154
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DavidGA@lemmy.world 89 points 4 months ago

Remember that it's not the popular vote that counts, it's the electoral college, and current polling gives Trump a 2-in-3 chance of winning the college:

https://www.economist.com/interactive/us-2024-election/prediction-model/president

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 55 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Me reading this link getting 2016 flashbacks

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Dude I’ve been getting those vibes since it became apparent Trump couldn’t be kept from becoming the GOP nominee

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I'd say Biden is in an even worse position, his push to the far right on immigration, economics, genocide etc. because he thinks he has voters over a barrel has alienated and demoralized a lot of voters. He's quite literally to the right of Ronald Reagan at this point on so many issues, it's a tall order to ask non-conservatives to vote for him when he's literally just a Republican.

His inability to change course very well might cost him the election, and even if he does squeak out a win it guaruntees that the Democratic party will continue to see moving right and supporting genocide as the way to win elections.

US democracy is kind of a walking corpse at this point I think. People just don't want to acknowledge what the problems are and think kicking the can down the road some more will help.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

This is why things are shit and nothing changes. You can't just show up to vote for the president and then fuck off for four years. You have to vote in every local election too. Its not a walking corpse, the flies just know when nothing is around the shit.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

You’re right that we need to vote in all elections to enable more progressive politics. The problem is even when we try to do that, establishment democrats come in with millions of dollars in PAC money to back the establishment candidate instead and keep the political outsiders out. Jessica Cisneros would have been amazing, but Pelosi did everything she could to keep the corrupt goon Cuellar in place, who is now indicted on 14 federal corruption charges. Of course Pelosi still backs him, full-throatedly.

It’s not going to get better until we stop the corruption and end the legalized bribes by getting money out of politics. Until then it’s just a dog and pony show to keep us distracted enough to not be in open rebellion in the streets over how badly the working class is getting robbed. And the elites are in a panic because they are losing that grip…it’s going to be a wild election season in America to say the least.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Dems do have an amazing ability to learn the exact wrong lessons from situations such as this. It’s also mildly infuriating that most attempts to point out these shortcomings are met with shaming or outrageous claims of nefarious intent instead of a modicum of introspection. Those are the interactions that make it hard to hold on to hope for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] criitz@reddthat.com 25 points 4 months ago
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

538 has been unreliable for several election cycles, though..

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I think people need to stop thinking that "most likely outcome" = prediction. They gave Trump a 1/4 chance of winning in 2016, which is far from impossible and better than most were saying. Their latest trackers have really emphasized the probability aspect of things, rather than the expected vote share.

They actually did a project about this. Here's how close they were with US House predictions: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/checking-our-work/us-house-elections/ (you can look up other elections but since there are so many to work with here I thought it was a good place to start)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I mean, they were only actually reliable in 2008, and that's looking more and more like a fluke.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 months ago

Are they more accurate than other analyses, though? What is the magnitude of the error?

30% error would be “unreliable” to me.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago

Polls are for pundits.

Vote in November.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Swings in polls are notable, and there's reason to believe Trump's conviction hurt his approval among independents.

Will this last? Idk. Hillary was up by 10-pts in October and crashed to a dead-heat on election day. But it should be worth considering what current events have a positive or negative impact on a candidate's approval.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

We can thank the "trumpland" FBI for that swing. I know it's a fan-fave to blame Hillary for that swing, but it's not like she told the FBI to open an "investigation" into Buttery Males, and not mention that donnie was under investigation when making that big splashy announcement about Hillary...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 28 points 4 months ago

The polls are absolute shit. You can draw a little bit of a conclusion that if Biden went up by 2 points, that probably means that wherever the real answer is, it might not be crazy to think it went up by somewhere from 1 to 3 points because of something that happened. That part may be worth being slightly happy about. But whether that real answer is +2 like they say, or -10, or +20, modern polls actually can't tell you, and all these people that are telling you they can, are lying. In my opinion.

Source: I looked through the methodology they actually use for this polling and found it to be dogshit, and then looked up a few polls for recent elections and found that the poll differed from the actual result of the election by an average of 16 percentage points.

[-] dragontamer@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Polls are dogshit.

But poll movements are worth tracking as long as the dogshit quality remains consistent.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

True but what the poster said is important: polls do not work well in close races because they don't sample correctly. The average poll respondent is older, whiter, and more conservative than the average voter. So you end up with a skewed sample. Plus you sample so few of the other voters that you can't make a guess as to what they think.

No younger people answer the phone for pollsters, so this is hard to fix. They are probably going to have to start paying people to answer surveys. I know I won't answer them for 15 or 20 minutes for free.

[-] dragontamer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

True but what the poster said is important: polls do not work well in close races because they don’t sample correctly.

That's not my point. My point is that the poll movements are almost always correct, because pollsters are at least consistent with how biased they are / errors in sampling.

Fox News had Trump leading Biden a few weeks ago. Today, Biden is ahead of Trump. We don't know where the "truth" lies, but we can 100% conclude that the typical American has lost a bit of favor on Trump in the past few weeks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

Don’t care, voting Brandon. Fuck the republican traitor filth.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 22 points 4 months ago

Remember everyone- vote as if there are no polls!

[-] chetradley@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

For those who forgot polls don't mean shit and only voting matters:

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 months ago

Can we talk about how the graphic didn't sort the results in any kind of chronological order? Today, then October 2023, then May 2024 is an insane way to present this data. Go either oldest first or newest first sort order.

[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 4 months ago

That sort of thing is pretty common for Fox.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

"leading former President Donald Trump 50% to 48%, nationally."

We do not have national elections.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

True, they've become an international affair, contrary to the rules.

(Yes I know you meant that it's a bunch of state elections in a trench coat)

That's a pretty funny idea for a political cartoon - swing states in a trench coat trying to get into the democracy theater.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago

Fox News NEVER lies and also this poll is RIGGED and FAKE!

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

The Biden campaign has been running polls and focus groups for weeks, and the message has been clear: a felony conviction is a turn-off and a dealbreaker for some meaningful number of voters

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah, but enough of a turn-off that they will actively vote for Biden when the time comes, and not just sit it out or cast a third party protest vote?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

To me these polls were NOT important because of the swing to Biden. They were important due to the swing in important issues. To 68% of those surveyed the most important issue was "the Preservation of Democracy". This tells me that people are taking the totally insane Trump ranting seriously and all Biden really has to do is let Trump be Trump. Trump can't win losing independents.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

In the moment, sure. We'll see how much people care about his conviction when its four months in the rear view mirror and "Hunter Biden Newest Dick Picks" bombard the latest media cycle.

But maybe - just maybe - the Dems will see prosecuting high ranking conservative crooks as a boon rather than a hazard as they run into the next election cycle. Maybe someone will have the bright idea to bring federal charges against Ken Paxton or Ron DeSantis or even Elon Musk.

Or maybe not. Maybe we'll just scratch Trump off as "Uniquely Prosecutable" and never do this again.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Polls don't predict the future. They are a photo of the time they were taken.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Trump will be furious to find out.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
154 points (90.1% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4473 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS