316
Was that the song JD picked when he's romancing the foam?
Trump has clearly decided to throw his donor’s campaign donations at legal fees and settlements so he can play whatever he wants at rallies.
The story isn’t the individual violation. The story is that he’s a rich fuck that has decided to pay to repeatedly break the law.
When the penalty is a fine, it's only illegal for poor people
The story behind the story is that he can do that because he doesn't need to spend those funds on actual campaigning, because he intends to win by massive election fraud and/or massive false accusations of voter fraud (in order to fuck up the certification of the votes) instead of actually getting enough EC votes to win legitimately.
I'm guessing this song was held at a rally or event run by some obscure created-for-purpose llc named like "Texans for Trump MAGA Event 2024 LLC" so that when they're sued the man himself and his campaign is effectively immune from prosecution.
Instead some lackey gets to deal with it and the only money that can be extracted is shared amongst other debtors from all the shit they didn't pay for after the event ended.
That's my speculation, but i'd be amazed if this isn't the way they do it.
Coleman said they were grateful that the judge agreed that it would be overstepping his power at this point in the litigation to order the campaign to take down existing videos.
So is youtube overstepping their power when they strip audio from all those content creators videos, demonetize them, or delist them? Just asking because a judge doesn't feel like he has the right to stop videos with stolen copyrighted media from being distributed so long as it's this fucking guy. Everybody else though? Crippling lawsuits, garnished wages, prison time... you name it.
this isnt news, this is the trump campaign just doing illegal things regularly without prosecution. SOP
Lol, gonna be down to kid rock real soon. Maybe they could play some of early stuff when he was a rapper with a flattop fade before he sold out to be trailer trash and afraid of rainbows.
Yeah I was honestly shocked when it turned out like ten years ago that he’s another Kevin Sorbo. I think he was being edgy rather than punk, if that makes sense.
Yeah I was thinking it was joke at first. Then, well, yeah....
Bawitdaba da bang da bang diggy diggy diggy Shake the boogie said up jump the boogie
I was thinking more along the lines of his "Black Chick White Guy" classic. I'll bet 99% of the cult45ers out there would be outraged if they heard it, well, that or call it fake.
I would say use the Imperial March at this point but they'd get a letter from John Williams's lawyers
Musicians have gotten sick of him.
Believe me, it's not just musicians
Why continue? Why not just sticking to those two artists who like him? Kanye and Kid Rock? Both spaced up beyond belief but (for some arcane reason) with a lot of songs people seem to like?
The presidential race is supposed to get you elected. You won’t be crowned the king of the universe for having the highest count of people you confirmedly pissed off.
I've heard "Happy Birthday" is public domain.
It’s not. Apple owns it
Woops. Not Apple. Warner music group
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
316 points (98.5% liked)
politics
18853 readers
4142 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS