I think she can assemble her own coalition.
This question annoys me. It’s her coalition. She’ll build it how she wants. It might look familiar, it might be something new.
But it’s hers to build- not Obama’s, not Biden’s. Hers. Let it be hers.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I think she can assemble her own coalition.
This question annoys me. It’s her coalition. She’ll build it how she wants. It might look familiar, it might be something new.
But it’s hers to build- not Obama’s, not Biden’s. Hers. Let it be hers.
If she takes that approach she's doomed. Most of us discovered that 'hope and change™' only applied to the donor class
It would be best not to run back that whole song and dance.
Why don't we not emulate the president that had a super majority and gave us the dumpster fire of the ACA. In my lifetime Biden was by far the best president but second choice is a fucking cliff with both Obama and Clinton being deeply flawed neoliberals.