220
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 50 points 4 months ago

State Democrat Rep. Rui Xu (D) has demanded to know if the bill could censor a site listing the “top 10 most gay-friendly cities.” He claims the bill is written vaguely, and that Republican lawmakers did not consider the unintentional and sizable consequences that the bill would put into action.

Sigh

No, dumbass. You're either living under a rock or you're an idiot who should be barred from holding office because you're too naive to see it for what it is.

They know it's vague.

They know it'd have a widespread impact on the internet.

That's the whole point.

The intent is to make LGBT topics too toxic for anyone to engage with voluntarily, thereby silencing the community.

Stop letting the slack out. Stop giving them an inch because they always, always will take it a mile. Stop pretending that there isn't darkness hiding under their pleasant demeanor.

[-] wagesj45@kbin.run 29 points 4 months ago

He probably knows all that. Normally all the minority party can do is force these people to state things things out loud and on the record. Besides, things have to be put simply like this because most people put so little thought into what stuff like this means. They have no idea what the legal system is like or how it can be used against them because they just don't pay attention. That's its own problem.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 4 months ago

Pleasant demeanor? What USA are you living in? The one I’m in has wretched, awful scum like Margie and Definitely Real Human Cruiseface. And have you seen our version of theDonBonJovi? I’d like a ticket to your USA, please.

[-] HunterOfGunners@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago

When does Kansas get backhanded for passing unconstitutional laws?

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 25 points 4 months ago

Right after Florida, probably.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

As if Kansas lawmakers actually care about harm to children unless it personally affects them. I will never forget the waterslide incident, allowing parks to self inspect and not adhere to basic safety standards is wild. It wasn't until a politician's kid died that they changed the rules.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verr%C3%BCckt#:~:text=Verr%C3%BCckt%20permanently%20closed%20in%202016,State%20of%20Kansas)%20Scott%20Schwab.

Verrückt permanently closed in 2016 following a fatal incident involving the decapitation of Caleb Schwab, the 10-year-old son of Kansas state legislator (and later Secretary of State of Kansas) Scott Schwab.

After Scott Schwab spoke to his fellow legislators about his son's death and its effect on him, they voted to change the law that had allowed Schlitterbahn to self-inspect, requiring that all the state's amusement park attractions be regularly inspected by the state.

On February 22, 2019, criminal charges were dismissed against [slide makers] ... the law at the time did not require that those standards be followed.

But yeah, get right on protecting those kids from the gays. And not forced conversion therapy, which is legal in most of Kansas from what I can tell.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

But they protect churches from prosecution when they children. We need vote every fucking GOP member out of office and run them out of our country.

[-] nick@midwest.social 13 points 4 months ago

Good luck with that, we all know once they censor something it’s gone forever. 🙄

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 months ago

It’s just like how they outlawed pornhub (ok, not in KS, but still) and now you can’t see boobs.

[-] psion1369@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So is it sites that are specifically lgbtq+, or any site that has content as such? If the later, that's nearly a third of the internet.

Edit: actually read the article. It's any site where the content is considered harmful to minors, including homosexual content. So how much of NetFlix, YouTube, Facebook, etc get banned under this?

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

I consider biblical content harmful to minors.

[-] sygnius@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Well, the Bible does depict acts of sodomy, so it definitely qualifies as a violation.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago
[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago
[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

You have the second amendment, not much more help we can offer.

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
220 points (97.4% liked)

News

22802 readers
3247 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS