I continue to find it odd that in this day and age, with all the information at our fingertips, someone can lie on one TV channel and someone will believe it without even so much as a quick Google to fact check.
In response to the tsunami of propaganda and falsehoods on the Internet, some people decide they simply won’t care about facts anymore because it’s easier.
This is how Russia is today. No one knows what the truth is, so they accept whatever they want and ignore the rest.
Russia benefits from the western approach that when two sides are argue they do it in a good faith, so the truth is in the middle.
This is why the firehose of falsehoods works so well. The victims know that a lot of it are lies, but they also believe that some of it has to be truth.
I feel like that's a lot of people on a lot of things in life.
Google is own my democrats. Only trust orange man.
Not only that, but the fact Twitter has a better mechanism for this with community notes than most media.
How the F- do these media companies air a snippet of him lying without immediately following it up with the facts. The fact that his lies are not even news anymore just saddens me to no end. And it emboldens other psychopaths around the world.
Because then the Donald would stop giving interviews and then they will lose revenue
Tbf Google's AI will hallucinate and out and out lie to you depending on what question you ask it, so maybe it isn't the best source. I agree it amazes me that people can lie like this and not be checked for questioned... And Google use to be the best way to check. Unfortunately it isn't any more. And various news sites have their own agenda and won't always tell you the truth either. Unfortunately I dont know of any source you can quickly check and get a definitive and unequivocal answer any more and I think people like trump understand and exploit this.
It's true that Google is now a pile of shit for targeted searching of a topic, but if you just searched for any claim like "biden convicted documents" I'm sure you would at least not get a list of articles confirming the lie.
EDIT: I just searched the above and it's just a long list of "biden won't face charges", "no charges for biden" and even some "trump falsely claims biden was convicted" already
Yeah, but in the qon cinematic universe, "Big Tech" is in the pocket of liberals (lol). So they cannot trust Google's search results, at least if it counters their worldview.
many argue that there's no "objective" journalism and that the solution is to report it as is or always serve opinion pieces.
imo these proposed solutions suck and we end with more useless data.
None of the things he said were remotely true.
If he said the sky was blue, I'd look out the window to check.
If he said that my first thought would be "oh fuck. What happened to the sky?"
Well, if you're in the Midwest, the sky turns orange or green sometimes....usually right before a tornado shows up.
That's cool.
We could play the outlier game all day and get nowhere. Everyone knows the sky is blue. That's why it's a universal phrase.
I was making a snarky comment along the lines of "even a broken clock is right twice a day".
To be perfectly frank, it often isn’t
Trump is old and quite weird.
It must be a day that ends in Y.
What a weird thing for this old man to say.
Trump is genuinely scared he's going to lose. He's trying to put the stink of his conviction on someone else. He knows it's a massive liability.
To think that, just a couple of weeks ago, he was so confident about cruising to a victory on his newest gimmicks: "unity" and "sanity". Now he's starting to panic, his true self is back, and his ability to control his derangement and worst instincts will only get worse. Love to see it.
He can’t help but be an authoritarian bullshitter. They keep trying to put lipstick on the pig but it only lasts a moment before it goes and rolls in shit again.
Well yeah, you got to forcibly remove the pig from the pen, clean the pen, clean the pig, THEN put the lipstick on.
Lol, projection again Dementia Don.
I feel like this would be slander, wouldn't it? Not that I feel like Biden would file suit because he'd feel it's beneath him, but maybe he ought to try just once. No one should let Trump get away with a single lie he can be held accountable for.
Even if he lost, it would be worth it to hear a judge say no reasonable person would believe a fucking thing that comes out of Trump's mouth.
Rampant lying and yet his supporters will believe it as fact.
His syphilis ridden brain is mush
Dementia will Cementia in absentia
More projection.
There's a difference between having conviction and having A conviction, Donald.
Mediaite Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
Mediaite is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.
Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mediaite/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.
Footer
Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News