this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
89 points (91.6% liked)

Android

17658 readers
211 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 98 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

3 years of updates.....

I don't see it listed as supported by lineage OS. That tells me the bootloader isn't open.

In fact, when they forgot to lock the bootloader, they fixed it, and said there was a mistake and they will never make the bootloader available.

https://www.xda-developers.com/nokia-7-2-unlockable-bootloader/

So yeah, fuck these guys, oh look a consumer first repairable phone that you can't install software on f*** you (HMD/Nokia)

I would not be angry, except they're trying to market themselves as consumer friendly, tinker friendly, repairable. So not letting you run software, and only giving you 3 years of updates, is antithetical to that. It's such a contradiction it's an insult

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t see it listed as supported by lineage OS. That tells me the bootloader isn’t open.

It released one month ago. Even if the bootloader were unlockable, it wouldn't be officially supported by LineageOS yet. Someone actually needs to buy the phone, build for it and then maintain that build. For a popular custom ROM series like the Pixels or something, sure they will be supported very quickly, but other models often take quite a bit longer to be supported. Most people who buy this phone will not be buying it to immediately install LineageOS.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 2 months ago

I agree with what you said. Lineage OS is not the only indicator, but it is a strong indicator. Do you have any evidence that the bootloader is unlocked?

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

Thanks for this comment.

Sounds very idiotic to say an android phone is repairable, as the main marketing point, and then lock the bootloader. This doesn't make sense to me, or most others I would presume.

[–] mnmalst@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah my exact thoughts. Repairable phones are mostly useless if the vendor blobs don't get updated anymore after x years. Until we have an open ecosystem, as we have on desktop PCs, repairable phones are only good on paper.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 14 points 2 months ago

The bar is so low, all they have to do is leave the bootloader unlocked, which they've done by accident already, and everyone would be happy and give them praise.

I don't know what they gain by keeping the bootloader locked, maybe somebody thinks it'll force new phone sales?

[–] variants@possumpat.io 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I've never had to change phones because I've broken my phone they always just stop being supported. Repairability is nice but continued support or a way to a different OS that is supported is much more useful

[–] mnmalst@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

Exactly!

I am in the same boat right now. I still use a Pixel 4a. It's a great device, has exactly the size and performance I need, perfect condition but I don't get updates anymore. It's insane that in a time where resources get a real problem this is still allowed. If they can't support it at least force them to open source the software/drivers or something.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is such a scummy move by HMD. Allow boot loader unlocking if you are consumer friendly.

Apart from Fairphone there are really no other options. This is like a poor man's fairphone.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 0 points 2 months ago

Fairphone is midrange too, but the upper mid range. nowadays 700$US is midrange sadly

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 15 points 2 months ago

I believe the term is "greenwashing"

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Well.. I bought a Xiaomi (global) phone on a basis of it being unlockable... And after two months of unsuccessful attempts and useless back and forth with their support, I can only say: fuck Xiaomi too.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My experience with HMD 'phones':

  • Constant disabling/breaking of Bluetooth/Mobile Data/Wifi
  • Bricked after OS update
  • A 'repair software' that can only be used once (one action per activation), needs to be authorized by CS, can only be activated - and therefore used - x times per day and y times per week/month. It's also utterly useless, only 'fixing' stuff temporarily. And stuff breaks more than the software can be used. That in itself sounds absurd, doesn't it?
  • No unlockable bootloader
  • Working together with Etisalat (Arabic Cell Provider), allowing them to install spyware which led to a teenager being endangered by officials and parents tracking him down after he fled due to severe abuse and death sentence
[–] Elkenders@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I've had two USB C ports fail on HMD phones. I like the hardware, love the vanilla android, like the value, but I've never had a USB C port fail on anything else. I know it's just personal experience but it means I can't trust getting another again.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’ve had two USB C ports fail on HMD phones.

Yeah, that's what got my HMD made, Nokia branded, 7 plus. And from a search at the time this was a common problem

[–] Elkenders@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah one was a 7 plus

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I had great experiences with Moto phones - also good hardware for relatively cheap, vanilla OS with no additional apps except a few, actually useful, Moto apps.

[–] Elkenders@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah I've had Motorola phones too but the updates drove me nuts. I'm just on pixel now.

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Article also says to root the phone to install custom OS rather than an unlocked bootloader.

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Lockd bootloader=dead weight and useless after a couple of years, even if it let you replace CPU RAM by your self and I hate phones with locked bootloader

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago

OS ceasing to get support is what leads to a device becoming obsolete these days rather than the hardware.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 17 points 2 months ago

Nice to see that other companies are finally trying to make a phone that can actually compete with the fairphone. Still not as repairable as the fairphone though, and its unacceptable to have a locked bootloader.

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I mean its great that it is repairable, but not so much if pretty much everything else is a compromise for the MSRP.

[–] sunglocto@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

This is e-waste

[–] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 2 months ago

Idk what it is worth but I am happy to see more companies competing with Fairphone.

[–] Ankkuli@lemdro.id 2 points 2 months ago

It has Qi2 at least which seems to be impossible for other Android vendors to implement.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 0 points 2 months ago

Fairphone: πŸ‘οΈπŸ‘„πŸ‘οΈ

[–] MaXimus421@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're not getting Samsung or Google software support unless you buy Samsung or Google phone. You can just apply this to pretty much every Android phone that isn’t made by those two.

So basically every phone that isn't made by Samsung or Google will never be considered to the majority of techies and phone nerds.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't know how it is in the US, but you don't get any support for Pixel where I live.

Samsung on the other hand is excellent, they even have retail locations.

[–] MaXimus421@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I fail to understand how that information is essential to the topic at hand. The device could be MAXED OUT on specs, nerds will always cry about software support. And 3 yrs isn't enough to them.

Now yall can downvote all ya'd like. But you know I'm speaking the truth. There is no amount of hardware that will get American nerds to accept anything less that what Samsung or Google offer for software support.

I can prove this extremely easily. Anyone could.