144
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

Some of the largest U.S. insurance companies say extreme weather has led them to end certain coverages, exclude natural disaster protections and raise premiums

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 year ago

If insurers are refusing to cover disasters, then mortgage lenders should be unable to force buyers to buy (useless) insurance

[-] downpunxx@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

silly cat, that's not how big business collusion and corruption work. mortage lenders will continue to force prospective homeowners to cover and maintain insurance on their properties even if it causes them to default on their payments, then they'll sell the homes again to flippers or multinationals.

[-] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Ah I see. Sounds like big business collusion should be hunted to extinction.

[-] thbb@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

And bankrupt and dispossess the lender if a disaster happens to their newly acquired home?

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

mortgage lenders are going to have to do something. Like require natural disaster be part of the policy. Otherwise they will have people walking away from mortgages after disasters.

[-] lntl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

then they would lose income, not going to happen. let's be honest, premiums will go up and coverage will go down.

[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 29 points 1 year ago

Paying for insurance in places like Florida is going to essentially equate to throwing money straight into a fire.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 year ago

The thing about insurance is that when it's properly regulated, they're able to pay the claims (and actually do so)

Toss out the regulation, and insurance becomes worthless.

[-] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Humans just don't comprehend large sums of money. Taxation created the Interstate Highway system, it sent us to the moon. The masses giving relatively small amounts of money can and does move mountains.

But instead of empowering elected representatives (that we can vote out) to do insurance, we instead farm it out to for-profit insurance companies and, inevitably, attorneys. THIS IS TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION.

We mandate that everyone buy automobile insurance (the masses thereby being taxed) and then when all that money floods in, capitalism is beholden to keep as much of it as possible, so the insurers start fucking the insured with "claims adjustments." Enter the attorneys, who smell the size of the payroll because that's what attorneys do - and they sue the dogshit out of the insurers to get a piece of the action, ostensibly because they just care so much.

Think about how much money is wasted throughout this process due to incompetence, corporate greed and filthy lawyers. When you watch ad-supported television (if you do) think about what percentage of the commercials are for attorneys that exclusively sue insurers. Imagine how much money those commercials represent. Now realize that both the insurers and the attorneys make money hand over fist despite the inefficiency of this deeply stupid dance.

But government isn't the answer to the problem, amirite?

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I was really hoping no fault became the norm.

[-] CosmicApe@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

But something something socialism something government overreach something something!

[-] Notnotmike@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I was thinking about this earlier this week, in a sense. Not quite insurance but throwing away money.

The federal government is going to be providing aid and assistance during and after the hurricane, and I couldn't help but think about how the more mild, less disaster-prone parts of the country are effectively subsidizing people to continue to move to Florida, despite how unlivable it really is. As Florida grows more the rest of the country has to pay too, it doesn't just affect Floridians

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
144 points (98.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5184 readers
462 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS