US News

2048 readers

54 users here now

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml

‘Boneless’ chicken wings can have bones, the Ohio Supreme Court says (www.npr.org)

submitted 3 months ago by reazonozaer@lemmygrad.ml to c/us_news@lemmygrad.ml

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On Thursday, Ohio’s Supreme Court ruled that the restaurant and its suppliers were not liable for Berkheimer’s injury, deciding that "boneless" referred to a cooking style

Writing for the Court majority, Justice Joseph T. Deters said, “A diner reading ‘boneless wings’ on a menu would no more believe that the restaurant was warranting the absence of bones in the items than believe that the items were made from chicken wings, just as a person eating ‘chicken fingers’ would know that he had not been served fingers.”

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 3 months ago

Every day I have to wake up and deal with the fact that this is considered a real country.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago

This went to the freaking Ohio Supreme Court. Jesus.

My 2 cents, boneless is boneless. It is, and has always been, chicken breast meat for boneless wings. I have never expected deboned wings. Stupid case

[–] VeganicTankie@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is this an issue discussed by the SUPREME COURT?

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The case was more about the liability of restaurants with damage their food causes and how food safety laws are applied. This is just the sensationalized headline.

Also each state has their own Supreme Court. This is not the Supreme Court you’re thinking about.

[–] JoeDaRedTrooperYT@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 months ago

Can't have teeth in Ohio

[–] borschtisgarbo@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 months ago

The west has fallen!!1!1!