143

Almost quarter of big fashion brands have no decarbonisation plan, report finds (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

DKNY, Tom Ford and Reebok among companies to score 0% in Fashion Revolution report ranking top 250 firms

Almost a quarter of the world’s biggest fashion brands, such as Reebok, Tom Ford and DKNY, do not have a public plan for decarbonisation, a report has found.

The fashion industry can be highly polluting. In some casesforever chemicals have been found in the waters near factories. The industry is also a concerning source of waste, with fast fashion accused of encouraging overconsumption.

The What Fuels Fashion? report, published on Thursday, analyses and ranks 250 of the world’s biggest fashion brands and retailers – those with turnover of $400m (£313m) or more – based on public disclosure of their climate goals and actions.

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] sleen@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

Not suprising. With all those trends and temporary fads, all those clothes have to go somewhere.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

It's really not just the big brands, it's the entire industry. Fast fashion isn't restricted to high-end brands. It's in every badly-made Walmart T-shirt you can wear for maybe a year before it falls apart. It's all a mess. And making your own clothes doesn't even help much because good luck getting well-made fabric you can afford. Plus, you're probably not going to be able to make your own shoes even if you're good with a sewing machine.

[-] porkchop@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Cheap, well-made fabric is available at thrift stores in the form of linens. Curtains, tablecloths, and sheets are a great source of high-quality fabrics for cheap!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

And we should definitely be buying more from thrift stores, but it still doesn't solve problems for things like shoes. Eventually, they wear out. Thrift store ones fairly quickly much of the time. At least when we're talking about practical shoes rather than fashionable ones.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Easy to forget that all of these colorful outfits need to be assembled from colored material. And colors have to come from dye. And dye has to come from somewhere. The chemical process for generating different kinds of dyes and inks carries an enormous ecological impact in the immediate surroundings of the factory. This is especially true in areas of the world with little to no environmental protections, where businesses like DOW Chemical, BASF, and Sinopec are unconstrained in how they dispose of their waste.

[-] quicklime@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

I get a funny feeling that the decarbonization plans of the other 75%+ are worthless or nearly worthless in terms of actually helping humanity in any significant way with the polycrisis at hand. The very existence of a worldwide brand of anything is nowhere near sustainable.

[-] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I’m still rocking good quality tees, coats, jackets, and pants from way back when I was a teenager. I’ve never understood the whole “even though I’ve got plenty to wear, I just NEED a whole new wardrobe!!!” Types.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Why would they?

[-] ArtieShaw@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Environmental, Social, and Governance programs are a trendy topic with investors. For example, if Walmart's shareholders force it to adopt an ES&G program, that that same pressure gets applied by Walmart to their vendors.

That's how it's supposed to work. Devil is in the details, of course. And plenty of "yes buts" to go along with them.

There's an entire industry devoted to auditing and rating companies on their overall score. Ecovadis is one that I can think of off the top of my head. They'll audit you, give you a score, and give you areas where you need to improve.

I haven't decided exactly how cynical I am about the whole thing, but I'm way past letting the perfect strangle the good.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

The Guardian Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: The Guardian Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mixed
Country: United Kingdom
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024

143 points (98.6% liked)

News

22882 readers

3791 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world