Judging by what we have seen from Democratic presidents over the last 40 years, particularly under Obama, the NYT doesn't need to say it. We can assume that Harris will rule as a conservative if elected; the unfortunate side effect of rampant campaign funding from billionaires, who expect a return in their investments.
these polls, which ask only about labels and perceptions, tell you much more about the fuzziness—perhaps even meaninglessness—of those labels than about how well either party’s policy positions align with voters’ interests, and what positions candidates ought to take in order to best represent those voters’ interests. Responsible pollsters would ask about actual, concrete policies in the context of information about their impact; otherwise, as former Gallup editor David Moore has pointed out (FAIR.org, 2/11/22), they merely offer the illusion of public opinion.
Very important point to make- the rhetoric from the Right has been a non-stop chorus of "far-left", "fringe-left", "radical left", about centrist Dems, ever since Trump came to power. It's no wonder that the disinterested voter recalls those labels when not actually asked about policies.
When you ask about building unions, funding education, fixing the environment, lowering healthcare costs, and holding corporations to account, suddenly everyone lines up with Progressive positions.
Socialism
Beehaw's community for socialists, communists, anarchists, and non-authoritarian leftists (this means anti-capitalists) of all stripes. A place for all leftist and labor news and discussion, as long as you're nice about it.
Non-socialists are welcome to come to learn, though it's hard to get to in-depth discussions if the community is constantly fighting over the basics. We ask that non-socialists please be respectful and try not to turn this into a "left vs right" debate forum by asking leading questions or by trying to draw others into a fight.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.