this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
115 points (72.9% liked)

World News

39110 readers
2540 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk is on pace to become the world’s first trillionaire by 2027, according to a new report from a group that tracks wealth.

Informa Connect Academy’s finding about the boss of electric carmaker Tesla, private rocket company SpaceX and social media platform X (formerly Twitter) stems from the fact that Musk’s wealth has been growing at an average annual rate of 110%. He was also the world’s richest person, with $251bn, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, as the academy’s 2024 Trillion Dollar Club report began circulating Friday.

The academy’s analysis suggested business conglomerate founder Gautam Adani of India would become the second to achieve trillionaire status. That would reportedly happen in 2028 if his annual growth rate remains at 123%.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 178 points 2 months ago (4 children)

This is a stupid article. I don't think we can expect him to see 123% growth rate for 3 more years. That's like saying my kid grew 6 inches this year by the time they're 40 they will be 19 feet tall.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Not only is it stupid for exaggeration but for also glossing over the idea that it's logical, sensible or moral for any person to own so much wealth that they would never be able to enjoy even just 1% of that during a single lifetime.

It's completely absurd also from the thought that as one person owns enough wealth to pay for the lives of millions of people .... millions of people are living in complete poverty and starvation.

We look through ancient history and laugh at the thought of our ancestors who worshipped kings, queens, god men, emperors and all powerful leaders .... we're still doing the same thing.

These thoughts don't just reflect on people like Musk but on all of us for thinking and accepting that this is all normal behavior for what we all like to think is a modern sophisticated society.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Solid journalist math. According to this logic, if I keep pressing the gas pedal on a 1.0 VW Golf, it will reach the speed of light by 2028. Amazing performance for such a small machine

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 120 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

I feel like there should be a prize for this

Perhaps involving a french antique with a place to rest one's head

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 16 points 2 months ago

I'm okay with taxing ultrawealthy billionaires and corporations out of existence, and giving them back the benefits of a well-fed/housed/clothed/educated/healthy population, of which they would also be the same.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

That's an excellent point. For this oligarch and all others.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago

Tax the fuck out of him.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 months ago

I'd be more worried about shit like this (reported in the article) ...

(Musk's) post said an interview between former Fox News host Tucker Carlson and podcaster Darryl Cooper – a fellow rightwing media figure – was “very interesting. Worth watching.”

Cooper claimed in the interview that the Nazis did not mean to murder so many people when they carried out the Holocaust and killed 6 million Jews during the second world war. Instead, Cooper remarked, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime simply was not equipped to care for them – and the podcaster blamed British prime minister Winston Churchill for “that war becoming what it did”.

Musk ultimately deleted his post, and the White House condemned Carlson’s interview of Cooper as “a disgusting and sadistic insult to all Americans”.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago (15 children)

Right now, if he were able to convert all of his $241.8B to cash, then distribute it evenly among all of the employees at all of his companies, he could give each of his 146,000 employees $1.6M.

No one person should be that wealthy. I don't necessarily think that billionaires should be abolished, but I do think they should be paying a shit load more in taxes than they are.

Also, before anyone says it, yes, I know it's not as simple as converting his holdings to cash. I'm just saying "if it were possible".

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Right now, if he were able to convert all of his $241.8B to cash, then distribute it evenly among all of the employees at all of his companies, he could give each of his 146,000 employees $1.6M.

Fun fact that this doesn't work for every billionaire. Tech companies don't employ very many people compared to their revenue.

If you go by by profits returned to owners as opposed to sale value it's even more stark. Amazon still hasn't paid out anything; it's all been plowed straight back into expansion.

I don’t necessarily think that billionaires should be abolished,

To piss off the remaining side of the political spectrum: Why not?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

Projecting him reaching a trillion dollars by using his average annual growth rate of >100% is ridiculous.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile countless innocent, hard working, and good people are forced into being victims of genocide, abuse, homelessness, hunger, disease, slavery and more. All because the greed of the rich can never be satisfied. Bring out the guillotines.

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 10 points 2 months ago

I bet Leon is delicious.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I hope he's dead ~~by 2027~~.

[–] gaael@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Well, I do wonder what trillionaires taste like. Any seasoning/cooking recommandations ?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago

I do wonder what trillionaires taste like

Lard and bullshit, I would imagine.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 11 points 2 months ago

Oregano will go well with the traces of ketamine in the fat tissue.

[–] OopsAllTwix@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

Burn it and leave it on the stove.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Better marinate that meat in a strong stout for at least a week. :p

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hate this fucking planet so goddamn much

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hey ey ey, don’t go getting all testy with the planet because of some fuckwit humans.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Because the cybertruck is selling like hotcakes and x, fka twitter is making so much money right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I’ll believe it when I see it. He made his good financial decisions when he wasn’t full mask-off insane, since his wife left him and his daughter disowned him he’s had more important things to deal with, like wasting his money turning back the clock so neither of them have any rights anymore. Currently he is just banking off of those good early decisions.

I won’t speak to the specific financials of his companies, but I don’t see him maintaining his current growth rate while so distracted for much longer. I also see his attachment to companies as a growing impediment, not an asset.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The only way this would be conceivable is if FSD actually worked, the robot works and change everything we know, or spacex is sending hundreds of ships to Mars each window.

Doesn't seem possible, nor do I think solving only 1 of the above makes it possible.

Edit: or we wait long enough for inflation to make today's assets at a future inflated value be worth that much without losing any of it in the meantime...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Any reaction gif I could possibly post would be inappropriate and far too disgusting for public viewing, so just imagine I posted a gif of someone spewing bodily fluids out of every orifice like a firehose to gauge my response to finding this out.

[–] FoxyGrandpa@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Can you not use your imagination? Did you learn nothing from Mr. Rogers and Figment?

[–] FoxyGrandpa@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Just trying to make sure we're all on the same page here

[–] citrusface@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I mean you kinda manifested this here, so let's not act surprised.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I’m down with that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Past returns are no guarantee of future success. How many damn times do financial people have to say this?

Given that they've implicitly sampled only the most successful past performers to start with, I'm going to say this is a rare case where the gambler's fallacy works. More likely than not, his future returns will be lower.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

It’s possible putin was already a trillionaire before the war

[–] yourNewFavouriteUser@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I genuinely wonder how this creep keeps failing upward

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Investment-wise, luck. If you had 100 billion and put it all on one risky stock, you too could fail upwards, around half the time.

Public persona-wise, he's basically a professional media villain. He's invited to comment and interview on things because it will always get clicks, even if they're hate clicks.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you are ever confused about how someone magically is making stuff work for them - it means you're missing information. Maybe that's because the other person is lying or doing something illegal. I would guess Musk has some very interesting deals going on with places like Saudi Arabia.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Warjac@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Sounds like someone paid for an article

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago
[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I hope someone viciously kills him before it can happen.

Like, to be clear I am not threatening or anything, but no such thing as a trillionaire should exist, and it's absolutely something that should be punished.

There is no moral way to get there.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

We all knew the trillionaires were coming, only a matter of time. Still this is depressing

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 11 points 2 months ago

I heard he is the world's richest pedophile, finally!

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Not going to be possible with the rate Twitter is going out of business and Tesla cars are stagnating.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I guess buying Twitter hasn't hurt him all that much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

surely he'll be less of a twat then. right?

[–] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Wow! Great! So he'd be the first trillionaire in a nuthouse. And by nuthouse i do not mean the USA.

load more comments
view more: next ›