22
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by RedWizard@hexbear.net to c/electoralism@hexbear.net

I'm just going to outline some stuff that's been floating around in my head since observing the monstrosity that was the DNC this week.

  • The uncommitted movement caused the Democratic Party to flinch and push for Biden's removal. This seems clear to me.
  • Piggy backing on the Uncommitted Movement were disillusioned liberals who were convinced Biden was not going to win a second term. They were Uncommitted based on that belief and nothing more.
  • The resolution of this tension, through Biden dropping out and Kamala taking the rains, caused those disillusioned liberals who voted uncommitted to finally be set free. They have fully embraced Kamala as the new candidate uncritically.
  • After several weeks of strong polling numbers, it becomes clear that the number of uncommitted voters has now been shrunk dramatically. Only those whose original position was centered on Gaza remain. For those now freed liberals, Gaza came to become a conditional issue instead of a primary issue.
  • Harris lets the mask slip at a rally, telling the remaining uncommitted movement "I'm speaking now", which grants a license to the Islamophobic members of the party to go mask off. Turning the phrase into a shibboleth of sorts, signaling their disdain for Muslims at large.
  • This mask off moment comes into full bloom at the DNC. Shouting down fellow Palestinian members. Physically accosting them with their "I ♥ Joe" signs. The complete absence of their mention by anyone on stage. The blatant lies about the efforts towards a ceasefire. These Islamophobes have been here the whole time, waiting for their license to finally free themselves from the performance art that is their care for the minority.

In this group of liberals, there exists two kinds:

  1. The Islamophobic majority, ready and willing to perform a transfer of suffering out of the empirical core and to Palestinians and Muslims abroad.
  2. The abused minority, who know their only survival is to plug their ears and walk fast so that their conscious does not catch them. They know, because the Democrats tell them so, that if they vote any other way, they will be the ones who suffer as well. So they too hope to cast their suffering abroad onto others to save themselves.

It's clear to both these groups that the Democrats will be moving on with their plans regardless. This is also apparent in the spectacle that was the DNC and the Kamala campaign at large. A distinct lack of detailed policy talk, and a very apparent parade of circus members to keep the vibes high and the thoughts empty.

One thing that I think people should take away from this is that the uncommitted movement was effective. It played chicken with the Democratic Party and the party flinched. They made moves that ultimately satisfied, quenched the fear and uncertainty that was festering among some of the movement members.

However, it leads me to some speculation:

Should this next 4 years result in a larger movement, where those abused minorities realize they were always going to be abused regardless, it likely means that any real pushback against the Democratic Party and its goals will lead to the party loosing in congressional elections and even the presidential elections. Republicans often win when voter turnout for the Democratic Party is low. They have to make serious moves to win when turnout is high. Weaponizing the Electoral Collage and the Supreme Court as a couple of examples.

Any truly progressive movement, I think, will result in some of the strongest wins for the Republican Party, if only because of the stubbornness of the Democratic Party at large.

There could be other ways these contradictions will eventually resolve, but based on the motions of the Democratic Party so far this cycle, I feel they've become emboldened to be their full selves, and will believe that if they can achieve victory again this time around, they can continue the same platform of empire with little pushback. This has been historically true, but what isn't historically true is the unprecedented visibility of the atrocities being committed by the party and the global disdain for the empire's actions.

I think their stubborn commitment to this project of empire, and the broadcasting of its disastrous results, could begin to chip away at the "Progressive Left", and push them even further left. However, in doing so, it is going to lead to several years of suffering at the hands of Republican rule. This could create a cycle of awakening, leading to a broader mass movement, but there is no way to know for sure.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

I would argue that the majority you’re talking about in the two kinds of libs here is not fundamentally animated by disdain for Palestinians and Muslims. Rather, they desperately want their sense of normalcy sustained. Biden’s poll numbers and his brain leaking out his ears threatened that, but now Harris has restored the veil of the end of history and infinite brunch. The Palestinian cause pokes little holes in that veil and that’s why they react with such contempt for it. They want status quo and if that means genocide, they’re wiling to “pay” that price.

As far as emboldening/strengthening the left down the line, and cycles, I realized today that it’s highly likely the Democrats will be holding the White House from 2029-2033. If Trump wins in November, he can’t run for another term, his second term would animate libs to GOTV, and no one else in the party is going to have the Trump secret saucel, so democrats win. Trump loses in November, well the trend has been for decades now that presidents win a second term. It takes unique circumstances for it not to happen. So Harris wins a second term. Either way, that period had a Democrat in office.

But what’s the other thing that’s been on a pretty dependent 8-12 year cycle going back to the late 70’s? That’s right, major economic crises! Stagflation, S&L scandal/black Monday, dot-com/9-11 recession, Great Recession, COVID. So we’re on schedule to have the next one hit late 20’s/early 30’s, and the Dems will be holding the bag. The left should be ready and waiting for that to happen with a plan and message more concrete and organized than what Occupy was able to do.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

electoralism

21955 readers
53 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS