this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)

Hardware

5618 readers
1 users here now

This is a community dedicated to the hardware aspect of technology, from PC parts, to gadgets, to servers, to industrial control equipment, to semiconductors.

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As a person who doesn't know or understand this stuff at all, just by reading the list of companies and the fact that some of them will pursue this on their own anyway, it seems like this is going to lead nowhere

[–] taanegl@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Microsoft Azure is a pretty big cloud provider, and Qualcomm as well as AMD target the data centre all the time. Add the fact that they need reliable code with reliable hardware and the ability to put up new infrastructure quickly.

It wouldn't be the first time various hardware vendors get together to form a shared standard. In fact, I'd say the times it does happen it's more often good than bad, and NVIDIA enjoying yet another advantage is something I see as a bad thing.

But seeing as Google is involved the whole thing will be hyped, neglected, nerfed and then scrapped for a new standard within the next 5 years.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Until nvidia is onboard, it’s kinda meaningless.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Google and Microsoft are important here. They both manufacture AI chips and sell compute via Cloud and Azure. I'm surprised Amazon is not onboard but this might be enough.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Should we do something about one company being the only company that matters?