127
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 147 points 5 months ago

That... is not how programming bugs work...

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 71 points 5 months ago

They meant the feature flag should've stayed false until the player base was hooked on the game enough to make the pushback minimal.

[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 7 points 5 months ago

Ah yes, stealth whale hunting.

[-] tourist@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Intern slipped, fell and landed on the "monetize extra lives" button

[-] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 110 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Thats a very elaborate, specific bug that just so coincidentally happens to be monetarily beneficial to the developer/publisher.

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 40 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I mean, it happens to all of us. Just the other day I was working on letting users change the font in an app and I accidentally made it so they needed to enter a valid credit card number to log in, complete with detailed instructions, and then accidentally charged them $20.

Not sure how any of that happened. I'll definitely get around to disabling it soon though, I promise.

[-] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Ah, so true. How could I have overlooked this?

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Once I was programming a fintech solution for a big client. Someone way back when made an error in how numbers (money, cents) are to be rounded up or down. When you had to create a new feature that handled money, you had to reproduce that bug (since users got used to the math being wrong)

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 61 points 5 months ago

"We're sorry we got caught."

[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 16 points 5 months ago

Also internally : "The result of our cleverly disguised market study came in, there is still too much backlash against it right now. Try again in 6 months."

[-] maxenmajs@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nah, they don't get the benefit of doubt between this and the impossible free battlepass grind. The whole game reeks of shitty F2P monetization.

[-] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 months ago

The game is a mess. I watch my kid play it and it’s so less graceful than smash. Framerates randomly drop, lag spikes happen a few times a minute, hit boxes seem nebulous compared to attack animations.

You can use maybe a quarter of the roster for free. You may be able to unlock everybody from in game currency, but I’m not too sure. They also just… removed a character that wasn’t free. If I paid any money for premium content I’d be pissed

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

They removed The iron Giant while some kind of tournament was going on. There was a story about some dude who was rising the ranks of the tournament and then they just removed his fucking main

[-] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

A+ game development right there. I don’t like how Nintendo runs their online services (and actively opposes game tournaments), but you wouldn’t expect such a change in Smash.

[-] shani66@ani.social 1 points 5 months ago

Why oppose tournaments?

[-] Koen967@feddit.nl 4 points 5 months ago

Should've been interesting patch notes. "We've noticed the Iron Giant has been overperforming, so we just straight up deleted him so we won't have to think about it."

[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago

I would be wary of letting a child play anything with monetization tactics like this.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

So, so sick of these pathetic companies monetizing everything to the max to the detriment of everything else, then saying "Oopsie mistake! That was not intended" when the backlash is too great. If they said "our publisher was not content with making a great profit, we wanted to ruin your experience to maximize shareholder returns, but you folks all complained too much and it's now affecting our reputation", I would at least respect the honesty...

[-] pkmkdz@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"What you don't want to pay $1 each time you reload a gun in game??" - John Riccitiello

[-] overload@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

Pff, look at all these silly, price sensitive, players.

[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

"Fuck you" seams to be about the right reply to MultiVersus studio.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Ban all forms of taking money inside video games.

[-] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Bug aside - the game plays slower than Ganondorf in Super Smash Bros. Braw…

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
127 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16645 readers
693 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS