139
submitted 1 month ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

A Vermont Christian school that is barred from participating in the state sports league after it withdrew its high school girls basketball team from a playoff game because a transgender student was playing on the opposing team has taken its case to a federal appeals court.

Mid Vermont Christian School, of Quechee, forfeited the Feb. 21, 2023, game, saying it believed that the transgender player jeopardized “the fairness of the game and the safety of our players.”

The executive council of the Vermont Principals’ Association, which governs school sports and activities, ruled the following month that the school had violated the council’s policies on race, gender and disability awareness, and therefore was ineligible to participate in future games.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 month ago

Good on the education department to stand firm on this... it is kind of hilarious that this Christian school is giving a hack to any competing teams - a transgender team member would guarantee victory simply due to the sheer power of trans...

But it's also super shitty for them to refuse to play and further feelings of isolation that most trans teenagers struggle with.

As always, fuck Christians... the best of them are unoffensive but there are so many shitty ones.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Hilarious alternative response, allow them to play technically, but every single team now mysteriously has 1 trans member. Oh, so sorry, looks like we have no teams you're eligible to play against, it's an automatic loss, better luck next season.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

D-d-d-DISQUALIFIED Buzzer sounds before the game even starts

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

On the one hand, hilarious.

On the other hand, I can totally see someone making the claim that this provides evidence of an unfair advantage for trans girls.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I uh... hmm... I got nothing, you're probably right unfortunately.

[-] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 30 points 1 month ago

I wonder how many of those girls were excited to compete until some adult pulled them out because of the No Good Very Bad Unfair Unsafe Trans Girl. While I don't doubt there are teenage transphobes, most of the teenagers I went to school with (Catholic school) or know tangentially have way bigger problems, like zits and algebra homework.

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

All because the school was afraid of some trans girl, who statistically speaking, probably wasn't even one of their best players. The school's transphobia did presumably hurt the trans student they targeted, but I'm guessing they hurt a lot more cis female athletes, on their own team especially. I hope any of those students who may have been transphobic see how it hurt them more than the trans student, and it gets them thinking...

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 2 points 1 month ago

But the Christian school can say "The trans girl deprived you of your playoff! He is evil, see?" to their team.

Complete bullshit, but some of them might swallow it, and become conservatives or TERFs or other anti-trans.

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That's true, bigots will always offer a road deeper into their beliefs, and you can't stop them. But I think here the road out is a bit more visible than usual. It feels like a seed of doubt could be planted in some heads, which is something.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Show us on the basketball where the trans girl touched you.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Under what law could the Principals association be forced to allow them back? If the Association believes rules were broken, what is a federal court going to be able to do?

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

But, but, but! Muh freedom! I have a God-given right to accuse children of being dangerous monsters!

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago

“No religious school or their students and parents should be denied equal access to publicly available benefits simply for holding to their religious beliefs,” Ryan Tucker, senior counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, said in a statement.

When your beliefs are outmoded and harmful to innocent students you're wrong and you aren't a part of the society we are building. Ostracization is appropriate.

In June, a federal judge in Vermont denied a request by the school and some students and parents to be readmitted to the state sports association. U.S. District Court Judge Geoffrey Crawford wrote that the state is unlikely to be found to have violated the school’s First Amendment rights, including its right to free exercise of religion, because it applies its athletic policy uniformly and doesn’t target religious organizations for enforcement or discrimination.

Good. Go play in a league for hateful bigots and leave everyone else alone. Also, stop wasting the courts' time.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
139 points (97.9% liked)

News

23287 readers
3421 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS