6
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] baggins@beehaw.org 8 points 3 months ago
[-] senseamidmadness@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago

You should read the article -- they actually tested and proved it won't melt down when it loses all active cooling.

[-] baggins@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

Yes we know. But history has a way of proving absolute certainties wrong.

[-] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

They call it: 泰坦尼克号

[-] senseamidmadness@beehaw.org 8 points 3 months ago

That's awesome -- for folks who didn't read the article they actively tested the reactor's passive cooling by shutting off all its power systems. It cooled itself to ambient temperature with no meltdown in less than 35 hours with no active coolant flow.

[-] OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org 7 points 3 months ago

Iirc, some SMR designs also have this property designed, though this is the very first I've heard of it actually being tested at scale.

[-] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago

Exactly! It actually seems very promising.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 5 points 3 months ago

Has it met the titanic?

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3916 readers
1 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS