this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
997 points (92.1% liked)

Memes

45659 readers
1634 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 188 points 5 months ago (6 children)

If you had 34 trillion in debt and a centuries-long history of making on-time payments, you’d have a perfect credit score.

"Bankers hate him! Get an 850 credit score and dictate the terms and interest rate of your own debt using this one simple trick."

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 20 points 5 months ago

The US govt basically has a perfect credit score. They have almost infinite payment history and almost infinite available credit.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget being the only issuer of the currency you get indebted in. If I could get indebted in a currency I create myself, believe me I would

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Articles and posts like this really just exist for conservatives to shout that we need to stop federal spending and cut out "unimportant" things like Dept of Education, as described in Project 2025.

The problem is that debt is good. It enables us to pay for infrastructure projects and services. It doesn't work like a household budget...not on the scale of international economies...because money "in the bank" is money that's not in circulation.

When money is not in circulation, it's not being used to pay for goods and services....it's just...sitting there being hoarded.

You all complain about Musk hoarding a few hundred billions. Imagine if the debt were in the opposite direction and the government had $34T sitting in the bank doing nothing.

And anyone can buy Treasury debt. In fact, last year it was an AMAZING return on investment for anyone that bought into it and holds into the debt for a few years. One of the safest places anybody could put money to earn a return (behind a HYSA at FDIC insured banks).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Credit rating also depends on credit to debt ratio. You want to keep it below 35%, so you would need a credit line of $100T or more to have a great rating.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think sovereign debt would work like an AmEx Platimum with “no fixed limit”, which makes the algorithm ignore utilization.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Yeah, this is just people not understanding how credit scores work, part #57294, lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 107 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Are you immortal? Do you have an income vastly higher than the servicing cost of that debt? Do you owe the large a majority of that debt to yourself? Are you able to, if push came to shove, tell your external creditors to go fuck themselves and dare them to so much as try to collect on the debt you don't feel like paying? If you can't answer "yes" to all these questions, you aren't the US and have a debt situation that has absolutely nothing in common with the US debt.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do not forget that you are also the very entity that hands out the currency you hold your debt in.

[–] Starbuck@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It’s like Dwight printing IOUs for Schrutebucks

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Two things:

  • if you owe the bank $34,000, it’s your problem; if you owe the bank $34,000,000,000,000, it’s the bank’s problem.
  • its a big club, and you’re not in it.
[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's a lot of zeros, when written like that

Yes, and it is the correct number of zeros to use. I find it helps to put things into scope. “Trillion” is an abstract magnitude to most people. Writing it out numerically makes it clear how absolutely enormous the number is.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Worth pointing out that credit scores are completely detached from the government. They are entirely private industry, that is collecting and selling your financial info without your consent or opt in. If you were born before 2004, then they have also accidentally leaked literally all your personal info to the dark web, with literally 0 consequences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 5 months ago (13 children)

-1000 social credit for questioning government

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Micro-economics vs. macro-economics

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I strongly encourage people who still think like OP to look up what happened the last time we paid off the national debt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The US has a fantastic credit score. Being the world's reserve currency helps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Well, since the billionaire class doesn't pay it's fair share of the tax burden, that money has to come from somewhere.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 5 months ago (4 children)

On a serious note. Are there any countries without any national debt? Because if not then clearly capitalism is broken right?

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 38 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

No, if anything it shows capitalism is working. When you can increase or tighten money supply (ie when you can print and shred money) debt isn’t what you think it is. A state with money issuance powers is not a household.

I can thoroughly recommend “The Deficit Myth” book by Stephanie Kelton, if you wish to understand modern monetary policy better.

Or watch the film Finding the Money: https://youtu.be/3HRgsYSLOYw?si=g_CgqMWtC7oBCkGn

And to answer your specific question, there are countries with very low debt, but that’s usually due to either not being able to “borrow” money (again, borrowing doesn’t always mean what we would think as borrowing when you can issue your own money), being locked to another currency (Denmark is a great example - amazing economy and locked to the euro) or having a large generation of wealth (typically oil). Larger countries can issue debt more easily.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Takios@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 5 months ago (10 children)

I'm not the biggest fan of capitalism myself but the existence of debt does not mean it is broken. Debt is a mechanism to allow for solid investments, e.g. building infrastructure or schools that will create a net positive in the (far) future.
Germany for example has enacted a Schuldenbremse (debt-break) in 2009 and forbids our states to take on new debt and limits the debt taken on the federal level to a minisule percentage of the GDP. Our infrastructure is currently slowly but noticeably crumbling away, bridges are getting closed for heavy traffic and experts say many of them have become irreparable due to missing maintenance and need to be fully rebuild in a few years. The local military barracks are in such a desolate condition that the soldiers need to drive two towns over to shower. We might not take on financial debt, but an infrastructure debt that will demand an even bigger toll on us.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] quoll@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 5 months ago (6 children)

have you considered printing your own money?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Credit scores are just some fake shit that boomers made up. It's so dumb.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 39 points 5 months ago (6 children)

...except that it used to be that your ability to secure a loan was based on where you went to school, how firm your handshake was, and if you happened to have the right skin color and sex organs.

The current system certainly isn't perfect; and if you're denied a loan you have a legal right (in the US) to know the reason.

There are systemic issues, to be sure. But the nominal goal is absolutely better than what we used to have.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

We can’t ignore that there are other ways of doing it besides credit scores or overt racism. Some countries have no credit scores at all and just base loan eligibility on your salary and employment history.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (17 children)

Countries can print money. If the debt is denominated in your own currency you will never not be able to pay them.

[–] karashta@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago (8 children)

This.

More people need to understand that the debt of a sovereign nation isn't analogous to that of a household.

Public sector debt is private sector surplus.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Tell me you don’t understand how credit score works without telling me you don’t understand how credit score works

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Credit scores require you to get some kind of debt. This is because it's not a score of your financial health. It's a score of how reliably you repay your debt.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Terry Pratchett's "Making Money" taught me enough economics to know that individual debt and national debt are two different things.

[–] Vej@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

I wonder how many debt collector calls the Whitehouse gets a day

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How much does the USA have in assets? I'm willing to bet more than $34,000,000,000,000.00.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

if it makes you feel any better you'd go to prison if you decided to run a ponzi scheme... unless you're a bank, that is

[–] Varven@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wait a bank is a Ponzi scheme

[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Not literally. I bet the poster notices the overlap between ponzi and fractional reserve lending and doesn't care about the differences

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Whats really neat is that modern credit score systems are only 40-50 years old

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

And what's sad are the number of people that act like credit scores are a force of nature we just have to accept

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I heard that the us still has good credit because although it owes trillions, it is worth quadrillions (all lands and assets), so not really a concern

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 months ago

putting people in debt is how people with already too much money make even more money from people who never had enough

load more comments
view more: next ›