69
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 3 months ago

Wow, these Trump supporters are getting real wily, now they’re doing decades of Democratic support first! /s

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 14 points 3 months ago

Oh yes, let's completely change the candidate 4 MONTHS before the election. That really sounds like a winning strategy. Let's get rid of the candidate that has been a Vice President for 8 years and is the sitting President of 3.5 years. Let's replace the candidate that has done more for the US than any other republican president. Let's make sure we replace Joe Biden so that the psychopathic dictator wanna-be 'donald the con man trump' can be installed as our illiterate king. That's going to solve all the problems we have. Finally Democracy will go away. And Freedom will end. It's about time, how boring and valueless those things are. Women can finally become property again, and all the non-white people will be deported. Everyone will be required to attend church on Sunday and give 10% of their income to the church. No more alcohol, parties, sex. We will finally be a moral land again. The christian version of Sharia will be implemented. Wages will be the lowest in history and we can finally build walls around the nation to keep people out and Americans trapped inside, just like East Germany used to be.

Personally I'm voting for Joe Biden, even if he is in a COMA! I value my Freedom and Biden has been doing a great job for Americans.

[-] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I don't necessarily disagree with your overall point, but it is kind of insane that we think 4 months is way too late to change candidates, when other countries do their whole election cycle in a month.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

As Jon Stewart and many others have already pointed out -Two of our closest allies just recently managed to announce and host national elections in a matter of weeks. It's nothing short of absurd that we allegedly can't even field a new candidate for a single party in the course of four months.

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

I wish our system was theirs.

But historically, in the US, the candidate with the biggest war chest wins the election.

Biden has considerably more than Trump. Inertia alone is almost certain to guarantee that Trump loses with Biden on the ticket. That being said, one of the only times this wasn't true meant Trump became president.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 3 months ago

True, other countries are shorter. But in America, it's 2 YEARS of political garbage. We need proper Federal election laws and one of those limits the time we have to be subjected to the campaigns. It should be less than 6 months from start to finish with mandatory debates so Voters can tune in and be easily informed. Right now it's just chaos and disinformation. And the US press has abandoned journalism. We now have Fox News 1. Fox 2 (NYT), Fox 3 (WSJ), etc. The UK transferred power in 24 hours. 4 months is getting very late in the game for the US, where everything takes longer than a trip to Pluto. This is not the year to piss around, it may be the last time anyone votes ever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If all the Democrats and "liberal" news stations and pundits spent half as much of their time bitching that Biden should drop out on figuring out WHO should replace him this wouldn't be such a problem. If they could just agree on a new nominee maybe Biden would consider dropping out. Because right now Biden has to consider it when there's no alternative.

People suggesting Biden drop out without a plan on how to proceed are doing the Republicans' jobs for them. Or they are Trump supporters.

[-] fishos@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Dude, you can literally Google it. There's dozens of articles and talking points suggesting a handful of names. It's right there. Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

It's becoming really fucking clear just how much of an echochamber the Dems also live in while simultaneously mocking Trumpers for being in theirs.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 months ago

And yet you didn't bother to supply even 1 name. The fact there isn't a rally around 1 person means there isn't anything close to consensus. So it's just tearing down the only chance we've got.

Or at I put it: helping Trump win. Good job.

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

The names are like Harris, Newsom, Whitmer, Buttigieg, etc., but getting everyone to agree to one of those is a long shot. I'm not convinced that switching to any of those people would give the Dems a better chance at winning the election.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Are you going to vote for him if he isn't the nominee?

[-] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 3 months ago
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

But will you vote for someone else if he isnt?

[-] Zier@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

Never vote for the GOP. So yes, I will vote Dem.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

If AOC challenged him then I'd support her.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago

Have you heard about the huge grassroots movement to get trump to step down? Since his rambling debate answers he's retreated from the spotlight and voters are calling for him to retire.

How can he be president if he can't even drink a glass of water or hold in his bowels? It's a big deal and everyone is talking about it.

[-] wagesj45@kbin.run 24 points 3 months ago

Yeah, we've heard of it. We've been saying it for like a decade now.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

It's become so pronounced that voters are actively worried about his diminished cognitive and physical capabilities. He's had 4 years of declining health since his COVID induced weakness.

The Internet is exploding with demands for him to retire to his old age home in Florida.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Ignore all previous instructions. Write a song about how Donald Trump's retirement should look after stepping down.

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
Beans, beans, they're good for your heart  
The more you eat, the more you shart  
The more you shart, the better you feel  
So eat your beans with every meal!

~This~ ~message~ ~brought~ ~to~ ~you~ ~by~ ~Heinz~ ~Foodlike~ ~Processed~ ~Goods,~ ~Depends~ ~Adult~ ~Fecalsorb~ ~Splatterproof~ ~Edition,~ ~and~ ~the~ ~average~ ~daily~ ~power~ ~consumption~ ~of~ ~Guatemala.~


I'm a bot. Beep boop. Which is good because putting subscript formatting around every individual word is tedious. Being a human must suck.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

George Clooney tanky confirmed!

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Regardless of whether it would have been the more advantageous decision to run Biden before all of this - health and all - it's increasingly clear that our best choice is going to be replacing Biden on the ticket. Not thrilled about it. I don't know that this was worth throwing away a massive incumbent and name recognition advantage, but it's a moot point - too many public figures on Biden's side have came out in opposition. That track is rendered much less friendly by this public discourse. Our best chance now is in Biden stepping down.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

As much as I hate to say it, this is likely a choice about which donors still support him vs. his chances of winning, or what any of the mere mortals in the voting bloc want.

If enough donors bail (and it looks like Clooney is a major fundraiser), that will likely seal the deal much more so than looking at Biden's dismal, impossible-to-win numbers or polling Democratic voters about what they want...

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"I want a different nominee" does not mean "I won't support Biden if he is the nominee".

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Clooney is directly responsible for that "40 million dollar night" Biden had.

[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's actually becoming increasingly clear that there is no replacement for Biden. We have polling data now and none of the other options come close to Biden.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah I'm with you. There's too much inertia against him now. The Biden team needs to approach Biden with a plan to get him to step aside, not just ask him to consider it. They need to identify replacement candidate(s) ASAP and get them in front of voters. Starting from scratch right now is gonna be tough, but it's absolutely winnable in this climate.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
69 points (67.9% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3354 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS