705
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fpslem@lemmy.world 138 points 5 months ago

tab grouping

Sure, okay.

vertical tabs

To each their own.

profile management

Whatever, it's fine.

and local AI features

HOLLUP

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 181 points 5 months ago

We’re looking at how we can use local, on-device AI models -- i.e., more private -- to enhance your browsing experience further. One feature we’re starting with next quarter is AI-generated alt-text for images inserted into PDFs, which makes it more accessible to visually impaired users and people with learning disabilities. The alt text is then processed on your device and saved locally instead of cloud services, ensuring that enhancements like these are done with your privacy in mind.

IMO if everything’s going to have AI ham fisted into it, this is probably the least shitty way to do so. With Firefox being open source, the code can also be audited to ensure they’re actually keeping their word about it being local-only.

[-] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Don't you need specific CPUs for these AI features? If so, how is this going to work on the machines that don't support it?

[-] sacredbirdman@kbin.social 60 points 5 months ago

Nope, they can use your NPU, GPU or CPU whatever you have.. the performance will vary quite a bit though. Also, the larger the model the more memory it needs to run well.

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

With it being local it’s probably a small and limited model. I took a couple courses on machine learning years ago (before it got rebranded as “AI”), and you’d be surprised at how well a basic image recognition model can run on the lowest-spec macbook from 2012.

[-] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 29 points 5 months ago

Tbh the inversion of typical intuition that is LLMs taking orders of magnitudes more memory than computer vision can mess people unfamiliar up on estimates of the hardware required

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 22 points 5 months ago

You only need lots of precessing power to train the models. Using the models can be done on regular hardware.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 92 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

While I dislike corporate ai as much as the next guy I am quite interested in open source, local models. If i can run it on my machine, with the absolute certainty that it is my llm, working for my benefit, that's pretty cool. And not feeding every miniscule detail about me to corporate.

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 5 months ago

I mean that's that thing. They're kind of black boxes so it can be hard to tell what they're doing, but yeah local hardware is the absolute minimum. I guess places like huggingface are at least working to try and apply some sort of standard measures to the LLM space at least through testing...

[-] grue@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

I mean, as long as you can tell it's not opening up any network connections (e.g. by not giving the process network permission), it's fine.

'Course, being built into a web browser might not make that easy...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 18 points 5 months ago

Focus on "local". Mozilla is working since a while on that.

[-] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

I tried one of their test builds. Seems like the AI part just means the browser can integrate with llamafile (Mozilla’s open source solution for running open source llm’s with just one file on any platform)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 129 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If you're here because of the AI headline, this is important to read.

We’re looking at how we can use local, on-device AI models -- i.e., more private -- to enhance your browsing experience further. One feature we’re starting with next quarter is AI-generated alt-text for images inserted into PDFs, which makes it more accessible to visually impaired users and people with learning disabilities.

They are implementing AI how it should be. Don't let all the shitty companies blind you to the fact what we call AI has positive sides.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

They are implementing AI how it should be.

The term is so overused and abused that I'm not clear what they're even promising. Are they localizing a LLM? Are they providing some kind of very fancy macroing? Are they linking up with ChatGPT somehow or integrating with Co-pilot? There's no way to tell from the verbage.

And that's not even really Mozilla's fault. It's just how the term AI can mean anything from "overhyped javascript" to "multi-billion dollar datacenter full of fake Scarlett Johansson voice patterns".

[-] chrash0@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

there are language models that are quite feasible to run locally for easier tasks like this. “local” rules out both ChatGPT and Co-pilot since those models are enormous. AI generally means machine learned neural networks these days, even if a pile of if-else used to pass in the past.

not sure how they’re going to handle low-resource machines, but as far as AI integrations go this one is rather tame

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Vitaly@feddit.uk 107 points 5 months ago

People that wanted vertical tabs must be really excited

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 57 points 5 months ago

Anything to fill all that absolute wasted space from every website formatting things to fit phones and not desktops. Ultra wide really sucks ass for a lot of things.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

IMO that's mostly a window-management problem, not an app layout problem. The point of an ultra wide monitor setup (other than flight sims or something) is to be able to view a bunch of different things side-by-side.

Edit: speaking of which, now that we've come almost full-circle from no tab support, to multiple tabs in the same process, to one process per tab, it seems to me that tabs themselves ought to be part of the window decoration, not the app. I mean, they're useful for almost everything you might want to have multiples of (editors, file managers, terminals, etc.) so why force every app maker to implement them over and over again?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Its honestly the only reason i use brave and edge over Firefox. Can fully commit to FF now.

[-] yildolw@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

The TreeStyleTab extension for Firefox has added vertical tabs for a decade

[-] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago

The way tree style tabs worked after they broke it was never very good. Floorp is what to use if you wanted side tabs on Firefox.

That said I still went back to Vivaldi after trying to use Floorp because of stupid little ux issues like pinned tabs not being protected from closing, and broken session saving.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 91 points 5 months ago

This is what Mozilla should have done a LONG time ago - focussed on browser features, ease of use, compatibility and speed. Make a better browser if you want to win a browser war.

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Maybe they should, but focusing on adding new features endlessly is how we ended up with this state of internet browsers. The most complex app running on a desktop are too big, it's basically impossible to create a new one. (Yes you can fork but that's just adding toppings to ice cream). The browser war ends only one way.

If we break up the do-everything application into significant parts then a healthy "war" can exist. Why does a browser need to play video, you already have an app for that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 50 points 5 months ago

One of these things is not like the other

[-] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I do not know why browser makers like Opera or Brave(and now apparently Firefox) is going hey ho over AI. I don't see a proper benefit of integration of local AI for most people as of now.

As for vertical tabs, Waterfox got it just now. It is basically a fork of Tree Style Tabs and very basically implemented. I am honestly happy with TST on Firefox and while a native integration might be a bit faster(my browser takes just that few extra seconds to load the right TST panel on my slow laptop), it'll likely be feature incomplete when compared to TST.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

It depends. I really liked Mozillas initiative for local translation - much better for data privacy than remote services. But conversational/generative AI, no thank you.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

AI-generated alt-text for images inserted into PDFs

Sounds more like classification so far. Things like summarising web-pages would be properly generative, LLMs in general could be useful to interrogate your browsing history. Doing feature extraction on it, sorting it into a graph of categories not by links, but concepts could be useful. And heck if a conversational interface falls out of that I'm not exactly opposed, unlike the stuff you see on the net it's bound to quote its sources, it's going to tell you right-away that "a cat licking you is trying to see whether you're fit for consumption" doesn't come from the gazillion of cat behaviour sites you've visited, but reddit. Firefox doesn't have an incentive to keep you in the AI interface and out of some random webpage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I want fewer built-in features, not more of them. All of these things should be extensions, not built into the browser core.

I mean, I'd be perfectly happy for said extensions and more to be shipped by default -- it would be good for Firefox to come "batteries included" even with adblocking and such, and that's most likely the way I would use it. But I just want it to be modular and removable as a matter of principle.

I remember how monolithic Mozilla SeaMonkey got too top-heavy and forced Mozilla to start over more-or-less from scratch with ~~Phoenix~~ ~~Firebird~~ Firefox, and I want it to stick close to those roots so they don't have to do it again.

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They are probably extensions, just like pip, pocket, screenshot upload, languages, search engines, themes, etc.

Shipped by default, handled like extensions internally but not exposed to the user. You see it in the extension*.json files in your profile folder.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

In that case, I want them exposed just like user-installed extensions, so it's more obvious how to get rid of them if you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Facni@kbin.social 18 points 5 months ago

We need modular browsers. It is hard for Mozilla to keep the track to the W3C and all the nonstandard stuff that Google, Microsoft and Apple add to their browsers. If those elements were modules, it would be easier for people to collaborate and for Google and Microsoft to be obligated to add support for other browsers.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Larry@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

Local AI sounds nice. One reason I'm cynical about the current state of AI is because of how many send all your data to another company

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] micka190@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Profile management

Fucking finally!

The fact that you had to use external applications or manually go to an internal Firefox menu to change from one to another sucked!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Thrife@feddit.de 28 points 5 months ago

Tab grouping, nice! Finally back after they removed then years ago..

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 months ago

"AI", more like A-eyeroll 🙄

[-] ours@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

There's AI and there's AI. I really like that Firefox has local models for translating content. Them adding AI that describes images for visually impaired people is pretty cool.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 months ago

Yeah people forget that AI isn't just the garbage generators of late. It's all machine learning based software. There are lots of perfectly valid applications of AI that have been used for decades. The term has just become tainted recently by LLMs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago

Local AI, or also, how AI should be. Actually helpful, instead of a spying and data gathering tool for companies

[-] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

That's all fine and good but Firefox on Android is currently in a sorry state. No per-site process isolation, buggy, can't keep tabs open, slow, choppy, drains battery. Had to uninstall it on my brand new Galaxy S24+ and my Pixel 6 Pro because it was draining so much battery. When are you going to finally stop ignoring Firefox Android, Mozilla?

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 30 points 5 months ago

I've been using it for at least a decade now and haven't encountered any of the issues you mention.

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 17 points 5 months ago

I've used it exclusively for a long time and haven't experienced any of this

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 14 points 5 months ago

slow, choppy, drains battery

Sounds like you don't have an adblocker.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Building back to that 2005 standard feature set.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
705 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59094 readers
3289 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS