563
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Lmao the Democratic and Republican party are both bought and paid for by corporate money. I wholeheartedly and unabashedly support Harris/Walz but you can fuck right off with this stupid shit that Harris somehow is immune to the reality of our political financing structure (namely, megadonors, corporates, and PACs)

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm holding a hope that Walz hasn't succumbed to the greed yet. Though I expect Harris has to some degree. Like it or not, there is enough money in politics that most of us could probably be bought eventually, to lesser and greater extents.

The real question is "when?''.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Duplicating my comment in one TG chat (and roughly translating it to English):

this is like saying that "some girls are beautiful, and some are nice", or saying to someone "your family is good" ;

what the promises of regulating prices and such really tell is that there's no mention of actually splitting and killing those corporations and reducing their power.

In other words, oligopoly is nice, and power from centralization is nice (of course it is, since what a big corp can do, government can use), it's just prices that we want to fix.

State capitalism with a human face is what she's promising here.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

“No sides”

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"This is communist; this is Marxist; this is fascist.”

— Donald Trump, quoted by the New York Times, describing Kamala Harris’ economic agenda

So she's far-left, extreme-left, and extreme-right all at the same time?

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 22 points 1 month ago

Trump doesn't really know or care about what words mean. He cares about how words feel.

Unfortunately, many people are the same way.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

It's the dementia. He should seek treatment.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Marxist is not extreme left, just a kind of left. You can be anything from a socdem to a bolshevik while remaining Marxist.

And stalinism one can call rather right and fascist, at the same time with Marxism used as a foundation, and it's not as easy as you'd think to find counterarguments to what they've come up in USSR to tie a totalitarian state to Marxism.

So there's one thing which is all these at the same time - stalinism.

By the way, if we give Trump's word hu-uge benefit of doubt and forget for a minute that we are humans, thus tribal apes, this is not that wrong.

She's talking about regulating prices and other populist and pretty socialist things, but she doesn't talk about killing oligopolies and preferential treatment. Which is kinda close to state capitalism with populist elements. Which would in rough strokes make things closer to stalinism in economic part.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

Don't Think. Just Trump.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago
[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

You got that right. Talk is cheap. Presidential candidates are basically used car salesman.

[-] sheogorath@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Since it's cheap, why not the other candidate say the same thing?

[-] vin@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 month ago

The title has no connection with article. Why are y'all upvoting?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, it does, in the sense that Harris has said she's going after greedflation and the article mentions that and then explains how it is definitely, actually greedflation and not normal supply and demand.

No it doesn't in the sense that it doesn't address how she's going to do that, but she hasn't said that either so what else can they say?

[-] vin@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago

Something like Harris to go after greedflation: but what is it? Or something along those lines would be meaningful. Title sounds like she's taking action now, which then leads to disappointment.

[-] Huschke@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You expect people to read the article? You must be new here. 😅

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

On an Ozma post?!?!1? Say it ain't so!!!

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Politician before the election promises stuff.

No, sure this time is different.

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 month ago

Hope so. This is very low hanging fruit.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Kamela is good

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
563 points (94.6% liked)

politics

18874 readers
3721 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS