this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
97 points (76.2% liked)

Linux

48713 readers
1108 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
97
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Moorshou@lemmy.zip to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

I was curious what the Linux people think about Microsoft and any bad practices that most people should know about already?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 130 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Embrace, extend, extinguish

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 6 months ago

Came here to say this. They wrote the playbook that has spelled the end or at least shitification of so many standards, open-source or otherwise(but usually still free-to-use or at least cheap).

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 37 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They also wrote the book on user-hostile everything

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

And set the bar super low for other tech companies

[–] electricprism@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

IIRC It's on their Wikipedia

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Microsoft is definitely the corpoest of them all.

Probably not the worst corpo, likely even, but out of the corpos, they are the most corpo corpo of any corpo.

  1. They own LinkedIn, and I could just stop this list here.
  2. They're the founding fathers of Embrace, Extend and Extinguish.
  3. They are the vanguard of videogame studio consolidation, after buying Activision and Bethesda.
  4. AI
  5. Everything they do is soggy bread: you can eat it, it's probably mostly healthy, I think, but if a product is not the minimum viable product then it will be; take the Halo franchise as a reference for blandness, Windows for end user tolerance - both are controversial yet functional and popular software that people complain (and do nothing) about. Halo took quite a hit in popularity, but still...
  6. Remember when a software company got in trouble for monopolistic practices? That was a thing that happened at some point, and it was Microsoft. Not that it will ever happen again, nowadays all the cool kids have some slice of the tech landscape on a chokehold.
[–] emberpunk@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

Ok but look on the bright side of things! you get great futures with this big tech concentration and control of the market. For instance, who else doesn't want a operating system hotkey to Linkedin, baked into their settings? How did I use a computer without that before?!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 60 points 6 months ago (11 children)

They tried to destroy linux and free/libre software, and when that didn't work, they started cornering the market and pushing for a move from "Free" to "Open Source." They also support SaaS model, and have made it next to impossible to get a new computer without their mediocre OS. On top of that, their OS is full of spyware, and is starting to become adware too.

But that all pales in comparison to the fact that you do not own your own OS: you can run Microsoft's OS, but you can't modify it or share it.

Oh, and this falls more in the realm of personal preference, but the deliberate lack of customizability is a real pain in the ass.

4/10 OS, only slightly better at disguising its capitalist greed than Apple.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 53 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Do you like having bullshit forced on you? Paying a $150 license to have ads in your operating system? Don't care at all about privacy? Then Windows is for you!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

pretty much.

If you need a point for developers: all public code repositories hosted on GitHub are harvested, at least in 2021, and used to train copilot regardless of their license. Furthermore, GitHub is OWNED by Microsoft now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 41 points 6 months ago

my favorite bit was how no one at microsoft actually understood their own licensing pricing. for decades, you could call microsoft for pricing and get different answer from people in cubicles next to each other or even from your own rep.

it was as if they were making it up as needed.

[–] thirteene@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Microsoft has been building the O365 platform to lock out competitors and locking users into an ecosystem that is difficult to leave. They systematically eliminate competition and have pushed to create laws that make competition harder. In embrace extend extinguish, they are in phase 3, which is a massive red flag. They also started putting out spyware and malware into their software and have proven they can't maintain security; making them a bad actor in a position of power. Scale is debatable, but Microsoft is undeniably evil in 2024.

[–] GrappleHat@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 months ago

A coworker recently sent me a Word document with edits and comments they had added. When I downloaded & opened it (in Word on Windows!) it told me that it had the edits/comments but it wouldn't let me see them unless I log in to my Microsoft account and then view it online in the web version of Word. What the actual fuck?

Fuck that. I responded to my coworker and asked them to just send me the edits via email in plain text. I'm not winning popularity contests at work, but what the fuck Microsoft?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fargeol@lemmy.ml 37 points 6 months ago

How bad is Microsoft?

Yes

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 6 months ago (13 children)

Windows is the worst thing that ever happened to computer science.

And I don't exaclly mean the product itself, but the mindset and habits that came with it.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The worst thing is, that Windows (and DOS) is the only main operating system that is not POSIX compatible, or Unix like. Besides not being open source...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] fcSolar@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Microsoft abuses their de facto monopoly to engage in gross invasion of their users' privacy, and continues to try to wrest their users' control of their system from them by altering system settings after updates, and making some settings nearly impossible to change. And that's to say nothing of MS's attempts to turn their operating system into and advertising platform.

[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 months ago

How bad is Microsoft?

Bad enough to be stay away from

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why did you link to the Microsoft website?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sansrealname@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 months ago

Maybe I'm going crazy but I feel like I've been seeing this post or an identical one for many days, maybe even a week, yet the age is still one day.

Still, fuck MS and all.

[–] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 21 points 6 months ago

Microsoft is about as bad as any other proprietary software company. They do some good things for the open source economy, but they also mistreat their users.

I think it's a mistake to look at the free software movement as being a reaction against Microsoft or Google. It's against the proprietary software world in general.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 21 points 6 months ago

They coined the term Embrace, Extend, Extinguish and they haven't stopped enforcing it. I haz not much faith on WSL and similar.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 months ago (4 children)

First they tried to destroy FOSS, then they realized that they can make money and gain control using open source software, so now they pretend to support it. Microsoft is a monopolistic piece of garbage that I'm staying away from at all costs.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think they're pretending. Open source software is a valuable resource for basically all major tech companies, and a lot of it is driven by major tech companies. Some kind of combination of open source and proprietary software will always be a thing for them. This isn't some major contradiction, they use either model based on the specific needs of the project.

This is why some think "Open Source" is too permissive since they see it as free/cheap labor to be exploited by huge corporations.

I'm not sure that I see it that way, but I can see their point.

[–] optissima@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If as soon as it's more profitable for it to not be they stop supporting it, then yes they were pretending.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 16 points 6 months ago

Working there is apparently pretty nice. Microsoft on the inside is not Microsoft on the outside.

But regardless, terrible company with terrible products. Even if they didn't do anything shady, they still aren't great.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As a shareholder (which I'm not), it's absolutely amazing.

As a human being though... it's simple to look at the history of the company, from its inception based on nepotism and locking-down was hitherto the common good, to going from one place of monopoly (OS, app, cloud) to another (extending to whatever is trendy at the moment e.g XR with HoloLens, AI with OpenAI, etc).

It's IMHO one of the very worst thing that could have happened to humanity in terms of cognitive empowerment. Apple is not far behind but in terms of locking up an entire ecosystem but Microsoft, sadly, is doing it better.

To clarify what I mean is that Microsoft is the business embodiment of learned helplessness. Most people would shrug at the quality of software they provide, the price, etc ONLY because they are convinced, wrongfully so, that they are is no legitimate alternative. If users were actually able to chose, not being coerced into but properly chose, by experiencing alternatives, the World would be totally different. Instead of having computer users who feel an adversarial relationship to their devices, we would have a much stronger relation of "this is MY device" the same way a lot (not all) of people have a repair toolbox at home. They know they can try to fix something in THEIR home, even improve it. Most people understand it won't be easy, they might mess it up, but it's possible to try. Not in software, and that's entirely Microsoft "success". Maybe in an alternative reality others, like Apple, would have made that happen to, but in our reality I blame Microsoft, Bill Gates upbringing from his legal mindset father and well connected mother.

We could have a world were users own their devices, have a challenging yet empowering relationship to technology, starting with software, and instead we have exploitative learning helplnessness. So yes, Microsoft is that bad.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 16 points 6 months ago

Yes. During the entire history of MSDOS, Windows and Internet Explorer, there are so many things you can pick why Microsoft is bad. Now they even integrate Recall into Windows. I want to say that I always disconnected Xbox from Microsoft; and I'm not entirely sure why.

