this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

Labour

7759 readers
10 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

  1. Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.

  2. No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.

  3. Don’t dox yourself or others.

  4. Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The mistake is operating within the nlrb framework. The UAW didn't win in the 30s by asking the government to recognize them and if the 2000 or so people that voted for a union in that plant acted like they were a union rather than waiting for the bourgeoisie to pat them on the head and give their approval Mercedes would be at the bargaining table with them right now.

[–] WashedAnus@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

Even within the IWW all anyone talks about is the NLRB and its framework. The NLRB doesn't work for us, it works for "the American people," which includes the bosses and, realistically, is just the bosses. Even when a fellow worker in my branch got screwed over by the NLRB, everyone keeps talking within the framework of the NLRB.