this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
34 points (85.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35709 readers
2503 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 35 points 3 months ago

Because they demand recognition via acts of terrorism.

Like we can have a discussion about how closely linked Rojava are to them but the PKK itself is undeniably a terrorist organization that engages in terror tactics to pursue its aims of recognition as an independent state.

Just because we might agree with the IRA in principle doesn't change the fact that they did a fucking lot of car bombings, and the same principle applies here.

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Terrorism = Acts of violence with the purpose of instilling fear. Or something along those lines.

Doesn't matter if you agree with them. I sympathise fully with the root purpose of the PKK and the ETA, and possibly also the IRA. I find that their means sometimes undermine their cause, and it makes me somewhat uncomfortable to be aligned with them politically.

It's possible for people to do terrible things in the name of a good cause.

And "terrorist group" doesn't mean "the baddies" - that's just how it's used in America. Tarantino's jewish gang in Inglorious Basterds would be a text book terrorist organization, but terrorising Nazis is generally considered an okay thing to do.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The best definition we have for terrorism is the threat or use of illegal violence to influence the people beyond the immediate area of the attack to achieve a political, religious, ideological or monetary goal.

It's not necessarily making a moral judgement about terrorism, just how it works. Al Qaeda is a terrorist organization because they used violence and threatened more with the goal of influencing US foreign policy on the basis of Fundamentalist Islamic theology. The IRA were also terrorists for their use and threats of violence with the political goal of unifying Ireland as one nation and taking it back from the British monarchy. Even the Founding Father's of the US could be considered terrorists by this definition. They destroyed property and killed British citizens in our bid for independence affecting the decisions of the monarchy and parliament an entire ocean away.

[–] trebor_project@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like the "illegal violence", without that 'illegal' in there so many governments would be classified as terrorist organisations.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Even as citizens there is precedent for legal violence, like carving out space for self defense. And the existence of combat sports like Boxing, Wrestling, and MMA.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you're are against me you're a terrorist, if you're for me than you're a freedom fighter, simple as that. Has always been like this.

[–] Don_Dickle@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yea but its not like the PKK is staking out claim to a country just a small amount of land from 3 different countries that they could easily give up?

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's not how things work and you know it

[–] Don_Dickle@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Then if you know explain it to me.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 14 points 3 months ago

Any country that gives up little slices of land won't exist after awhile.

The countries and governments that survive are those that fight for every bit of land even if they eventually do give up a slice they need to demonstrate to every neighbor and special interest group that the PRICE for that land is very high indeed. Otherwise... We end up in the first scenario

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

There are people living on that land. People who might resent the ethnostate PKK wants to establish.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

when basically all they want

It is never about what they want. We must judge according to what they do.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wait, so if you overbake chicken until it's dry and I take a dump in the toilet's reservoir it doesn't make me the good guy? Well fuck.. maybe that's why we view teenagers as not having fully developed ideas sometimes

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

They detonated bombs in my hometown multiple times in my lifetime.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 points 3 months ago
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

I mean the Turks who put them on the list are about as tan as they are so....