303
He claimed he was “threatened with termination” after raising concerns with bosses.
Which Boeing apparently takes more literally than other companies.
Is that to say that the whistleblower is going to make a public courtroom 'head shot' against the corporate giant ....
.... or is the whistleblower going to end up with another conveniently timed self inflicted 'head shot' that will end their life.
Yes
Man this guys got some balls coming forward after they literally shot the other guy in the fucking head fml
There's some definitive "do it, you won't" energy here.
Which to be fair, it would look really bad for Boeing if this guy "committed suicide" too. To the point it might actually be safer to be the second guy.
Boeing isn't worried about "looking bad". They'll kill this whistleblower too if they get the opportunity.
There's no way whoever ordered the hit the first time (assuming it really was an ordered hit ... and it probably was) individually is going to want that heat.
It's one of those things that "if one of your acquaintances dies, it's plausible it really was an accident like you said. If people who hangout with you keep dropping ... a lot more eyes are looking at you."
It's probably not a true "company" position to murder whistle blowers, but somebody presumably thought it was in their own best interest.
Never underestimate the profound arrogance of a corporate executive.
And lobbyists and unlimited funds...
Heh, "executive".
I'm thinking maybe a shareholder that lost a lot of money
That seems plausible
They would have to be extraordinarily blatant to murder two people. One person they can get away with, but two people, probably not.
I dont know how much more blatant the last murder could be....
If anything, it only emboldened them to see how little anyone cares
I mean, it could have been a LOT more blatant.
But I agree on your second point.
It's gotten almost zero real public attention.
"One's a backfire, three's gunplay"
- The Way of the Gun
And tomorrow he’ll be found dead in his car with “self-inflicted” wounds.
But seriously…whistleblowers are our modern day sentinels. I have the utmost respect for people willing to expose the truth at significant risk and danger to themselves. I hope I would have the integrity to stand up for what’s right if put into such a position.
Hear, hear. It's easy for all of us armchair patriots to criticize from our nice, safe homes, but whistleblowers, like union organizers, protesters, and conscientious objectors, are actually exposed to genuine risk to life and limb. It takes serious, real world bravery to do that.
BOEING KILLED JOHN BARNETT.
Next week's headline:
Boeing hit new whistleblower after raising safety concerns.
I can do this all day
-Boeing Hitman
Agent 747
Beautiful machines destroyed by idiotic executives
Boeing orders hit after new whistleblower raises safety concerns
Mr. Salehpour is going to need an independent 24/7 security detail lest the same fate befall him as Mr. Barnett
"The issues raised have been subject to rigorous engineering examination under [Federal Aviation Administration] oversight," the company said.
You mean the guy you handed an FAA sash to and told "it would be an awful shame if this didn't get signed off on, we'd have to make some pretty severe job cuts, wink wink?"
737-800 is not the same as a max 8, right?
Because maybe I'm the only weirdo that's doing this, but I end up picking flights that aren't new Boeing aircraft if I can help it.
Wow, these comments are really creative
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
303 points (99.0% liked)
News
23305 readers
3701 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS