this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
111 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4355 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sxan@midwest.social 23 points 3 months ago

No.

Fuck you, GOP. The only acceptable intolerance is intolerance.

I shall fight you on the beaches, I shall fight you on the landing grounds, I shall fight you in the fields and in the streets, I shall fight you in the hills; I shall never surrender my country to your bigotry and fascism.*

(*) All credit to Churchill

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

"Unity" to the GOP means everyone acquiesces to them.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As it does more often than not, “unity” means “I’m gonna keep doing the same crazy and explicitly hostile shit I’ve always been doing, and I want you to unify with the idea of me doing that and not give me any static about it”

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 3 months ago

They call for unity from the perspective of the abuser.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

All these "journalist" need to stop with these "both sides" headline bullshit. The RNC contained nothing about unity, and they continued their calls for violence. The media needs to wise up at some point and realize that a Trump win means that Project 2025 will allow him to turn all media into state sponsored propaganda machines, else lose their license and be out of business. So unless they all want to be the next RT (which Trump really only needs one), they better stop this whole "balanced" nonsense and start reporting on these monsters for the danger that they are. Continuing to treat them like they have "turned a corner" just continues to normalize their destruction of norms and disdain for the law.

This title should read more like, "During an unhinged RNC, GOP nominate Trump and call on MAGA to 'fight, fight, fight' against democracy".

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What in this headline is “both sides”? It’s literally all about how the GOP is full of shit

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 3 months ago

The whole title. They had no talk of unity, and repeating it even to later denounce it only aids the ring wing talking points, and is completely missed by people only reading headlines.

I read that title as, the GOP calling for unity even amongst its growing hard right faction, but not a bit of that is true.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

GOP "unity" is "we shall dictate to you and you will unify with that."

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

"Stop resisting"

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

I can't deny they've done a good job of reaching out to traditional Republicans. You can call them liars all you want and I agree but what matters is who was on stage. Maga isn't worried and the suburban "I'm not racists" think there is a moral center to the party.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Trump was commenting on getting revenge on political foes like a week ago and uses the word "unity" haha

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not hard to have "unity" when they've worked to purge anyone from the party who disagreed with the cult.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

And they want to bring that same "unity" to normal Americans, too.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The Nazis were for unity, too. Unity under one Reich for all of Europe (at least).

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Analysts say a stew of extreme ideologies simmers under the softer image the RNC projected this week of a party that would make room for any MAGA-style patriot, whether a rap-world model or a Nicaraguan immigrant or a Sikh attorney.

He drew outrage for a speech at a church last month in which he said, “Some people need killing.” Mike Lonergan, Robinson’s campaign spokesman, said on X that the candidate’s words referenced World War II enemies and were taken out of context in a “gutless and dishonest smear.”

Greene has said that if she had led the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, “it would’ve been armed” and “we would have won.” At the RNC, she ridiculed Democrats for observing Transgender Visibility Day, for allowing “millions of illegal aliens to pour in” and for failing to provide “unity.”

Within the convention, White supremacist or anti-government symbols of the sort that are sometimes visible at Trump rallies were scarce among attendees, though one woman sported a dress designed like an “Appeal to Heaven” flag, which is associated with Christian nationalism and political violence.

Texas delegate Adolpho Telles, 74, noted that the gathering also featured more establishment Republican figures, such as former U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley and Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, along with some surprise appearances that were interpreted as gestures toward national unity.

As Haley was onstage urging the crowd to embrace a big-tent Republican vision, Dhillon was on the receiving end of bigoted online attacks from fellow conservatives Across social media, pro-Trump commenters blasted her “satanic chants” and “witchcraft,” calling her a “pagan blasphemer” and demanding her deportation.


The original article contains 1,928 words, the summary contains 271 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And those people further left will continue trying to work with these fucking goons who won't even come to the table, let alone compromise on anything.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

if an election defeat is bad enough, it does not matter if they "come to the table".

our government has been fractured for so long, its hard to remember when it actually worked.

please vote - so that, with luck, we might be able to vote again.