this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
194 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19072 readers
5414 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 73 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The only violence I condone is eating the rich.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

And here I thought I'd come in and struggle to convince people it wasn't just conservatives itching for a new civil war.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If the blue collar conservatives would only figure out the rich do not have there best interests at heart there wouldn’t be a war. This is class warfare but most just don’t realize it yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 61 points 7 months ago (10 children)

What a stupid question.

Undoubtedly, violence would solve America's divisions- but is it the best way to do so? The real questions are, how long would that take, who would ultimately be the losers, and would it even be "America" when it all ends?

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

violence

The favorite action of the, Make America Go Away, crowd.

Spreading Managed Democracy, one liberation round at a time!

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

The Congressional Republicans and their Fox News swallowing ilk, who have all decided they love Russia so much, should simply move there.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 56 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The only battle we are currently fighting is rich vs poor and we are loosing badly. All the other culture war issues are a farce.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Republicans trying to ruin the lives of half the population is not a "farce" and I'm insulted you'd simplify your argument to this level. There can be multiple things happening at once.

[–] AEsheron@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's a farce they put on specifically to distract their base from the war on the poor.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

For some republicans in positions of power? Sure. But not for their voter base.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're missing the fact that all those people are beholden to the rich and powerful and have only done their bidding for the last 80 years.

Sure, Republicans are fuckin horrible. But they're this way by the design of the rich who really run things.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (34 children)

Republicans are horrible because of their core beliefs. That there is not good and bad, but strong and weak. That (paraphrasing a wise internet man here) "there are in-groups that the law must protect but not bind, and out-groups that the law must bind but not protect." That they're always right, and that others are always wrong. Rich people use this, but they cannot create it alone.

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 35 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Unironically yes, sufficient levels of violence will solve US divisions.

Anyone that thinks that they genuinely want this though has never lived in a country going through a civil war.

[–] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 7 months ago

Or they lack a shred of empathy and/or imagination.

I've never lived in a country going through civil war, but I don't have to do that to tell you that it's not something I want ever.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If anything happens it won't be a civil war. There is no good geological line to use as a point to start. It will be much more akin to the Troubles of Northern Ireland. Which may be honestly worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

Yeah, the ammo box is literally the fourth box of democracy after the soap box, the ballot box, and the jury box, but it's only to be used when the other three have failed

At the end of the day, might makes right, so we better make damn well sure the side we believe in has more of it

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That figure is probably higher if we talk about gutting rich people. We might even get unity on that instead of divisiveness. I get a MAGA republican in the same room as a democrat and we start talking about wasting rich people, they often start acting like friends.

I'm hoping we can realize who our common enemies are so that we don't get into a civil war.

[–] bashbeerbash@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I feel bad for conservatives. In the, odds are stacked against you, kind of way.

They Would rather hand over their country to billionaires than share it.

They Would rather vote to give socialism and more hand overs to those billionaires, while destroying the middle class which actually made america great. They are Destroying the American Dream they claim to be Saving.

Actually fuck them conservatives. Easy to fool idiots helping Russia and China and Saudi Arabia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

12% of dems and 28% of republicans… that says something

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 7 months ago (29 children)

To be fair, the question was "do you think violence is necessary for the US to get back on track"

Make America Great Again is the Republican line, so of course the poll is going to lean this way.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 19 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Every one of those people imagines the violence happening to groups they don’t like, and not to them and the groups they like. Always remember, both sides thought the civil war would be over in one battle.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fascists fundamentally support political violence as a method for "solving division". Anyone who is not a fascist and supports such violence at this moment needs to understand that political violence is going to backfire and play into the fascist's hands unless you can first build alternative systems of power and support outside of the government.

If you start violence without that network of support in place, you will disrupt people's lives, and the only support structure that can help will be the current Government. The military will be the ones providing food, medicine, and shelter. If you don't have a strategy to get regular people affected by the disruption food, water, healthcare and shelter, you're going to make the government the hero.

If you're not a fascist, and believe political violence is necessary, your first step isn't violence, your first step is to take a page from The Black Panthers and starting a community breakfast program.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They’re going to force us to fight them again, aren’t they.

[–] Snailpope@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I've been saying it for years, war is coming. Best get prepared

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When somebody tells you who they are it's best you believe them.

They've been telling us who they are for decades, and who they are is the unburied remnant of the Confederacy coming back for round 2, because Grant didn't let Sherman finish the job.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

And they already have all the guns they need. This is why gun ownership is growing fastest among Black people, Latinos, and Trans people. I remember this when any gun control ideas come up, because anything you're trying to ban is already in the hands of most of the fascists. I'm fine with gun control, but not poorly implimented restrictions that mostly effect the populations trying to defend themselves. The most dangerous people bought their guns decades ago. They'll pass them down to their kids too.

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 13 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I tell all of my liberal friends that it doesn't matter whether they approve of the practice or not. Own guns or don't, idc, but you better take some classes in how to use them.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

In a country with more guns that people refusing to learn how they work is irresponsible. Knowing how they work and gun safety, and how to make a gun safe, is necessery otherwise in any situation with guns you have all the context that deer has on an interstate. We can do better we can learn and give ourselves the information necessary to make the best available decisions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

For some, the war already started.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Violence meaning guillotines

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (10 children)

Oh no, the country founded by 1%ers who don't want to pat taxes, and built on I disk burial grounds, is full of crazy violent assholes?

I'm shocked!

We aren't Russia (yet), so we must keep trying to facilitate the change we so desperately need.

Imo. That would be switching away from first past the post voting in favor of an alternative voting system like Ranked Choice.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 6 points 7 months ago

I think those numbers are low. I think people were confused. While everyone knows them as indispensable vehicles of egalitarian social progress, guillotines are technically tools of violence.

[–] Starkstruck@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

If we mean the 1%ers? Yeah violence would start solving that issue.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Anyone who believes this should be put in a thunderdome and the rest of us can pay to watch

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I mean... If you got rid of one side of a division, there's no more division so they're not wrong. It's just not a cool way to solve the problem.

load more comments
view more: next ›