451
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

House Intelligence Chair Mike Turner (R-Ohio) on Sunday stressed the expansive reach of Russian propaganda and said it has even presented itself on the floor of the U.S. Congress.

In an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union” with Jake Tapper, Turner said he agreed with Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who singled out conservative news outlets and said, “Russian propaganda has made its way into the United States, unfortunately, and it’s infected a good chunk of my party’s base.”

“Oh, it’s absolutely true,” Turner told Tapper about McCaul’s remarks. “We see directly coming from Russia attempts to mask communications that are anti-Ukraine and pro-Russia messages, some of which we even hear being uttered on the House floor.”

“I mean, there are members of Congress today, who still incorrectly say that this conflict between Russia and Ukraine is over NATO which of course it is not,” Turner said. “Vladimir Putin having made it very clear, both publicly and to his own population, that his view is that this is a conflict of a much broader claim of Russia, to Eastern Europe, and including claiming all of Ukraine territory as Russia’s.”

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Vorticity@lemmy.world 66 points 7 months ago

It's nice to see a republican admitting this. It would be better if he would name names and admit that it goes beyond taking the propaganda bait. It would be nice if he would say "Congressman _____" regurgitates Russian propaganda and may be compromised.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Easier to list the complement of that set.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

So all the Maga madmen ?

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago

Yeah biggest duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh of 2024

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 44 points 7 months ago

Surprising to see a Republican actually admit it though. He must be trying to pull a Mitt Romney, and hoping to get some moderate votes, hoping they've forgotten everything he's done to damage the country

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Pretty sure this goes back to Reagan.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Plenty does. Though I'd argue this particularly goes back to the Wall Street putch at least. Fascists in and around the Republican party had their coup plot exposed. And received no punishment for it. Instead one of the implicated parties went on to run for Senate and win. With his son and grandson eventually achieving the presidency. And all but the vaguest of details surrounding the incident completely scrubbed from history.

Our fascists love the modern fascist government of Russia. And want to accomplish similar here. The only reason they disliked the USSR before is because they perceived it as a threat to them. Through a lot of the parties empty rubric of being about and for the people of Russia. And not just another authoritarian power structure like them. Borrowing the terminology of the left. With no real desire or will to carry it out.

[-] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

...I have this odd feeling that I'm about to spend 2 hours down a rabbit hole looking for more information on what you're talking about.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

It's a very shallow hole unfortunately. As I stated, a lot of the details have been scrubbed from history. Wikipedia has the boilerplate here. The only names mentioned are the patsy, MacGuire. And a passing mention of J.P. Morgan. Everything outside of that quickly delves into hearsay, speculation, and conspiracy. Though not the lizard people or Jewish space lazer kind. But the plausible kind that wasn't publicly exposed.

IF it was taught to you in school. The term fascism is never mentioned or connected to it in any way. Just a plot by business guys to take over the government. Textbook fascism, but totally not fascism. And not a big deal.

What's interesting is the New York times reaction to the plot. Initially treating it as if it were a hoax. Later publishing an article about how serious and credible the accusation was. But the only evidence that was ever made public was Smedley Butler turning them in and MacGuire being his contact. We will never know what evidence they saw to convince them.

The best reasoning currently points to this being done as retaliation to FDR trying to pass the new deal. And implicates far more than MacGuire and JP Morgan. Including the likes of Prescott Bush. Who is believed to be their intended final leader. With Butler himself being a patsy and stepping stone to their final goal. It is also reasoned that there were no convictions or punishments made. Because those implicated in Congress were given a pass in return for voting for the New Deal.

Again though that is all reasoning and speculation. Because what the government investigated and what they found was never made public. But as stated the few who saw the evidence found it compelling and serious. Which makes it all the more odd that nothing ever came of it. More so than just a whitewashed footnote in history.

[-] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Holy shit. I actually watched a movie that had The Business Plot as a key part of the...plot. It's called Amsterdam.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Of the last ten years tbh

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 33 points 7 months ago

I don't feel like this headline goes far enough. It's not Congress in general. It's one specific party in Congress. The article calls it out:

Turner said he agreed with Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who singled out conservative news outlets and said, “Russian propaganda has made its way into the United States, unfortunately, and it’s infected a good chunk of my party’s base.”

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

I'd like to hear what the AMD chair has to say before I jump to conclusions.

[-] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

He'll say it faster, for a lower salary, but with a high fever.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

Should we submerge him in mineral oil when he gives his testimony?

[-] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

No, silly, this isn't about the company Intel, "Intel" is referring to the government position "House Intelligability Chair". He translates what the Republican representatives are saying so that the rest of us can understand it.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

Oh, so it's not about Intel? Should we be demanding a reply from NVidia then?

(I ~~think~~ hope, everyone understands it's about intelligence but... them jokes)

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

The Republican Party is infected. Anyone trying to hinder aid to Ukraine is doing Putin’s bidding.

[-] sepi@piefed.social 13 points 7 months ago

Marjorie Taylor Cyclops

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

All this fear of Russian propaganda but nobody in the US government talks about the localized corporate propaganda that’s a far bigger threat to the US and the world at large.

Bernie and AOC used to, but Bernie seems to have given up, and AOC is looking out for her career now. Tulsi Gabbard used to too but I don’t even know what her deal is anymore.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

That is a chair turner.

But seriously, no shit.

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

"The Russian oligarchs are taking over!" - US oligarchs probably

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


House Intelligence Chair Mike Turner (R-Ohio) on Sunday stressed the expansive reach of Russian propaganda and said it has even presented itself on the floor of the U.S. Congress.

In an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union” with Jake Tapper, Turner said he agreed with Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who singled out conservative news outlets and said, “Russian propaganda has made its way into the United States, unfortunately, and it’s infected a good chunk of my party’s base.”

“We see directly coming from Russia attempts to mask communications that are anti-Ukraine and pro-Russia messages, some of which we even hear being uttered on the House floor.”

Turner said the propaganda has made it increasingly more difficult to pass Ukraine aid and to present a clear picture of a battle between democracy and authoritarianism.

“Now, to the extent that this propaganda takes hold, it makes it more difficult for us to really see this as an authoritarian versus democracy battle, which is what it is.

Ukraine needs our help and assistance now and this is a very critical time for the US Congress to step up and provide that aid,” Turner continued.


The original article contains 320 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 38%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

“conservative news outlets”? Isn’t CNN now pretty much a conservative news outlet?

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I believe the CEO taking them that direction has been replaced.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They don’t need to hide it and they aren’t interested in trying. Russia owned the presidency and currently owns a good chunk of our representatives, with a really good shot at owning the presidency once again. I’m not sure how you can get further compromised if you tried. Whatever their objectives, I don’t see how you couldn’t achieve them from this position.

[-] antidote101@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

"infection" politics is probably nota healthy paradigm, and may encourage a certain kind of puritanistic/cleansing fascism.

Better to say Russia has the ear of some congress members, or that their propaganda extends to some, or something more specific like that.

this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
451 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4838 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS