75
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Mexico’s president told reporters Tuesday he has put relations with the United States and Canadian embassies “on pause” after the two countries voiced concerns over a proposed judicial overhaul that critics say could undermine the independence of the judiciary.

President Andrés Manuel López Obrador didn’t elaborate on what a pause would mean. It’s not a term used in formal diplomatic codes, and Mexico’s foreign ministry did not respond to an Associated Press request for comment about what it would entail.

The judicial overhaul proposal, suggested by the Mexican president during his final weeks in office, includes having judges elected to office, something analysts, judges and international observers fear would stack courts with politically biased judges with little experience. It has spurred major protests and strikes and wide criticism from investors and financial institutions.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

It seems like "on pause" means very little here except as a gesture of displeasure at the US and Canadians' expressions of displeasure at the proposed judicial reforms.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Most diplomatic gestures are just that. Most actual diplomacy continues regardless.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

having judges elected to office, something analysts, judges and international observers fear would stack courts with politically biased judges with little experience.

Well, judging by the US where the vast majority if not all judges are either elected or appointed by elected officials, it's clearly a justified worry, what with all the incompetent and/or corrupt judges littering benches at all levels..

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We don't pick our judges here in America, and they're plenty partisan as it is. How much experience did ACB or Cannon have?

Something tells me this is just the complaints of rich people being mad that they might not be able to pick the judges themselves.

[-] polographer@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Bingo!, yes, they are worried elected judges will not choose the rich above regular people.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

“Slammed!”

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

This is very confusing…

So the people against the plan are “investors and financial institutions”. And people want the president to “respect democracy”.

But the plan is to have judges be democratically elected instead of appointed?

Feels like the elites don’t like this plan cause it’ll be slightly harder to handpick their guys to the courts, and are on a media campaign against it.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

America's 'democratically elected judges' are not unbiased. Just look at SCOTUS ffs. Those judges were elected to every judgeship they had previously yet some can't seem to reason themselves out of a wet paper back.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/mexico-judicial-overhaul-protest-court-strike-f9dc6251b894619a3834ec290a5439b5
https://apnews.com/article/obrador-pause-salazar-us-canada-embassy-judicial-d196520eead08883d0ae86ca2d86d97f
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
75 points (96.3% liked)

News

23266 readers
3671 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS