865
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 261 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It’s hilarious that the entire point was to draw focus on how Biden fucked up the withdrawal from Afghanistan (while following Trump & literal Taliban combined plan), but all anybody is talking about now is how disrespectful Trump & company is. His purpose for doing this is entirely lost now.

Edit: taliban not isis

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 103 points 2 months ago

The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States–Taliban_deal which was entirely negotiated and ratified by the Trump administration 🙄

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

If I recall Trump said "they couldn't stop even if they tried"

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Crowing about it because he will use it as an attack later. Just like the tax bomb set to raise income tax for regular Americans after Donald's term.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 96 points 2 months ago

Donald Trump is not a smart man. He didn't become the threat that he is due to his own skilful manoeuvring. He became a threat because the institutions that are supposed to oppose people like him have failed.

Now that, for the first time in his political career, he's up against an opponent with basic competence he can't do anything other than flail impotently.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

I didn't care for her, but Clinton I would say had more than basic competence, though she didn't really have much charisma, is pretty unlikable, forced out Bernie Sanders, chose a completely forgettable running mate, was running as an establishment candidate in a "change" election, and has a blatant desire for power. It all worked against her, though she did still win the popular vote. Still fairly competent though.

I would argue Harris is in a similar situation as Clinton, though she apparently had the sense to at least pick someone more likable than herself and her almost invisible tenure as VP actually may work to her advantage. Otherwise, she's not incredibly charismatic on her own and could be in trouble at the debate with Trump, though his elderly, stroke-addled brain may help her out.

But if it gets into the same sort of thing like in his debate with Biden, where Trump is just throwing out BS bombs left and right, and all Kamala does is just uselessly flail around trying to address his BS points one by one, I think she'll be in trouble. She needs to cut through the BS and present herself as the adult in the room, and make Trump seem infantile and ridiculous.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 months ago

Wait. Who was her running mate in 2016? I legitimately don't remember. Wow.

[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 11 points 2 months ago

Kane?

Edit:Kaine

[-] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Tim Kane. I watched his debate with pence and was impressed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DasAlbatross@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I had the exact same reaction and had to look it up. Hard to argue with the completely forgettable tag.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

All agreed. The Clinton's are political animals, best of the best at the game, but Hilary doesn't share her husband's over-the-top charisma. She works best behind the scenes, not on camera kissing babies.

And this hilarious meme hit far too close to home.

[-] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Literally been screaming this since her time as SoS... Hill-Dawg should have run in NY's bluest blueberry of a US House district and then taken the reigns from Pelosi in 2022. She's masterful at running the inner party show... she got that "do it or I'll burn your house down" energy so few people have (liken to LBJ, Pelosi, Cave Johnson, etc).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I was expecting a major crisis when Harris took over since she did abysmally in the 2020 primary. She was one of the first "serious" candidate to drop out, not even making it to 2020. Shes essentially just cruising on "not an old white guy"

[-] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 20 points 2 months ago

I actually remember her being a standout at the debates until Tulsi Gabbard managed to latch onto a line of attack that hurt her credibility as the progressive candidate that she was presenting herself as. Shortly after that traction was lost I think she saw the writing on the wall and exited gracefully, which obviously worked in her favor because it made it easy for Biden to tap her for VP.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Hazzia@infosec.pub 16 points 2 months ago

Not much of a platform for sure but she's absolutely humiliating Trump which seems to be working to put down the facists, so hey I'll take it.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

A candidate would be unwise to talk too much policy this late in the game. You gotta get in end zone before you can go home and fuck the prom queen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 months ago

Even if it worked, that's just more hypocritical nonsense.

"Biden messed up, these 13 Americans are dead. Not quite as many people as I killed by messing up a pandemic response, or by blowing the cover of American spies, but if I get in office again I'm sure my decisions will kill a lot more people. What were we talking about again?"

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

literal Isis

You mean the Taliban's plan, the US negotiated the withdrawal with the Taliban.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

It is crazy to expect the Afghanistan military to fight when the US president negotiated handover of Afghanistan with the Taliban

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 138 points 2 months ago

Please please please start another speakership crisis 🙏

[-] finley@lemm.ee 105 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

ah, yes, the infamous Mierdes Touch

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago

¡Ay Dios Mío!

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 100 points 2 months ago

Man, ever since Biden dropped out, the fascists have been even more incompetent than usual. I'm gonna assume it's from them panicking.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago

Here's the thing, a weak Democrat candidate meant the GOP could ride the curtail of a natural red wave born from voter dissatisfaction into another Trump presidency. They didn't have to try faced with Biden so they didn't have as many opportunities to show their incompetence.

Now democrats have rallied and the writing is on the wall that Trump isn't good enough just by the virtue of being the republican choice. He actually has to try, which he hasn't done since 2016, and he's pretty bad at trying.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 73 points 2 months ago

That is just Trump showing his usual respect for the military and especially the "losers" (according to him) - those who paid the ultimate price to protect the country.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 70 points 2 months ago

Using dead soldiers as a political prop. Keep it classy, Republicans.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 14 points 2 months ago

Support the Troops was only a catchy political slogan.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 60 points 2 months ago

I hope this thing has legs and plagues them endlessly.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 months ago

This is another guy I feel is untrustworthy just based on his face alone.

[-] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

It was the whole. Family porn tracking app thing that skeeved me the fuck out.

Imagine being the secret service IT guy who has to build a firewall around that creepy fuck's wank bank for National Security interests.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

It has a sort of "I raped your cat but you can't prove it" energy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

Then his smarmy ass is just as guilty

[-] PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Mike Johnson with actual power would be a living hell. Turkmenistan levels of living hell. If he had as much power as Trump he'd be at the very least equally as dangerous. If he actually gets his career ruined over this (doubt it) and fucks off forever i'll sleep better at night.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] big_slap@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

ahahahahahahahahahahaha

[-] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 27 points 2 months ago

What's with the devil horn finger gesture two women are making in the picture?

[-] VeryNiiiice@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Pretty sure it's the University of Texas' ~~A&M university's~~ "hook 'em" sign.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago
[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] blusterydayve26@midwest.social 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Fuck Ron Johnson.

Yes, I know it's the wrong Johnson but, still, it needs to be said.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

But they loooooove the troops, right? Right?

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They love the troops like they love women: things to be talked about, controlled and used as you see fit, then thrown away and never thought of again (until there's a scandal anyway).

[-] Corvidae@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

If only avoiding Trump was as easy as avoiding porn!

[-] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 9 points 2 months ago

I feel bad for the Marckesano family. It's so hard to bury a loved one who served our country, with all the pressures and hardships involved. It's an unfair and unexpected addition to a hard time like this.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
865 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4642 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS