this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
478 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3834 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 103 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So as it turns out, the frustration for not investigating the capital insurrection, and all the funny business leading up to it (and everything between) was in fact real. How anyone can justify not starting an investigation immediately when the capital is violently stormed is beyond me.

Sure, going after the peons is all fine and good, but it was clear as day for a long time nobody was doing jack about Trump and Co. Corruption, and now we have it straight from the horses mouth. Lovely times in this clumtry.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Indeed. I wonder what all the "It just takes time! Merrick Garland is a deity who must not be questioned!" types are now.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FTA

Not only did the complaint and other documents reviewed by Insider say the agent's superiors ordered him to stop working on these leads, but they also said the superiors ordered, in early 2022, that the FBI informant who had provided the best intelligence on Giuliani's activities be "closed" — cut off from further FBI contact. The statement said the order came from the FBI's Foreign Influence Task Force, a headquarters-based unit established by Director Christopher Wray in 2017 and charged with combating foreign influence.

[–] Froyn@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it's the same story from last week. TY for saving me the read.

I can no longer draw a comparison between this and Hunter Biden. This story sounds about right, complain the DOJ isn't prosecuting your enemies while strong-arming them into not prosecuting your allies. The Hunter Biden story has now become a Revenge Porn story where a Republican Committee is persecuting a private citizen.

[–] teft@startrek.website 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh look. It was projection all along.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Wollang@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] overzeetop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Well, not that shocked

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But- but- but- something something Hunter Biden something Twitter!

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

All hunter Biden has to do to be forgotten is suck Trumps dick... Then by some sort of corporate whore magic, any and all of his perceived transgressions will immediately evaporate.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

He didn't pay his taxes and bought a gun illegally. They should be on his side!

[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

"It's highly unfortunate that this statement wound up being leaked and published," said Scott Horton, an attorney representing the whistleblower. "We're in the preliminary stages of a confidential process. I'm unable to make any other comment."

"I'm glad you did this good thing. Also, fuck you if you don't want it public yet, we're publishing it."

😕

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A veteran FBI counterintelligence agent says his supervisor told him to stop investigating Rudy Giuliani and to cut off contact with any sources who reported on corruption by associates of former President Donald Trump, according to a whistleblower complaint obtained by Insider.

The whistleblower told Insider that he was finally ordered to stop investigating Giuliani and the rest of the Trump White House in August 2022, after months of what he said were persistent efforts to frustrate his work, at a meeting with three FBI supervisors at a bureau field office.

As one of the bureau's few Russian-speaking counterintelligence specialists, he maintained a network of overseas sources that had been utilized by agents across the country to investigate everything from money laundering to political corruption, his statement said.

Further up the chain of command, bureau leadership — perhaps intimidated by Trump's "deep state" rhetoric and his treatment of former senior FBI personnel such as James Comey and Peter Strzok — has resisted investigating the former president.

Some FBI agents were reportedly satisfied by an assertion made by Trump's legal team that he'd turned over all his classified documents, and wanted to close the Mar-a-Lago government records investigation down.

The glimpse of one field office provided by the new whistleblower could be more indicative of a risk-averse bureaucracy struggling to balance its law-enforcement duties with its increasingly fragile public image than a politically motivated cover-up.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] newbeni@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Replace Merrick Garland. At this point, he is complicit and should be treated as such.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why we need unbiased and nonpoliticized Inspectors General.

I get that you want to dunk on the person from the other side doing the same thing but that's exactly the issue...if everyone is always leaking that X or Y investigation was suppressed, we won't know what was actually suppressed vs what was abandoned because it wasn't worth investigating.

We need structures in place to report to those in charge of Congressional oversight with enough unbiased information that it can be determined whether there was wrongdoing. Everything else is just playing politics.

But like… I don’t want to dunk on people simply because they don’t agree with my politics (with the pointed exception of fascists).

I do want public officials - regardless of their political orientation - who fuck around and do immoral, unethical, illegal, corrupt, and/or fascistic shit to find out how the inside of the often unforgiving American justice system looks, because they heartily deserve it.

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"The call is coming from inside the White House!"