88

Last night Adam Mosseri, Head of Instagram, quitely announced the next step in the integration of Threads into the Fediverse. In addition to being able to follow Threads accounts from Fediverse/Mastodon accounts, we can now reply to and like Threads posts. Threads are taking a quiet, incremental approach to Federation, but seem genuinely commited.

From About Threads and the fediverse

If you turn on sharing to the fediverse, users on other servers can search for and follow your profile, view your posts, interact with your content, and share your content to anyone on or off their server. On Threads, you’ll be able to see the number of users on other servers who liked your post. You'll also be able to see and like their replies to your post.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SouthFresh@lemmy.ml 56 points 2 weeks ago

So they can reply to this:

Get the fuck out.

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 41 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck Meta. God damn cancer on society.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

Please fediblock.

There are 200 mil. Threads users, and 10 mil. in the fediverse. Meta has been unable to meet basic federation assurances, is unable to guarantee moderation, is unable to detect and remove bots reliably, unable to guarantee basic user protections, unable to reliably detect and remove actions like doxxing, harassment, stalking, ban evasion, brigading, etc. etc.

Federating with threads means giving up on these basic protections for users and being overrun with threads users. When there is ONE instance that serves 95% of the users, federation has failed. What happens when Meta engineers start submitting pull requests to the AP protocol? What happens when they fork it to add their own "features?"

Federating with Threads is bad for the present and the future of the fediverse. We need to see more government organizations, universities, and journalists joining and spinning up instances. I want to see @POTUS@whitehouse.gov, @bucky@wisc.edu, and @AndersonCooper@cbsnews.com

[-] missingno@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago

Well put. Even if we assumed Facebook had the best of intentions - which they damn well don't - it needs to be pointed out that other servers get defederated for far, far, far less than what they allow to happen on their platforms. Their moderation is abhorrent, which makes it outright unsafe to federate with them.

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Threads.net federation status on major Lemmy instances:

Also, in memoriam:

[-] endofline@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Embrace, extend, extinguish. Irc ( slack ), jabber ( google talk, facebook messages, hip chat), Usenet and Google groups. Just to name few. Threads should be banned everywhere in fediverse

[-] kbal@fedia.io 14 points 2 weeks ago

According to another report:

Threads users can like the replies from other servers, but they can't yet reply to them, as the feature is still in beta and under development.

It's like they're trying to find out how slowly they can go while still convincing enough people that they're going to get there some day.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 12 points 2 weeks ago

Actually, I guess they're carefully probing to find out exactly what level of freedom they can give their users before they start losing people to the real fediverse. As soon as they find it they'll make things just slightly worse than that.

I wonder how Facebook is going to deal with the inherent privacy flaws of federated social networks. Nobody cares about things like the GDPR or the CCPA for medium social media servers like lemmy.world or Mastodon.social, but when it comes to giants like Facebook and Tumblr things may very well become problematic. No way Facebook is going to sign a data processing agreement with a couple of thousand Fediverse servers.

Pretty cool that the Fediverse is good enough for Facebook to continue investing into it. With Threads, WordPress, and Flipboard, we may very well see more companies cross-integrate through ActivityPub in the future. I don't think Bluesky's federation model will take off, despite it being a lot better on technical level for large services than ActivityPub is.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Really explains the state of the world where even on Lemmy you have people coming in to fight for big businesses invading our people spaces.

Our species is fucked.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

People not wanting to inconvenience themselves to battle climate change or the micro plastics issue wasn't a hint enough already?

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago

please google "dustin carmack" and then fediblock threads.

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck the Heritage Foundation.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
88 points (95.8% liked)

Fediverse

27801 readers
217 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS