this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
527 points (100.0% liked)

196

16557 readers
1622 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/18403578

Protestation

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lessthanluigi@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Dude looks miserable in both photos and I just want to give him a hug and let him cry on my shoulder.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That's how they get you to agree to a 30 minute lunch break..

[–] lessthanluigi@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

And to think it would snap him out of his sociopathic thinking socially brought onto him by capitalistic ideology.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When I got my first corporate job, I was lectured about the concept of a "working lunch."

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Personally, I’m fine with a working lunch, as long as I stay clocked in. Because it means I either pick up OT at the end of the day, or I get to leave early. But this only works because I have a fairly flexible schedule, set my own meetings, etc… And I certainly wouldn’t try to enforce it on my coworkers, because they may want to be able to walk away and disconnect for a while.

Meal time is time for whatever you want to do; If you want to stay at your desk and play catch-up on some emails, then great. If you want to walk away and de-stress for an hour, then great. Neither one should be the expectation, because the time should be at the employee’s discretion, not the employer’s.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

To paraphrase my manager, "It would behoove you to consider what you can do for the company."

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

30 minute lunch break and having to ask permission to take it.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Just out of frame there are a hundred shareholders cheering him on. The miserable look is an act.

[–] emmeram@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is true of an enterprise/company union. Industrial unions tip the seesaw to the other side.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 4 months ago

As they should

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

What about when the president of your union also sits on the board for your execs :')

(What happens is they don't fight for you and you all get fucked and still have to pay your fees to those mf-ers)

I'm not anti-union, just anti- my union.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Elect a different union president?

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

We have now but the damage is done.

[–] Srh@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What is your union? Cause I don't believe you.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I'm a public servant and our ex-president (who was in charge at the time of our strike) was sitting on the executive board for the party in power. It was a very big issue and they have since been voted out.

[–] yum 3 points 4 months ago
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Where are his hands going in the second panel?

SIR DO YOU NEED TO PEE, THERE IS A ROY ROGERS OVER THE HILL (literally and figuratively)