383
submitted 3 months ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/13249285

A book about book bans has been banned in a Florida school district.

Ban This Book, a children’s book written by Alan Gratz, will no longer be available in the Indian River county school district since the school board voted to remove the book last month.

Gratz’s book, which came out in 2017, follows fourth-grader Amy Anne Ollinger as she tries to check out her favorite book. Ollinger is told by the librarian she cannot, because it was banned after a classmate’s parent thought it was inappropriate. She then creates a secret banned-books library, entering into “an unexpected battle over book banning, censorship, and who has the right to decide what she and her fellow students can read”, according to the book’s description on Gratz’s website.

In a peculiar case of life imitating art, Jennifer Pippin, a parent in the coastal community, challenged the book.

Pippin’s opposition is what prompted the school board to vote 3-2 in favor of removing it from shelves. The vote happened despite the district’s book-review committee vetting the work and deciding to keep it in schools.

Indian River county school board members disagreed with how Gratz’s book referred to other works that had been taken out of school, and accused it of “teaching rebellion of school-board authority”, according to the Tallahassee Democrat.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 74 points 3 months ago

Yo dawg, I heard you like book bans

[-] Kaput@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Funny thing is you would not expect that from mom's for liberty... It like Mom against drunk driving holding a wine tasting drive thru.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

"Liberty" has long been code in the US for "far right ideals". Same with "patriot".

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago
[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago

Time to write a sequel Alan.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 33 points 3 months ago

Ban This Book Too

[-] Steve@communick.news 15 points 3 months ago

Or re-release the same book with a different title.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 19 points 3 months ago

Don't Ban This Book.

They seem to be taking things literally, so let them get their head around this.

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Maybe "Ban this book if you are gay".

You know, since these pearl clutchers have the intelligence of middle schoolers maybe applying the same deterrence logic.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

Aren’t a bunch of them deeply closeted though? They’ll say they aren’t but in their hearts, they’ll have to ban it.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 points 3 months ago

“Stupid says ‘ban’?”

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago

Fascistsayswhat?

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago

Critical thinking is terrifying!

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago

lol republicans don’t like their dirty laundry being aired out. Just like China arresting protestors for holding a blank sign.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

China arresting protestors for holding a blank sign

Incidentally, that was a protest against COVID lock down measures, which Der Spiegel picked up and turned into a "China won't even let people wave white paper!" headline. It got picked up by anti-COVID activists in western states and used as proof that lock downs were a form of big government fascism.

[-] pezmaker@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago

Book bans all the way down

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Pippin’s opposition is what prompted the school board to vote 3-2 in favor of removing it from shelves.

School board NIMBYs do be like that.

“teaching rebellion of school-board authority”

Surprised they didn't call the author a tankie.

[-] thecodeboss@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Should be more like, "teaching to question authority instead of blindly accepting it"

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I mean, that gets complicated.

I've been in classrooms where - say - staunch evangelicals are constantly questioning the authority of a biology teacher as she's working through the lesson plan. But this tolerance for "questioning authority" only ever seems to swing one way. You won't see equivalent degrees of tolerance extended to, say, arguing with a gym teacher in an "abstinence only" health class who insists that condoms have a 50% failure rate or a history teacher who keeps rebranding the Civil War as The War of Northern Aggression.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago

Yesterday I was listening to a podcast which was interrupted by an ad about Ad Block plus.So many things about that situation was just so bizarre, that I listened out of curiosity. I guess some people also listen to that ad, pay a monthly subscription to an ad blocker, so that they don’t need to see ads in their browser any more. The irony is strong with this one…

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
383 points (99.2% liked)

Not The Onion

11846 readers
460 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS