this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
1249 points (84.4% liked)

Technology

62854 readers
3883 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] M_Reimer@lemmy.world 650 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Can we just pretend that Twitter no longer exists?

All that Elon Musk still tries here is how far he has to go until Twitter finally collapses.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 316 points 2 years ago (14 children)

Also, can we stop polluting the tech comms with this crap? Why are people posting this stuff here again? We were perfectly fine for awhile with no musk Twitter shit posts.

[–] Spike@feddit.de 93 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Just block it. Wait, no, that "feature" makes no sense.

Non-shitpost: I know everyone is annoyed by now, but Ex-Twitter is a huge website and relevant?

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Relevant to what?

This conversation has had is back and forth far too many times. Twitter spam is not relevant to technology news. Him not blocking people has no barring on any form of new tech. It belongs in the !nomoremuskspam@lemmy.world comms, that's why that was created.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 62 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

YES PLEASE. I fucking swear it genuinely feels like about 15% of the posts here are about Elon.

People need to ignore this prick and move on with their lives

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 220 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Literally every single day we have idiots doing Musk's PR work for free.

Downvote Musk spam. The billionaire doesn't need your help making sure his businesses stay in the 24 hour news cycle.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago (6 children)

You think being inevitably forced to see every bit of harassment and spam is going to make that platform more popular and financially viable? Nah, if anything this is free advertising for Mastodon.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 188 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

What in the actual fuck does he think is going to happen

[–] uwe@lemmy.world 216 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I have him blocked. It's my fault. He noticed and now he is going to axe the whole feature

[–] DarkWasp@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I could actually seeing that being the reason he’s doing this. Nothing a narcissist hates more than people ignoring them.

[–] BrudderAaron@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is PRECISELY the reason. He fired a lead engineer who told him they can't control how many people engage with his tweets. So he made it so that EVERYONE gets to see his tweets in their feed. Queue mass blocking of him and now he's upset.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jsveiga@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 years ago (4 children)

He's going to be able to harass everyone that had blocked him.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I bet he will still be able to block users without them knowing too

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 168 points 2 years ago

"it makes no sense" literally every social media site in existence has the block feature, and the reason is to help people prevent harassment. Elon is like a fucking toddler, it's obvious he just wants to get rid of blocking because he's pissy about being blocked by other people.

[–] Chenzo@lemmy.world 167 points 2 years ago (21 children)

So... Wait.

This means someone can just @ someone else and destroy their feed with hate or dick pics or whatever?!

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds like people should start setting up nasty ass porn bots and have them spam Musk constantly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 125 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The block "feature" is a required tool for being listed on the Google and Apple stores, among others.

Removing it will get Twitter delisted from them as well.

[–] Thee0023@sh.itjust.works 53 points 2 years ago (19 children)

That'd be nice if it actually applied, but Apple has already made exceptions for X among other large companies to allow them to play by different rules in the store. So I'm not holding my breath for any sort of punishment.

Examples:

  • X got a one letter App Store name that was previously against the rules (other devs need their app name to be at least 2 characters) (more info)
  • YouTube had been blocking iOS PiP background playback (not sure if they still do) and put that feature behind the YouTube Premium subscription. Background playback and PiP is part of iOS's system capabilities and the rule specifically says it's not allowed. See Apple's guidelines section 3.2.2 (ii) here. With this, one could make the argument that PiP would only support system supported video decoding, and YouTube uses DASH for higher resolution videos, but YouTube does offer video and audio streams that are natively supported by Apple as well so I don't hold much support for this argument.
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] PBCrisps@lemmy.world 110 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Just stop using Twitter. It's easy.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 109 points 2 years ago
[–] jenniebuckley@lemmy.world 107 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean it's literally in the terms and conditions of both the App Store and Play Store for social media to have a block button lol

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago

Elon complaining about some conspirancy on why their app got taken down for not complying.

[–] stochasticity@lemmy.world 103 points 2 years ago

This is incredibly consistent with the "free speech" crowd thinking free speech entitles you to an audience.

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 97 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Unreal. It's not even incompetence, he really is just tanking the site on purpose.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No he's not.

He's a right wing grifter and always has been. And like many on the right, he views harassment as a form of "free speech" which should be acceptable.

He's not tanking the site on purpose. He's tanking it because his bullshit ideology naturally results in creating a hostile environment that people don't want to be a part of.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 82 points 2 years ago (8 children)

The block feature is not there out of the goodness of their CEO's heart.

It is there to limit liability from harassment. After all, why police harassment laws at your expense. When you can get the end user to enforce it for you.

It's just Dumb evil.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago (12 children)

This is so dumb, what is he thinking? What's the angle?

Dumbness aside, Twitter is only usable if you block all of the blue check spammers who add nothing to any discussion.

Maybe he's doing it so you can't block blue checks? But it still doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 68 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Lmao this is going to be incredible to watch unfold. I am assuming Elon himself has blocked an absolute fuckton of accounts that are just out to troll him, so either he’s gonna (rightly) get absolutely inundated by trolls, or he’s gonna make the devs disable it for everyone except him and whoever else he wants to give that feature to.

[–] notatoad@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yeah, elon's not going to see the negative consequences of this personally, because he'll just use the "ban" button instead of the "block" button.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shashi154263@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Yup. X makes no sense. Please delete it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] st33lb0ne@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I cant wait for Twitter/X to cease to exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

“Mr. Billionaire Tech Company CEO, what was your detailed reasoning for the removal of a highly important feature that benefits way more users than the ones it harms?”

“It makes no sense”

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PenguBlue@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hasn't Elon blocked people before tho? And even been public when blocking some people?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oryx@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just when you think he's run out of stupid decisions to make, he does it again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 46 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Huh, I have never been a fan of blocking people, but this is a very dumb move, normal Twitter news of course.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Blocking people is essential, I've blocked tons of people and communities on here already

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] donuts@kbin.social 41 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I recommend just blocking the entirely of Xwitter. Your life will be better off.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Smacks@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (10 children)

He'll make it a premium feature

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 40 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is this man actually retarded or is he trolling us? Seems like he's intentionally shitting on Twitter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He is actually, seriously saying "I don't get it, so it must be bad/unnecessary"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He is really attempting to run it into the ground isn't he?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›