5

Yes, I know that it still exist, and yes, decentralized currency which utilizes distributed, cryptographic validation is not actually a strictly bad idea, but...

Is the speculative investment scam, which crypto substantially represented, finally dead? Can we go back to buying gold bars and Pokemon cards?

I feel like it is, but I'm having a hard time putting my finger on why it lost its sheen. Maybe crypto scammers moved on to selling LLM "prompts?" Maybe the rug just got pulled enough times that everyone lost trust.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dust4ngel@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

you can’t get a real discussion of crypto here because downvotes are impossible and the simps are legion

[-] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago
  • As an actual currency, it's functionally useless. Even if every retailer on the planet were to accept it, the overhead for making the transaction is just a non-starter

  • Because of that, it's entirely just funny money. Even further, since it's entirely a virtual asset, if the power goes out, your wallet goes with it

  • The environmental impacts are horrifying. This fact alone means that it should all be eradicated. Destroying the planet for Internet funny money isn't an acceptable proposition

  • For a decentralized currency, people sure do love centralizing under large exchanges, and the massive losses, thefts, fraud, etc. have shown that no matter how "decentralized" it's supposed to be, it's still susceptible to the same bullshit as any other currency

  • Its high profile association with grifters, scammers, malware, and dark web shenanigans has completely soured its image in the public mind

  • It's entirely a speculative investment scam now. There's no way to decouple it from that.

[-] Aetherion@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Funny how people are creating bullshit by taking about things they don’t know.

Hint: Blockchain is more than just currency and when your centralised e-mail server is taken down with all of your e-mail's, than you will think back at people who did the switch to decentralisation.

Another hint: Ethereum did lower its CO2 emissions by 99%, just by changing its code. Can your 100% virtual currency, parked at your favorite bank in a country like sweden, where there is no cash anymore, do the same?

[-] Sodis@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Some of these points are not inherent properties of cryptos, like the environmental impact and the transaction overhead.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

I have a few bitcoin that I got when it was new, and I was playing around with it; then I forgot about my coins until it exploded and made it into the public (non-tech) news. I luckily still had my wallet, and I bought a quite expensive watch with Bitcoin when it was near its price peak. The transaction was no more difficult than using Paypal. I could have bought a lot of things; at one point, I could have bought a car with it. There are many vendors who'll accept Bitcoin even today. So, regardless of your other points, saying that it's funny money that you can't buy anything with is simply false. It's worth what people will pay for it, just like the American dollar, or gold, or the artificially inflated price of blood diamonds.

I don't think promoting falsehoods helps any argument. If that one is obviously wrong, what about your other points? Lots of people want cryptocurrency to fail. Lots of people want to maintain the hegemony of the US dollar. Some people even have valid criticisms of proof-of-work cryptocurrencies, and the giant farming installations. It's certainly something to discuss, as long as it's kept to facts.

[-] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

The issue with retail is how long it takes for a bitcoin transaction to be confirmed. The overhead simply isn't feasible. A vendor isn't going to sit around an wait an hour for confirmation that payment has been received. A private seller might not care. But a company that processes millions of transactions per day isn't going to deal with that. It has nothing to do with the belief in it and its worth.

And yes, let me be perfectly clear: I absolutely do want cryptocurrency to fail. That's not about being a shill for government hegemony. It's about there being literally no inherent good in it, either in principle or in practice. From the fact that it consumes more energy than entire countries and pumps more CO2 into the atmosphere than entire major industries, to the environmental impact of increased mining for rare earths, increased manufacturing strain, and supply chain disruption due to the demand for the chips to drive the miners.

Also I really don't appreciate your passive aggressive way of calling me a liar

[-] sxan@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

Your position was clear.

I'm not sure how else you'd prefer someone to call out untruths that you've posted. It's either calling you a liar, or some version of saying you're talking out your ass, or what not. But you're right, that's what I was saying. FWIW, I don't think it's lying the way Trump lies; I think there's just a lot of uninformed knee-jerk reactionism. For example, you talk about processing times; have you ever heard of Lightning? It's a crypto used a lot in Nostr and which has instant transfer times.

My point is that I you're arguing a point that is easily refuted, when you have other points that are reasonable and justifiable. I could argue against the other points, too; for example, I could bring up proof-of-stake crypto-currencies which do not have huge energy use, and which haveno more energy footprint than the SSL transactions that you're using constantly, every day. But it would be a harder arguement for me to make because the original cryptocoin, Bitcoin, is proof-of-work and has had a huge eco impact.

And I might not try to argue that unless I thought you were open to discussing the topic in good faith. Which I don't believe you are; I think you've already made up your mind on the topic, and now all that's left is evangelism.

I do have a question, though: do you understand how blockchains work, and the what the various kinds of proofs are? Not in the "could you program it" sense, but in general, like could you describe how they work to someone over beer? Or have you just read a lot about how bad they are? How much of your opinion is based on your social media filter biases?

[-] Dymonika@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what I was gonna say: @davehtaylor must have no idea of the nearly-cost-free Layer 2 network.

Additionally, how much money does it take to power banks? All the staff, the electricity, the Brinks armored cars, the accounting for all that cash, the safety deposit boxes and all of their contents and insurance... Does he think ACH transfers or, worse, checks or money orders, are free on an environmental level? How is USD with all of its nonstop-growing debt safe in any long-term way?

[-] lovesickoyster@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

not really. the stupid stuff, like nfts, are dying, but the rest is still the same.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Nah. This happens every few years, has been since 2014. Buy a GPU before they rise up and use all of our electricity again. An new SBF will crash it sometime.

[-] Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It is humming along nicely for those that use it. There could be another speculative pump filled with scams, that would be no surprise.

[-] mahutiburger@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] schizanon@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Weak hands got shaken out, and the economy is teetering on recession. When inflation stops and interest rates fall, and quantitative easing starts back up it's gonna come roaring back. The SEC and CFTC aren't trying to kill crypto, they are just trying to decide who's jurisdiction it falls under. The crypto industry will benefit from regulation, it will get safer, and you'll feel like an idiot for asking this question instead of buying while it's cheap. Hit me up in 2025!

[-] catboss@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I am not sure if you are actually drinking the Kool-Aid or if this is some top tier shit posting. If it's the latter, kudos to you!

[-] Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I find it odd people who want their social media decentralised but are disgusted when money is decentralised.

[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

No, the market is down. stocks are down.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

It will never die. I believe it will wax and wane over the years. Being incredibly anonymous and deregulated means it will always be a great place for the evil doers to manipulate the market and make money off of it. Because of that there will always be some people using it.

I think one of the biggest failings of cryptocurrency in general is that people view it as a replacement for cash or debit cards when in reality with how slow and expensive the transactions are it is more of a replacement for clearing houses. When you get money sent to your bank you can use it right away because the bank trusts you and provides that service but the money isn't truly there yet. You may have heard the phrase of "the check cleared" or something similar. It takes a long time for those processes to complete and crypto is faster than it.

[-] Ebuall@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe people understood, that instead of freedom as advertised, crypto brings out even more oppressive forms of capitalism.

[-] Mandy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

it should be

[-] Wander@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago

Nope. I use it on a weekly basis to pay for stuff on the internet. It's got its uses and the concept is sound. What you're talking about is the hype train that happens ever so often.

[-] Geo_bot@dataterm.digital 1 points 1 year ago

I'm glad to see that paying for things is still an option. What I really hope for is that the future of crypto is all payments and the investors fuck off

[-] SaintLunatic@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

What do you use crypto to pay for on the internet every week?

[-] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't you like to know, fedboi.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

"Did you know if you ask me if I'm a cop that I legally have to answer you truthfully if I'm a cop? So relax! What do you spend it on?"

[-] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

In the US each time crypto is traded it needs to be reported.

I got free crypto from Coinbase. Then sent it to a wallet, then sold it. So each transaction needed to be reported. It’s too troublesome to be worth it.

Also, if I buy crypto, they have a week hold before I can move it. My idea was to buy crypto in country A and sell it in country B to quickly transfer money between the two countries I live in. Also it would help me beat the bank fees.

But the 7 day hold kinda defeats the purpose of quickly transferring money.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Just download your transaction CSVs from Coinbase and throw them into a Git repo.

[-] LootGoblin42@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

No. Bitcoin is the future of money. It really is the best form of money humanity has invented so far. People just need to stop trading shit coins.

[-] Schooner@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah man, keep huffing that copium.

Bitcoin has no long term plan for actually securing its chain. The fees don't add up to enough and the throughput is abysmal. Lightning is centralised and was disrupted because of chain congestion due to Ordinals.

Keep dreaming!

[-] Kay_Angel@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

Do you use Bitcoin in real life?

[-] neutronst4r@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do you use any gold in real life to pay for stuff?

[-] goatmeal@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

bitcoin will never be the dominant global currency. it couldn't even maintain its position as the dominant darknet currency. bitcoin is not perfect and you are part of a religious cult that bans people for pointing out its shortcomings.

[-] BurningnnTree@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

I know one crypto bro IRL. He acknowledges that it's all just a pyramid scheme, but he enjoys it because it's like gambling but with more strategy involved I guess.

[-] fades@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Would you also consider GameStop’s NFT marketplace for games part of a pyramid scheme?

Or maybe what F1 is doing to evolve how they handling ticketing? Here’s a recent follow up on F1’s NFT ideas I came across recently.

It’s… just not all a pyramid scheme. To say it’s all a pyramid scheme is missing the forest for the trees. It’s n o t

[-] tinselpar@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago

Maybe crypto scammers moved on to selling LLM “prompts?”

The A.I. "Grift Shift" is Underway

[-] CamilleMellom@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting article! I wholeheartedly agree with every other topic but I partly disagree on the AI front. AI has a topic is much wider than crypto and nfts, and better defined than the meta verse. It has concrete uses from document extraction, to protein prediction, and data analysis. However, where I agree with the author is that, on platform like LinkedIn, you find so many quacks who are suddenly experts, telling how AI is the game changer that you didn’t know for something completely unrelated. There is a va lot of pseudo science and false (but seemingly logic) conclusions thrown around. And that’s where the gift is: not in the technology, but in the marketing by scammers.

E.g. they keep on pushing that, as an expert, AI will replace you unless you adapt and that only those who use ai will survive. However, early research shows the opposite and that using AI actually help low performers and has little impact for experts. Here is an interesting podcast on it

[-] joelthelion@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

Bitcoin is still around 30k a pop, so I wouldn't say it's dead yet. But I foresee a big crash in the months or years to come: the hype has passed, and the real uses of crypto are very few. It's also not a good investment since the expected returns are 0. Once people finally realize that, I see the price falling to 1k or even less.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

expected returns are 0

That's the same thing with gold though. There are other reasons to invest in something than just returns. Some folks want something to maintain its value. Bitcoin being deflationary is supposed to be a good hedge against inflation. (But it's far to volatile to really serve that purpose in my opinion.)

[-] joelthelion@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Well, gold has the added benefit that it has served this purpose for thousands of years.

Would you really count on an extremely complex electronic currency requiring a distributed array of machines to get you through a major crisis?

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

You mistake me, I'm not saying Bitcoin is better than gold. I was just pointing out that returns are not the only reason.

[-] Aetherion@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

You know that this was being said multiple times in the last 10 years?

[-] Contend6248@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I was there when it hit $50 and said that the bubble has to pop soon, so at what time are we accepting crypto coins as just an alternative if you want to gamble?

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37601 readers
488 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS