this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
126 points (99.2% liked)

Games

16689 readers
495 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
126
US government denies ESRB's AI-powered face-scanning 'age estimation' proposal, but it's probably not gone for good (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 7 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

How about we stop logging the image of every human on the planet under the guise of "security." I've seen how much respect corporations have for security in the annual teardown of hacked company's email and password lists. I'm not interested in you having a copy of my face along with my bank card info, address, birthdate, and full name all underneath an exhaustive arbitration agreement, because when you lose it, I'll be the one that gets fucked, and you'll get another slap on the fucking wrist.

[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Don't forget some states want us to give our government-issued IDs to porn sites. What could go wrong.

Think of the children.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Honestly, I trust the porn sites more than I'd trust the video game makers or like... Banks. At least when it comes to data security.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 3 points 7 months ago

I remember when the new German id was rolled out that it could potentially just tell a website whether the user was an adult or not. But nobody seems to use it for that purpose. From the last time I tried to use my ID to identify myself I must conclude that it simply doesn't work.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

They "don't keep" the pictures, they "permanently delete" them from their servers "immediately" after taking a wild stab at the person's age. Allegedly.

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Beyond idiotic idea, not like it matters most people buy games online now.

[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 7 months ago (3 children)

“You must have a webcam enabled to complete this purchase.”

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hey dad, come over here and stare at the screen for a bit.

Jesus, it's not kids buying these games. It's parents buying them for kids. The only people this would prevent would be removeds, teens who have their own jobs who pay for their own things. And even then, guaranteed they have the guy who buys them beer anyway.

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Alright so am I the only one that thinks it's worse to have removed instead of whatever it was that you actually meant? It's like not showing the monster in a movie, the mind just runs wild ...

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The hell word did you remove

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oh, removed, during the scam attacks that was a common title and I banned it on my instance. I can unban it now that I set up an automod.

Edit. lol. Sixteen year old

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hey dad, come over here and stare at the screen for a bit.

Pfft. No, you just download a sketchy webcam emulator and video of a dude looking into the camera

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

Nah, you just have an AI generate a looped clip of a person and feed that in. I'm ready for the infinity AI feedback loop

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Where's that mountain dew pasta?

[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

Doritos and Dew dew it right.

[–] freebread@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Imagine Microsoft makes the Kinect mandatory again.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

have to do Rasputin dance to log in to MS Teams

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 months ago

I can't wait for kids to be able to bypass parental controls based solely on being able to fool a computer into thinking they're adults, while some adults are unable to bypass parental controls based solely on them having a young looking face

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 7 months ago

Not no but fuck no. I don't give a shit what other people's children do on the internet.

[–] Overlock@sopuli.xyz 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Is that just based on a picture of someone's face?

How about https://thispersondoesnotexist.com ?

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Apparently it needs a live human, and a picture won't work. No, I could not find any info on how they plan to make sure that the image they send to their servers for age guesstimation knows whether the picture is of a real human

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

What happens if you show it your butthole