to set up my notifications to be in the bottom middle, except when I'm coding to have them in the top right, with various hotkeys to manage them. Or to have custom window layouts. Or to do anything, every part of the stack is easy to change. On Windows you just get a blob and it assumes everybody wants it to work the same way.
Not sure what problems you've had with Windows, maybe some special use-case. The only problems I've had is uninstalling Microsoft's garbage. And of course the two parallel settings menus for some ungodly reason.
I listed two examples of things right in my post.
Do you understand the terms OP used? Did you even read the post? So, OP was doing things the 'easy way' using GUI tools in Gnome/Plasma/XFCE and is now using CLI tools in a window manager that he chose. Please explain to me how does this lead to Linux devs are mean and you need a CS degree to install a browser on Linux.
Do you understand the terms OP used?
I understood the overarching situation well enough. Maybe you'd like to bring up to speed on exactly what your point is.
So, OP was doing things the 'easy way' using GUI tools in Gnome/Plasma/XFCE and is now using CLI tools in a window manager that he chose.
Yes I understood that.
Please explain to me how does this lead to Linux devs are mean and you need a CS degree to install a browser on Linux.
I can't explain it because you just pulled those statements out of your ass.
Please explain to me how does this lead to Linux devs are mean
I don't think. But the Linux advocators are very mean so that their user can't figure out things themselves and always want people to help them.
and you need a CS degree to install a browser on Linux.
(the last paragraph is the main content)
YOU REALLY NEED!
If not, why there are so many post on bad quality websites like itsfoss, tecmint, etc.. and they have to taught you to use your package manager! They have to a bunch of apt-get install EEEEEEEEEEEEE dnf install AAAAAAAAAA and sudo .... .... ......
(while I want apk, doas, ...)
They expect Linux users to be a completely brainless person that will do everything they are told. Those Linux users learn things hardly with this background. So a CS degree is required.
Do you see that such Linux user always complain about "lack of documentation" when they "try" BSDs? Even FreeBSD (they have a forum)?? The documentation of programs and software doesn't hold your hand and teach you on installing something. This effectively render such Linux user unusable, hang.
Some distributions are easier than others. If you use Linux Mint you'll be fine without a terminal.
User experience is never going to be Linux strong suit, it's the ability to customize literally everything. I agree that the year of Linux is never going to happen but things have been improving.
User experience is never going to be Linux strong suit
My point is that Linux devs don't want a good user experience. They just assume that if you're using Linux that you're a software engineer and already know everything.
My point is that Linux devs don’t want a good user experience. They just assume that if you’re using Linux that you’re a software engineer and already know everything.
Wrong. Linux advocators hold your hand and teach you how to install some stuff on debian, how to install some stuff on ubuntu, fedora, how to install centos....
They already did things for you. You are not expected to do "harder" stuff (like programming, configure software with an editor).
But this statement is mostly correct for BSDs, except OpenBSD experience is better, since they have X by default (yeah, NetBSD have X but they don't have SSL certificates in base until 10.0 which is not released; FreeBSD needs you to install X yourselves.). But the general experience on BSDs are much better since their users are much willing to read man pages, unlike "Linux users".
The problem is that "the easy way" will only ever get you 1% of the functionality of your computer because computers are inherently complex machines and you can only make a tiny part of what they can do easy enough to make it accessible to people who are too lazy to learn anything past one or two clicks in a short menu list.
The problem is that "the easy way" will only ever get you 1% of the functionality of your computer
I can do literally everything I have ever needed to do with a GUI in Windows.
Need to do anything in Linux? Well if there is a GUI, it doesn't even matter because all the instructions online send you straight into the terminal.
Doing something as simple as installing Steam is an absolute nightmare.
I installed steam by going into my discover app, searching for steam, and clicking install. This is how I get most things, excepting a few appimages I downloaded that just work. I change my settings via GUIs that came with KDE. The only extra configuration GUIs I installed were pavucontrol (just like it for some reason) and protontricks (for doing weird stuff with games most people never need to do).
I don't know what distro/de/wm you're using right now but what you're saying doesn't need to be the case. Linux desktop is honestly working better than windows for me lately.
Doing something as simple as installing Steam is an absolute nightmare.
Because Linux advocators does not expect you to learn yourselves. In 4% of desktops how many Linux enthusiastic (I mean people that can read man pages and figure out the problem themselves and willing to do programming) there are? I don't think it reached 0.5%. And those people would soon switch to BSD, only some who believe in Linux decided to stay and write some great software that gained popularity (when writing this I'm thinking about sbctl but I have never used such software yet)
This is why there will never be a “year of the Linux desktop”
They dislike this comment just because of this. This statement is correct.
Linux kernel's code quality is not comparable to any BSD's kernel. GNU userland is not as clean as BSD's userland so Chimera Linux existed.
because it’s developers insist on doing everything “the hard way”
true, true
I'm so lucky that WINE and virtualbox is so hard on "newbie distros" that I would never use windows application on linux.
When I switch to BSD I always read man pages and find the docs to resolve my problems. Never did that on Linux.
In an ideal OS you never have to learn to do things the hard way because the easy way works just as well without starting a new career in Linux programming.
Do you think FreeBSD and OpenBSD already met this requirement :)?
The hard way is generally also the fastest way once you're used to it, clicking through menus is frustrating when you know there's a command that'd achieve what you want
i totally get you there! I have been piddling around with proxmox for a month or so now, and learning docker, I don't even have to put portainer on every instance i set up these days!
I am excited for plasma 6 though for sure! I reckon i'll spin up a VM to try it out!
I've been interested in getting into Proxmox. How does it compare to Portainer?
Well,
Portainer puts a GUI on top of running docker. Which lives in the terminal usually.
Proxmox puts a GUI on a Debian Linux build specifically made to stand up VMs and Linux containers, which I then put docker ( and sometimes portainer) on
Proxmox seems awesome!
I see. Thanks! :)
This is why we recommend Linux Mint to beginners!
Yeah, you learned the tiny bits and pieces of a desktop that you took for granted before. Like trays, notifications, locking, screen saver, etc. Just for the learning experience, any daily driving linux users should at least try to setup a fairly functional desktop environment using bare WMs as the base.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0