84
submitted 1 week ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

If he had been less greedy, he might have got away with it.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Smith's scheme, which prosecutors say ran for seven years, involved creating thousands of fake streaming accounts using purchased email addresses. He developed software to play his AI-generated music on repeat from various computers, mimicking individual listeners from different locations. In an industry where success is measured by digital listens, Smith's fabricated catalog reportedly managed to rack up billions of streams.

AI music wasn't really the point. It was the huge number of fake accounts and taking actions to avoid getting caught. But in our current age, you need to tie everything back to AI to get people's attention. And I'll admit: it worked on me, too.

[-] gencha@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Yes and no:

For example, on or about December 26, 2018, SMITH emailed two coconspirators that, “We need to get a TON of songs fast to make this work around the anti-fraud policies these guys are all using now.”

To obtain the necessary number of songs for his scheme to succeed, SMITH eventually turned to artificial intelligence. In or about 2018, SMITH began working with the Chief Executive Officer of an AI music company (“CC-3”) and a music promoter (“CC-4”) to create hundreds of thousands of songs using artificial intelligence that SMITH could then fraudulently stream. CC-3 soon began providing SMITH with thousands of songs each week that SMITH could upload to the Streaming Platforms and manipulate the streams for.

[-] elfin8er@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm not positive, but I may have run into this guy on Spotify. Several months ago I was listening to Spotify and was recommended two songs in a row that sounded very similar, but had very subtle differences in them. For instance, the baseline in one was slightly altered, and the main synthesisor sounded slightly different. But the overall rhythm and melody were more-or-less the same.

I was able to find 100s of versions of what were essentially the same song with a different title, artist and album art. I made a playlist of them all, but it looks like Spotify removed all but two of the songs I had added:

Obsidian Sisterhood by Aggaraway

Konnual by The Sirens

Edit: just found another one. Beasratis by Olrul

[-] ALittleSticious@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

Im so glad this is what they’re spending their time investigating instead of, yknow, the massive Russian misinformation campaign being pushed to the american public by mainstream media outlets owned by right wing nut jobs.

[-] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 16 points 1 week ago

I think there's scope here for the FBI to be doing more than one thing.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You just wait, they'll be all on it in a months time or two!

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

I see nothing wrong with this Robinhood tactic.

[-] Carnelian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Sadly the big corporations don’t care at all and actually make money when people do these schemes.

They give money to artists based on proportions of overall listens. They take the same cut from the subscriptions either way. So a huge wave of fake listens basically just diverts money that otherwise would have gone directly to artists

[-] Thassodar@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

I like to earn my listens naturally! And I've made...checks notes $36 in 4 years!

Check me out if you want, new track tomorrow on SoundCloud!

www.thassodar.com

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

When real artists are getting ripped off because they don't meet the metric to be included in the payouts, I don't see this as Robinhood-esque.

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Impressive, but seems destined to fall apart. Companies like Spotify presumably have a sense of how "normal" users listen to music. You'd have to spend a fair amount of time mimicking that or you'd get found out eventually. (As he did)

[-] gencha@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I'm going to claim he was detected by automated money laundering prevention systems when he collected the cash. Spotify learned about it from the feds, or their payment processor.

Besides that, in the indictment it says clearly that he was using the thousands of generated titles and bot accounts specifically to work around new anti-fraud systems. This is a classic cat and mouse game.

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
84 points (96.7% liked)

News

22854 readers
3431 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS