this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
47 points (96.1% liked)

World News

38979 readers
3904 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I don't know, could have something to do with the whole climate change disaster the collective scientific community has been warning about for literally decades now

[–] apemint@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The sad part is, no matter how bad things will get, the same people will keep denying climate change. Even as their shoes melt into the pavement.

Looking at the past, I don't have any hope for meaningful change.
Just last year or so we've had people on their literal death beads denying corona is real.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Looking at the past, I don't have any hope for meaningful change.
Just last year or so we've had people on their literal death beads denying corona is real.

You're not even wrong. Even when people weren't denying the reality of the situation, so many still refused to do any of the measures designed to stop it, then blamed everyone else around them.

It wad a depressing time to see how rabid and divided people are that somehow the existence of a virus that was literally killing millions of people, and leaving even more crippled existed or not became a political game.

[–] Erk@cdda.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There will be denial forever, but watch out now for the new propaganda trend, "it's too late to do anything". It feels woke and tends to be anticorporate in flavour, but it leads to the same end as denialism.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

The problem with that is to a certain extent it is too late. What we were warned would happen decades ago if we didn't stop is already on our doorstep - climate distasters are getting worse by the year, and temperature records are being leapfrogged left and right.

The next few decades are likely gonna be rough no matter what we as individuals do, because the world's governments are too hesitant to make the drastic changes needed, and most companies won't life a finger until financial incentive comes about or they're made to.

We the people do have power, but many of us lack the time, resources, and/or money to greenify our lives in the ways that we really need to, on thr scale that we need to be doing now.

That's NOT to say however that we shouldn't do anything at all, that we shouldn't press our governments to do anything at all - as the saying goes:

The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is today.

Even little gestures will help in the long, long term.

[–] apemint@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree that the “it’s too late to do anything” mentality is just as bad as doing nothing, but at the same time I recognize that the scientific consensus is more and more leaning towards "it really is too late to do anything" in the short term at least.

Certain gears have been set in motion that we truly cannot stop, but there are also other things that we can prevent if we act now.

I just don't know where the line between the two lies.

The next 50 years or so are set in stone, of that I'm certain.
But after that, who knows whether the changes we make today will affect the climate in a meaningful way. One can only hope.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was always to late to do anything, because we live on a fractured planet where people who have destroyed it, and their bought off politicians, dictate that its okay to continue destroying it.

The only thing that will change anything is a violent global ww3 level revolution leading to a single world government that can do what needs to be done, and do it quickly, with the worlds entire resources at its disposal. and funding it all by seizing all the now dead billion/trillionaires money.

[–] CapitalismsRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Last night my dad was talking about this "liberal propaganda" about the "supposed climate crisis" talking about the movie Don't Look Up. Fuck it pissed me off, I don't know how to respond to that. Conservatives aren't in reality, every fact that disagrees with their backwards fantasy is just some kind of liberal conspiracy that "wise" men would never bother considering.

[–] apemint@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's really messed up how the world can be reduced to binary opinions.

By definition, liberals think more freely and are willing to entertain new ideas. With that of course comes that some of those ideas turn out to be counter productive or straight up bad. Ideally, this is when real liberals acknowledge this and shift to something else.

Conservatives on the other hand see this as a sign of weakness and misguidedness, so they take a stance rooted in what they "know" to be true. When that knowledge turns out to be false, they can't simply pivot because that would make them the same as liberals.

Not to mention, sticking to your guns is so much easier than admitting you were wrong and starting from zero again.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Change my opinion and position as I get new information? What do you think I am? Some kind of woke liberal communist!? /s

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Genuinely. What's the point. There's no convincing them because any evidence you could convince them with they've already deemed invalid before they've even laid eyes on it.

They're "sceptics" in the worst way possible in that they don't apply that scepticism to themselves.

[–] 4am@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They all think they figured the world out when they were just kids - and it shows.

[–] Ponchy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if the majority of those people came to understand what was happening and truly believe the scientists, it'll already be at the point where saying "I was wrong all these years" comes about just too late

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Those types of people are so short sighted they can't see further than their nose, so of course they'll only see the problem when it's already here.

Many won't even concede that they were wrong, they'll blame the scientists for not stopping them.

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just to add to this, Climate Change itself is a lot more than mere Global Warming - since weather is mathematically a Chaotic System, the extra energy retained in the system due to greenhouse gases not only increases the average temperature but also makes extreme weather (not just of the high temperature kind) more likely to happen, hence things like for example many and strong storms in a short-time frame which were the kind of combination that used to happen every couple of decades now happenning every couple of years.

Hence why over the last decade we've seen extreme weather events a lot more and more often.

The high temperature related records broken now (due to the combination with El Niño) are but a subset of the weather record-breaking that's been happenning in the last couple of years.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

A lot of people think climate change is just heat and desertification.

And its not.

its more akin to a shot of nitrous in your car engine. It will take the normal systems and ramp them up to a realm not normally feasible. Hot weather will get hotter. Hot weather will reach further to places it never did before in summer. Cold weather will get colder. Cold weather will reach further into areas it never did before in in winter. Storms will be more intense. Hurricanes larger. Tornados more prevalent.

But we can't do anything because the rich and their bought politicians would rather stay the course to continue to extract every last ounce of profit from the planet, then ride out the storm on the high seas on their high end expensive mega yachts.

[–] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] emptyother@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

#4MoreYearsAndTheRemainingRichPeopleWeHaventEatenLeavesEarthOnARocket

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'll never survive, unless they take hundreds of poors with them to support them. Cause all their money wont mean shit on mars, when they have to shit in a bag and live in a inflated tent that will kill them all if it tears.

