156
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Republicans are using a narrative of chaos and ‘philosophical divisions on Israel’ among Democrats to sink Biden’s campaign

Republicans have identified recent college protests against Israel’s war in Gaza as the core of an election campaign narrative of chaos that they hope can be used to sink Joe Biden’s presidency.

The approach was bluntly crystallised by Tom Cotton, the Republican senator Arkansas, in a recent television interview when he mocked the encampments that have sprung up in recent weeks as “little Gazas” and lambasted the president for a perceived failure to unequivocally denounce instances of antisemitism.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

So what's new? The right inserted provocateurs into BLM demonstrations to create violence and bad press. This time their provocateurs prime aim is to alienate Biden voters. It is so easy to lead people.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Just look at Lemmy. There's tons of anti-Biden posters who twist everything with misinformation and deception

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 27 points 5 months ago

That's what happens when the establishment uses their stranglehold over mainstream media to strong arm a primary. The right wing is going to right wing, and misinformation is their whole game. Democrats can learn to be a party that can win in that environment, or they can let institutional inertia destroy the country. They seem to be leaning to the latter.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yup. They’re using the same voter disengagement strategies that Republicans have used for decades. It’s never about how great Trump is. It’s always about how you should just stay home in November because Biden sucks too.

Abstaining from voting will lead to Trump’s second term. Inaction is action.

Edit: The downvotes without rebuttal are proof of this statement.

[-] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice

-- Rush

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Perfect. RIP Neil.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Abstaining from voting will lead to Trump’s second term. Inaction is action

And boy do they get butthurt when you point out that there are only two choices that are realistically possible, and not voting or voting third party inherently favors republicans.

Let's not forget that the left abandoning the democrats in the 70s and 80s didn't make the party move left, they moved right and we got 3rd way dems.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

That’s exactly what we should expect to happen. Inversely, if Democrats maintained control for extended periods of time, all candidates would be forced to adopt more progressive platforms in order to capture more of the vote. Every time liberals and progressives abstain and Republicans take office, the impact is twofold.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Agreed. It's really sad how many people are unwilling or unable to think about 2nd and 3rd order consequences to actions.

[-] Oofnik@kbin.social 13 points 5 months ago

"Everyone that disagrees with me is a shill"

Listen, I'm going to hold my nose and vote for Biden in November because a Trump victory risks the end of democracy in the US, but I'm so tired of this idea that all criticism of him, and anyone who disagrees with us about whether to vote for him, is a victim of some kind of conspiracy.

That isn't to say that people don't want to exploit those divisions and will try to spread misinformation to do so, but that isn't an excuse to dismiss everyone you disagree with either.

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 4 points 5 months ago

In a normal media environment I’d agree with you completely, the problem is that we have a media apparatus that is set up as a propaganda arm of a political party and mainstream media thinks that balance is that any negative news story must be balanced by a negative news story in the other direction (“Trump incites riot and Biden mispronounced his granddaughters name, why both could mean the collapse of their campaigns” type coverage), instead of being balanced in standards of reporting.

I don’t know what the solution is. My strategy though is to work down ballot to get better people in positions to push Biden and get him more flexibility to make better choices and changes.

[-] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I think Biden is far from perfect. I straight up disagree with him on a few things. I'd say he actually kinda sucks in some ways. But at the end of the day, he's gotten a lot more done in closer to the right direction than I ever would've expected, and the other viable option to vote for will undo that and steer things in the wrong direction if elected.

We just can't let good be the enemy of perfect. Biden is the only option for any hope of a positive future. A lot of the posters you're talking about are bad faith actors, and their whole goal is convincing some people to stay home in November. 2020 went to Biden by only like 30k people across a handful of states, so it's pretty clear that they want to dissuade people who are somewhat on the fence to chip away at that difference. They know that trump is polarizing af and even with the electoral college tilting in their favor, they need to pretend that Biden is polarizing too.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 6 points 5 months ago

Biden does anything good: "Oooh where was all this for the last 4 years?"

Gets tiring to see.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah the "gEnOcIdE jOe" are the worst simpletons.

[-] Rottcodd@kbin.social 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

When Tom Cotton says "little Gazas," what he means is "little communities of people I reflexively hate and want to see die, and you should hate them and want to see them die too."

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

“The Democrats have deep philosophical divisions on Israel,” Cotton told ABC’s This Week programme. “That’s why you see all those little Gazas out there on campuses where you see people chanting vile antisemitic slogans … For two weeks, Joe Biden refused to come out and denounce it. That is the 2024 election.”

Do any of the people who picked apart Biden’s concern about disorder with MLK quotes want a crack at decrypting this enigma?

Republicans have vilified protesters for close to a century. Maybe it’s time to stop complaining about imperfect messages and start looking the outright lies in the face.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

What a bizarre fantasy these Republicans live in. Biden flew to Israel immediately to meet Israeli victims. He still hosts their families at the White House even this month. He has never comforted a single Palestinian family despite Palestinian Americans being killed in hate crimes since October. Instead, he thought it was helpful to go on TV and say he has zero trust Palestinians aren’t lying. (It’s reported he privately said he meant Hamas and not all Palestinians but he never apologized publicly). He bypasses Congress to ship more weapons to Israel despite the laws requiring him to stop shipments in the event of war crimes being committed, which his own state department is aware of.

Despite doing more for Israel than anyone, even undermining Obama’s Palestine policies, they’re still trying to paint him as some raging anti-Semite?

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Since when have facts ever mattered to republicans?

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago
[-] Jafoo@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Progressives rammed an ice pick through their own skulls several times over, by failing to endorse free expression. The same arguments they used("Your words make us FEEL like this isn't a Safe Space") are now being employed by Tucker Carlson's and some other loser named Prager's congregations of cocksuckers

this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
156 points (90.6% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3354 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS