25
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 29 points 4 months ago

I don't unless a website requires that I talk to one as a poor excuse for customer service.

So, less than once a year.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I just type "Speak to a human" until it relents. Usually takes 3-4 times. Kind of the chatbot equivalent of mashing 0 on telephone IVRs. The only question of its that I answer, after it agrees to get a human, is when it asks what I need support with since that gets forwarded to the tech.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 22 points 4 months ago

About as often as I have a conversation with my dishwasher: never.

[-] dingus@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Jeez...how do you think your dishwasher feels about that? Monster!!

[-] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 months ago
[-] EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 months ago

If by conversation you mean asking for a word by describing it conceptually because I can't remember, every day. If you mean telling it about my day and hobbies, never.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

That is basically the best use of LLMs.

A few of the most useful conversations I’ve had with ChatGPT:

[-] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

I had fun with it a dozen times or so when it was new, but I'm not amused anymore. Last time was about a month ago, when someone told me about using chatGPT to seek an answer, and I intentionally found a few prompts that made it spill clear bullshit, to send screenshots making a point that LLMs aren't reliable and asking them factual questions is a bad idea.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

asking them factual questions is a bad idea

This is a crucial point that everybody should make sure their non-techie friends understand. AI is not good at facts. AI is primarily a bullshitter. They are really only useful where facts don't matter, like planning events, finding ways to spend time, creating art, etc..

[-] subignition@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If you're prepared to fact check what it gives you, it can still be a pretty useful tool for breaking down unfamiliar things or for brainstorming. And I'm saying that as someone with a very realistic/concerned view about its limitations.

Used it earlier this week as a jumping off point for troubleshooting a problem I was having with the USMT in Windows 11.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Absolutely. With code (and I suppose it's of other logical truths) it's easier because you can ask it to write a test for the code, though the test may be invalid so you have to check that. With arbitrary facts, I usually ask "is that true?" To have it check itself. Sometimes it just gets into a loop of lies, but other times it actually does tell the truth.

[-] ChefTyler1980@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago
[-] metaphortune@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I've done it once or twice in the early days to see what was up, never since then.

[-] Resol@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

It's simple: I don't.

[-] bear@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 months ago

Only to try out the next big upgrade. It will never be human or superhuman.

[-] Zeratul@lemmus.org -2 points 4 months ago

Your lack of faith is disturbing.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Don’t be too proud of this technological terror you’ve created. The ability to compose haiku is insignificant next to the power of a nice hug.

[-] Zeratul@lemmus.org 2 points 4 months ago

Lol somebody downvoted you. I love a good hug

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

All too easy

[-] FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Maybe 1-3 times a day. I find that the newest version of ChatGPT (4o) typically returns answers that are faster and better quality than a search engine inquiry, especially for inquiries that have a bit more conceptualization required or are more bespoke (i.e give me recipes to use up these 3 ingredients etc) so it has replaced search engines for me in those cases.

[-] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

I forgot how the conversation went, but one day, a conversation I had with someone about comprehensibility (which was often an issue) compelled me to talk to an AI, a talk which I remember from the fact the AI did now have such issues as the complaining humans had.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah I’ve run into this a bit. People say it “doesn’t understand” things, but when I ask for a definition of “understand” I usually just get downvotes.

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

The closest I come to chatting is asking github co-pilot to explain syntax when I'm learning a new language. I just needed to contribute a class library to an existing C# API, hadn't done OOP in 15 years, and had never touched dotNet.

[-] HornyOnMain@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago

Not as much as I did at the beginning, but I mainly chalk that up to learning more about its limitations and getting better at detecting its bullshit. I no longer go to it for designing because it doesn't do it well at the scale i need. Now it's mainly used to refractor already working code, to remember what a kind of feature is called, and to catch random bugs that usually end up being typos that are hard to see visually. Past that, i only use it for code generation a line at a time with copilot, or sometimes a function at a time if the function is super simple but tedious to type, and even then i only accept the suggestion that i was already thinking of typing.

Basically it's become fancy autocomplete, but that's still saved me a tremendous amount of time.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Once or twice a week

[-] GreenSofaBed@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

I use Perplexity pretty much every day. It actually gives me the answers I'm looking for, while the search engines just return blog spam and ads.

[-] Zeratul@lemmus.org 1 points 4 months ago

I had a professor tell our class straight up, use perplexity, just put it in your own own words.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It varies. Sometimes several times a day, sometimes none for a week or two. I'd say about half of those conversations are about software design.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe 3-4 times a year. Can't see using it more than that at this point.

[-] OutrageousUmpire@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Multiple times throughout the day. I co-work on personal projects with several different LLMs. Primarily Claude, but also GPT-4o and Llama 70b.

[-] KestrelAlex@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I've never tried to have what I would call a conversation, but I use it as a tool for both fixing/improving writing and for writing basic scripts in autohotkey, which it's fairly good at.

It's language models are good for removing the emotional work from customer service - either giving bad news in a very detached professional way or being polite and professional when what I want is to call someone a fartknocker.

[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I mean, if asking to help with code/poorly explained JS libraries counts then... Pretty much every day. Other than that... very rarely.

[-] notnotmike@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

Conversations as in a back and forth? Never. Not much of a point to it.

Asking questions about topics? On occasion. I find myself distrustful of hallucinations so I usually use it as a jumping off point.

Asking about bugs and documentation? Once a day at least

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

I ask additional questions or provide information from my side to get a better answer, but I'm still doing this to solve a problem or gather knowledge. I guess that counts as a conversation, but not a casual one.

[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

Once every few months

[-] subspaceinterferents@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago
[-] benjamin_@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

I've attempted to use it to program an android app.

2 weeks of effort... It'll finally build without issue, but still won't run.

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
25 points (80.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26709 readers
1469 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics.


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS