I dunno why people are hating on this article. It's pretty clear that "blockchain for security" and "AI security" and whatnot are just hype with the added danger of distracting from actual security.
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
28 points (96.7% liked)
Cybersecurity
5646 readers
170 users here now
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !cybersecurity@lemmy.capebreton.social !securitynews@infosec.pub !netsec@links.hackliberty.org !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Back to the root of it: security is a process, not a product. Good security means having sysadmins, network admins, developers, and non-technical employees doing things with infosec in mind.
Mmmm...I think they hype should remain but on the side of the buyer.
The ones implementing the security should remain focused and be extra diligent when deploying. It's super annoying to sell security to companies if they don't care, so keep that hype so these companies are 'excited' to have extra security.
This feels like an ad written by ChatGPT.
This guy wrote a dozen paragraphs and I'm not sure he actually said anything beyond 'work hard guys, shits changing all the time'.