this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
62 points (97.0% liked)

Games

16949 readers
633 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
62
Palworld boss says a Switch version ‘might be hard for technical reasons’ (www.videogameschronicle.com)
submitted 6 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It definitely is not an optimized game. It doesn't run really well on my ROG Ally, so I can't imagine trying to do it on a Switch.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

To be fair to the ROG, it doesn't run really well on anything

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

The technical reasons including but not limited to "Nintendo told us to go fuck ourselves."

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 months ago

Because it has the graphical horsepower of an iPhone 4s

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

It does seem like it would be an amount of work.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Would Nintendo even allow it?

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why not, they are one store front with prolific shovelware still.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think Shadow is referring to Palworld's similarities to Pokemon. There had been a lot of tension over whether or not Nintendo would try to sue the Palworld dev, so it stands to reason that selling something so contentious on Nintendo's own platform might be a bit awkward.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It was only contentious among fans. Nintendo literally said they didn't give a single shit about Palworld.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What tension? Fans being stupid?

Nintendo is litigious yea, but there’s hundreds of emulators out there that haven’t been sued, they only sue people who do blatantly illegal stuff they can sue them for. What has palworld done that’s illegal?

Emulators are legal, so they leave the legal ones, they go after the ones perpetuating the illegal parks, like Yuzu.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why is this even a question? Nintendo shouldn't have any say whatsoever on what people get to play on their own fucking hardware.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

But they do because they control their developer ecosystem.

I agree that consoles should allow competing stores, but that's not the current reality.