this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
86 points (87.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35723 readers
2101 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Let me explain the question:

If fox news and religious propaganda are exactly that, propaganda, then they are victims.

If, however, every person is free to listen to what they want and then rant against liberals, migrants, Muslims, Arabs, trans, gays, atheists, you name it, then they are just gullible.

I’d have more patience for a victim than a gullible person.

Everybody is free to believe what they want to believe. What I don’t get is why they have to stir things up and why they believe they are the only ones getting it and everyone else is dumb, woke, a communist or is going to hell. Why can’t they keep their opinions to themselves?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 65 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it's an "or" situation. They are both.

This is the answer.

In many ways people are the product of their surroundings. Even if these people are "just gullible", that's because they don't know any better, which makes them victims also.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Maybe I'm missing some nuance of the word but if they believe the stuff because they are gullible... isn't that what makes them the victim?

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 25 points 6 months ago

The gullible often become victims. I don't understand the distinction you're making. Between personal failing and societal failing? They feed into each other. Both warrant correction.

[–] Name-Not-Applicable@kbin.social 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It happens with liberals, too. Having said that, people really do need to go outside, get away from the 24/7 media feed, talk to actual people, and apply some critical thinking on their own. None of us is the main character.

[–] Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm the main character, obviously, why else would the sun revolve around the earth? Purely to honor me the main character, reincarnated in this dying world to save it from the demon lord known as See Oh Too, and its generals Shell, BP, and Chevron. /S

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 months ago

save it from the demon lord known as See Oh Too, and its generals Shell, BP, and Chevron.

HOORAY!

/S

...oh :(

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 18 points 6 months ago

I'd put them on the same level of victimhood as followers of people like Charles Manson. They probably wouldn't have done what they did without his influence but they're still culpable for the damage they've caused.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

People should grow up and take responsibility for their lives.

That's the main thing.

A grown up, responsible person can have opinions, and can change their opinions.

A grown up, responsible person can spend their day as they want, and can also understand that it is probably unhealthy to watch news a whole day long.

A grown up, responsible person can utter a rant when it feels neccessary, and can also apologize afterwards if someone got hurt from it.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

People should grow up and take responsibility for their lives.

We SHOULD all get free unicorns too.

But if you actually want to fix the problem, as opposed to just should'ing it, that requires that we see these people as victims. And this means we don't blame the victim, we help them with their situation.

The wonderful part about the train of thought that you've started, is that eventually you realize that people not only need to take responsibility for their own lives, but also need to take responsibility for the society they impose on other people's lives. And if we're unhappy with that society, we have to actively do something about it. That is our responsibility. Just as much as it's our responsibility to fix ourselves.

[–] emptyother@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Should. But its not like we can force them to grow up and become responsible.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But its not like we can force them to grow up

But should you?

Are you responsible for their life?

[–] emptyother@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

No. But I am responsible for my own and my friends and family's safety.

So what is right, is it to let these be free to indoctrinate themselves into hating me and my fellow humans and spreading harmful beliefs until theres no room for our kind? Or is it to police what they are allowed to consume and become the fascist I didnt want these gullible fools to become? Also if we did, how long until someone turned it around on us: Declared themselves the less gullible ones and worthy of policing what we should watch?

Assuming most humans means well and want good, we'd always outnumber and outvote those who are fool enough to believe in the hate. But seeing politicians who demonstrately and openly want the worst towards certain people, somehow manage to get voted into leadership of one of the most influental countries in the world.. It has shaken my belief in that tolerance will win out in a democracy.

[–] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

People should grow up and take responsibility for their lives.

This is something on I don't agree at all with liberals. When people are manipulated by cult-like technique (or even (social) media optimized to give their brain a fix of dopamine) it's not about their individual responsiblity but the responsiblity of the assholes manipulating them.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

This is something on I don't agree at all with liberals.

Is it only liberals in your country who think so?

[–] JesterIzDead@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

Or are they bigots looking for confirmation bias?

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think the "people are free to believe what they want to believe" is a mistake. This is the very statement that relativitises opinions and belief systems with facts and creates the illusion that they are all equal.

Look at the "facts don't care about feelings" crowd that believe wholeheartedly that statements pandering to their feelings are facts and disregard any actual facts as fake news. I don't think it's because they decided one day to pick and choose what is a fact and what is not, but they actually can't tell that there is a difference in opinions, beliefs and facts in the first place.

People need to accept that sometimes the truth is painful, that it contradicts what you want it to be, and worst of all - that you may have been wrong.

Edit: that said, I think people are free to believe whatever they want to believe when it comes to unprovable existential esoterica like personal values, afterlife, religion, whatever. As long they accept it is a personal belief and not an universal truth.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

"willing victimhood" is certainly a thing.

[–] kashifshah@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago

Being abnormally gullible can be a symptom of some types of mental health issues. Extremely gullible people, especially, deserve compassion.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

Does their gullibility somehow diminish their victimhood? Gullible doesn't mean they're malicious, it just means they're easily misled. If anything, if they're "just gullible" we should be even less hostile towards them, and more towards the propaganda machine (because it is) that's feeding them their misinformation.

[–] macrocarpa@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Tldr "In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony god's blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my intelligence"

[–] Tehhund@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Blame is not a finite resource. Just because 2 people are involved doesn't mean they're both 50% to blame — they can both be 100% at fault.

So to answer your question, the person is responsible for their onerous views. They chose to watch that trash and believe it. We can have compassion for them without absolving them of blame. At the same time, they are a victim of the people lying to them. So it's fine to blame the person consuming the bullshit and the person producing the bullshit, and the fact that there are 2 people to blame doesn't make either of them any less to blame.

[–] thezeesystem@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

there a victim as not everyone is the same and there's always unknown mental disorders some people have or exposed to lead that fucked there brain up, poor childhood, other reasons.

People are not born evil. Nobody just is born and wants others to die. All of it is a learned trait and often times from these organizations is how these evil things spread.

They are gullible because there a victim of The propaganda and what they learned (usually by force without consent) growing up.

Saying people are dumb or need to "grow up" just is another way to put it into aggressive "us vs them" mindsets.

Nobody is born to be evil or cruel. No body. It is learned behavior and we should destroy the organization and practices that create these behaviors regardless of what political side there on. (Although conservative ones have the absolute worst ones though)

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Don't know that I'd characterize it as being "victims", their media outlets have chosen to fuel anxiety and anger that was already there.

The media is culpable for pouring fuel on the fire, but the fire was already there. They are emboldened to be loud since they find such loud agreement from media and online, but they already were thinking the same basic things.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Why would you think they all do it for the same reason?

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Think that anyone who would find that stuff compelling is not in a good place emotionally or mentally. Now, ideally they should be pulled out of that, and you do occasionally hear stories about people leaving extremist groups like Qanon because they found a healthy hobby or community. On the other hand, I don't think humans can really be separated cleanly between victim and victimizer, and the people this questions describing often become a danger to other people.

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

They are falling for engagement strategies all news media outlets use. They will say things that pander to a specific group pointing the finger at the other side so you'll stuck with their station. Both liberal and conservative sites do this. Journalism is dead

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

discussions like this always bring me back to the Dead Kennedy's song Stars and Stripes of Corruption

Not only is the music one of their greatest, but the lyrics are Jello Biafra's best. If you have never heard it, imagine surf guitar, fast pace and a poet that can unleash lyrics at bullet speeds while staying in tone and driving the beat. The end of their career finale and IMO their magnum opus. The lyrics are just so good. Here is one part that I really think about alot...

But what can just one of us do

Against all that money and power trying to crush us into roaches?

We won't destroy society in a day

Until we change ourselves first from the inside out

We can start by not lying so much and treating other people like dirt

It's so easy not to base our lives on how much we can scam

And you know it feels good to lift that monkey off our back

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Too great a tune not to include a link for the uninitiated!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=983DwAOCXRI

The end of their career finale

Apart from Bedtime for Democracy (SaSoC is on Frankenchrist) ;-)

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bedtime is good but it's the post breakup album haha so does it really count?

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Fair point :-)

[–] Jafoo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

"If somebody spends the whole day watching fox or religious propaganda, gets worked up and all he can think of is owning a liberal or converting an unbeliever, is this person a victim or just gullible?"

Neither. Such folks (Along with their "enemies" on the opposite end of the sociocultural continuum, who get all of their intell from The Daily Show and Vox)are case studies in the willfull devolution of modern humans. The sooner all of them guzzle down a gallon of Draino each, the saner this planet will be

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

People affected by confirmation bias are NEVER VICTIMS.

[–] Caitlyynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why can’t they keep their opinions to themselves?

Freedom of speech?

"Why don't you keep your non cis het stuff to yourself" is something I hear often from that side. We should be better than that

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Freedom of speech guarantees the federal government won't be able to mete out punishment for speech. It does not mean that anyone can say whatever, wherever, whenever. Social consequences for speech are fair game, as long as those consequences don't themselves rise to misdemeanor or crime.

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They're a gullible victim.

[–] Scrof@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Stupidity is a moral flaw, not an intellectual one.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

They aren't victims, but they wish they were. They're awful people who want to be openly awful to others to feel better about themselves, and fox "news" lets them indulge their awful impulses and emboldens them to be the awful people they want to be. Then when they get confronted for being awful, they play the victim instead of learning to live and let live.

Obviously this isn't true of all fox viewers or religious people, but I have been thinking about this lately as our new dynamic. It's not supposedly about the best way to help people anymore (and what we can/can't or should/shouldn't do), it's now one side that still supposedly wants to help people and one that has given up the pretense entirely and only stands for cruelty.

load more comments
view more: next ›