The question of this post is a bit misleading, because it implies that someone could answer with "no". Better question (in my opinion) is "How bad is Microsoft?".

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think overall they are not better or worse than other tech giants. They try to be the platform for blank and thus to push competitors out of the marked, or lock it down so they can't enter. They try to extract as much money from their customers as they can, even if it makes the user experience worse. They push the boundaries of what the can legally do. They charge you, but you don't own anything.

What really grinds my gears is how they try to force stuff on me that I don't fucking want. I feel like they are completely different in that regard than for example Google. I use Google Maps because I want to. I don't use Chrome because I don't want to. It's that easy. They don't ask me to reconsider, they don't make it super complicated to switch, nothing. I can disable any Google App and forget about it.

To stick with the Google comparison, I also feel like Google informs me better and gives me more control regarding my data. This feels much more hidden on convoluted in MS products in general. For example I had no idea Office is basically spyware before reading about it elsewhere. In Google-land, they seem much more upfront about what they use and what I can opt out from (or in to).

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't think about Microsoft at all mostly. I supported their stuff professionally in the past and friends/family but otherwise total avoidance. They own some big game studios so I probably use some of their products like Minecraft but I haven't used their operating systems or applications for decades and I dislike and distrust cloud services and theirs is no exception. All big companies tend to be the same. Try not to depend on any of them.

[–] Grangle1@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

IMO the title of "worst computer tech company" is essentially a tie between MS and Google right now, with the two constantly one-upping the other back and forth on stupid ideas and corporate practices.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No offence, but have you been living under a Microsoft shaped rock for the past 30 years?

[–] Moorshou@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

My lifespan is shorter than 30 years so yes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cairden@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Is this the circlejerk community of lemmy?

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago

Average Reddit comment.

  • Attempts to roast everyone in the thread and dreail the thread itself by attempting to be "funny".
  • Contributes nothing to the discussion.
  • Is the reason why circle jerk threads begin at all.

You: 🤡

[–] zeroAhead@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What is the point of your comment? The person asked what the Linux community thinks about Microsoft and you come with this idiotic CiRcLeJerk bs? You didn't add anything to the thread.

I've learnt a bunch of horrible practices done by MS that I wasn't aware of so thank you everybody else.

[–] Cairden@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

If you have been on lemmy for any amount of time, "Microsoft bad" is posted almost daily. I'm not disagreeing, yes they are bad. It's super circle jerky to post a whole thread literally asking something that is posted in comments/other posts literally daily. It's fine I just find it funny lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mudle@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

Undoubtedly

[–] kbal@fedia.io 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It used to be pretty bad, back when it was using all the dirty tricks it could invent to build its monopoly. By now though it's just obsolete.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 12 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Obsolete? Hardly. The Surface, GamePass, Xbox, GitHub, Skype and just general market dominance says otherwise. They only lost their effective monopoly due to antitrust lawsuits.

Currently, there's lots of better options out there, true, but it's far from obsolete.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This thread teaches me that generally, most Linux people are looking at windows. Meanwhile Microsoft only thinks Windows is 16% of its business.

Basically, it seems, most Linux users do not think hard about Microsoft.

[–] redbr64@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

IIRC, Azure represents the largest slice of Microsoft's revenue... And ironically, a fair chunk of that is run on Linux

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] urska@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago

Buggy and laggy. I work with it and its a daily pain for my soul and mental health.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Microsoft has basically taken almost all businesses in the world hostage.
Once your staff is trained on MS products and your own stuff is fully connected to Azure, you're trapped and they can adjust prices to just below what you can bear.

Microsoft doesn't need a monopoly in the dying consumer desktop market anymore. That's why they're the top contributor to the Linux kernel, integrated a Linux layer into their OS, offer to save documents in an open format in Office, and host articles on how to install Linux in their documentation.

The year of the Linux desktop has finally come. Everyone who doesn't still run Windows 7, now has a Unix system installed on their PCs (and all other devices). It's just one that's distributed by Google, Microsoft or Apple.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›