this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
450 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3158 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randompasta@lemmy.today 30 points 8 months ago

Won't anyone think of the poor oil industry?? How else can we continue to support the industry with little capital to invest in exploration, development, and paying off politicians?

[–] JustUseMint@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

We are so hopelessly corrupt as a nation

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


That tax break proved so lucrative it prompted celebrities like Jimmy Stewart, Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby to become oilmen on the side, buying interests in oil wells and using the deduction to shelter their Hollywood income.

Last year, American companies pumped 13 million barrels each day on average, a record that had made the United States the largest crude oil producer in the world, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Instead of investing in their businesses, the oil and gas companies have poured profits into “stock buybacks, mergers, and acquisitions that benefited executives and wealthy shareholders,” the Biden administration said on a fact sheet accompanying the budget proposal.

“The Biden Administration and their radical climate advisers have disregarded common sense by requesting Congress remove these incentives before we accomplish an energy transition that doesn’t sacrifice reliability and affordability,” Mr. Manchin said in a statement.

“It’s just corporate welfare,” said Joseph Aldy, a professor at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University who served as a special adviser to President Barack Obama on energy issues.

Others note the irony of continued government support for fossil fuels at a time when scientists say nations must rapidly transition away from oil, gas and coal to cut the carbon emissions that are driving climate change.


The original article contains 1,361 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Geez, especially that intangible drilling benefit, needs to go. From the description in that article, that would be a great idea to encourage the risky process of new drilling. I can see how we’d want to do that for most of the last century. However, it should have been the first subsidy to go when we started trying to transition to renewables. Why encourage development of new resources that we’re trying to move away from?

It’s the same thing with new pipelines. Assuming everything remains the same, they’d be a great investment, but we can’t afford to have ebpverything remain the same. Arguably we can’t afford a long enough timeline for them to pay off. Why destroy the environment for a long term investment that we’re trying to stop

[–] Soggytoast@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Starting this year I now have an extra tax I must pay because I use too little oil. 120$ btw

[–] LSNLDN@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s so irrational that he can’t just… do it!? Like wasn’t he elected by Americans to make decisions on behalf of the people, of whom overwhelmingly support sensible decisions like this!?

I know the world is more complex than this but surely we need to unfuck the world like DAMN we’re just going to collapse instead…

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The US government is designed to split power across multiple individials and institutions. So no, he can't just do some things. And changing the tax code is one of them.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Most people don't understand the US government. Not even at a broad "separation of powers" level.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In particular, Congress has the power to levy taxes and allocate budgets. All the President can do is influence, encourage. He has more influence within his own party but they all vote according to their beliefs, and he has very little influence on the opposing party

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We're producing more oil under Biden than any nation in history.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that's something controllable by a single person. Especially given any attempt at regulating the oil industry has been overruled by the authoritarian supreme court.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

He and his supporters brag about it.