[–] emptyother@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Would be ironic then that what kills them is a lack of longterm thinking.

[–] HandOfDoom@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
We drive our cars and planes
And burn the fossil fuels
We ignore the scientists
And call them climate fools

We chop down all the forests
And fill the seas with trash
We melt the polar ice caps
And watch the glaciers crash

We suffer and we will die
From the heat as we get older
But hey, at least we created a lot of value
For our dear shareholders
[–] vita_man@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Beautiful and sad. Reminds me of u/poemforyoursprog

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's summer In the northern hemisphere... That's where most of the land on earth is

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because we're governed by a large group of people who rely on fossil fuel countries and companies for campaign cash and the rest are more concerned with owning the libs than doing anything useful.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep. Nothing changes because the people that have the power to make the changes don't want to. The system as it is right now works for them. So why the hell would they want to change that? And most of them won't be around to see the devastation so there is another level of apathy to all of it.

We can't get out from underneath this monster it's too late for that. But I hope that we can start putting people into power that are genuinely concerned about this climate crisis and start the true (massive) step to moving us off the path to total uninhabitability

[–] FleaCatcher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds like a tipping point to me, but I am not smart.

[–] HerbErtlinger@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago

“Gradually, then suddenly.”

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well tentative take I saw from a climate scientist (in the news I think) was that it might be a flickering of a tipping point. The idea being that complex systems can temporarily look like a new state that they're close to tipping into but not quite there yet. If true, it would mean that we're closer to some tipping point than we thought or would like and this is a kind of prelude.

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like this is effectively denialism at this point. We're looking at serious crop loss (80% by some estimates) across the US and Canada and it's only going to get worse without massive projects or geoengineering. Combine that with a Russia/Ukraine war and we're looking at 1,4,5,6 and 9 of the worlds top 10 wheat producers looking at a minimal crop. We're far closer to famine than we realize.

[–] smokinjoe@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Fucked around to increase shareholder value.

[–] lildictator@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I need my lifted pickup truck To hAUl ThInGS. How can I go grocery shopping without a vehicle the size of a minibus? And how would other people know how strong and wealthy I am if I were to walk, ride a bike or use transit? I need a big metal box around me to protect my insecurity.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

While I certainly don't want to defend the kind of asshats that insist on doing something as stupid and obnoxious as "rolling coal" I do need to point out that large swaths of the US are currently not setup in such a way that you can realistically get around without a vehicle of some kind. Massive work on public transit plus a fundamental urban planning design change needs to take place before walking, biking, or public transit is a viable way to get from point A to point B.

So until those changes are made, yes most Americans will need a electric or ICE vehicle. It doesn't need to be an inefficient pollution spewing behemoth, but it does need to be something. Really though aside from people intentionally modifying their vehicles to be less efficient and more polluting modern cars are pretty efficient and clean.

The primary vehicle contributor to both global warming and pollution isn't even cars though, it's ships by a landslide. It isn't even remotely close. Cruise ships and particularly the giant container ships used to move goods internationally are hugely inefficient and polluting with just one ship putting out in a single day the equivalent of multiple cars worth of pollution for an entire year.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The primary vehicle contributor to both global warming and pollution isn’t even cars though, it’s ships by a landslide. It isn’t even remotely close. Cruise ships and particularly the giant container ships used to move goods internationally are hugely inefficient and polluting with just one ship putting out in a single day the equivalent of multiple cars worth of pollution for an entire year.

Bullshit.

https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector

Road transportation: 11.9%

Shipping: 1.7%

Ocean liners are very dirty yes but they're actually very efficient compared to cars and trucks precisely because they're so massive. They move a huge amount of goods. Put the same amount of goods on trucks and you get an order of magnitude more emissions.

Oh and electricity and heating create almost twice as much ghg emissions as transportation. Which is why supporting renewables is the single most important thing anyone can do for the environment.

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, the meat industry produces more than both of those combined at 15%.

And that's something you can stop today right now if you want to.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I stopped two years ago, for ethical reasons though.

[–] ramblechat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I also read that what is not taken into account is that the people on the cruise ships are not somewhere else - so you have hundreds of thousands of people who are not driving, heating houses, flying, or basically not doing other things that could cause emissions. Whether it has an effect or not I don't know, but it does sort of make sense.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vita_man@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Climate change? Global warming?

[–] coldv@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Didn't a couple of years ago scientist warned that we have past the point of no return?

[–] Erk@cdda.social 3 points 1 year ago

We probably are but it's also very important to remember that were not past the point of no survival. The trend for oil propaganda has been to go from "climate change is fake" to "it's real but it's too late to do anything". It's too late to go back, but it's not too late to act. Don't forget that.

[–] aluminiumsandworm@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

there are many "points of no return". the first irrevocable damage was done when we started burning coal hundreds of years ago, and every year we pass new points after which the earth will be forever changed. that doesn't mean all life is screwed, or humanity will die out. it does mean that things are going to get a lot worse, and the degree to which they're going to get worse is increasing every day we don't address the issue.

the one thing climate scientists DO NOT want you to think is that we are doomed and that it is hopeless. things are bad, and getting worse, but the actions we take DO MATTER.

~~burn down an oil refinery (in minecraft)~~

[–] ShakyPerception@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There is a scene in the TV show Newsroom (with Jeff Daniels) where he (the news show anchor) is interviewing a climate scientist about the climate change situation. Everything the scientist says eludes to the fact that we are completely screwed. That everything we are trying would have been great things to start doing 20+ years ago. At this point we have already passed the point of recovery.

It was aired in like 2015, and I think of it every time someone talks about this, and what a surprise this whole thing is.

load more comments
view more: next ›