this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
215 points (96.1% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2037 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Microplastics have been found in historic soil samples for the first time, according to a new study, potentially upending the way archaeological remains are preserved.

Researchers found microplastics in soil deposits more than seven meters (23 feet) underground, which were deposited in the first or second century CE and excavated in the 1980s, a team led by researchers from the University of York in the United Kingdom said in a statement published Friday.

In total, the study identified 16 different microplastic polymer types in contemporary and archived soil samples, the statement adds.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] p3e7@lemm.ee 56 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Am I reading the article wrong? The plastics come from the storage containers. Therefore the heading is quite misleading.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 44 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

in my reading of the the article it discusses contamination in-situ with environmenal micro-plastics, even in soil samples that were taken from the early 80s (indicating that microplastic contamination has been a problem for a while).

in-situ preservation of artefacts are now being called in to question because microplastics can change the environment around the artefact, leading to damage.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I wouldn’t figure that 16 different types of polymers would be discovered if the storage container were the issue.

Seems more likely that rainwater has been seeping down into the soil carrying the pollutants with it, and even as early as the 80s extracted items already contained a multitude of traces.

We really fucked shit up. That means I’ve never known a world with clean water, air, or soil, and I’m middle aged already.

Fuck do we do now?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Step 1: vote the republiQans out

It's coincidence that the first samples they found microplastics in are from the 80s, but it's also a metaphor.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The cancer of neoliberalism metastasized in 1980 with the election of Ronald Reagan.

Technically speaking Carter was also a neoliberal, but he was the Democratic brand that did things like put solar panels on the White House, because he wasn't a simpering, oil industry boot licking reactionary as well.

[–] flower3@feddit.de 48 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

Sooo it has been here the whole time, carry on… /s

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It seems your /s was not sufficient. Sigh.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I stopped using /s when I leaned that it never really breaks down and you end up with microsarcastics in every thread.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Romans invented plastic, I KNEW IT!

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It was actually the Etruscans. But common misconception...

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Cave drawings by neanderthals in the Fertile Crescent in today's Iraq depict them hunting mammoths and making plastic.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Ah yes, I remember now. Nerf darts are actually derivative of plastic arrows heads that were dated over hundreds of thousands of years ago. The design is neigh indistinguishable from that of our ancestors' nerf arrows.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 2 points 7 months ago

Damn those Romans were good !

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

Nature is healing?

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

EDIT: OP added "/s" to his comment and my comment is no longer relevant. Carry on.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 7 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://m.piped.video/watch?v=rld0KDcan_w

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Next up: Jesus really was made of plastic.

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Breaking news from the astronomy community!......

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Well plastic was oil to begin with.

So it's all ancient dead creatures